Opinion

Plasterers Local Union No. 79 v. National Labor Relations Board

  • 461 F.2d 1235
  • 149 U.S. App. D.C. 149
  • 79 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2768
  • 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10878
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Mar 8, 1972
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 66.0%

The opinion

461 F.2d 1235

79 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2768 , 149 U.S.App.D.C. 149 ,

67 Lab.Cas. P 12,487

PLASTERERS LOCAL UNION NO. 79, OPERATIVE PLASTERERS' AND

CEMENT MASONS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO,

Petitioner,

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent,

Texas State Tile & Terrazzo Co., Inc., et al., and Local

Union 20 Bricklayers, etc., Local Union 108

International Association of Marble,

etc., Polishers, et al., Intervenors.

No. 22073.

United States Court of Appeals,

District of Columbia Circuit.

March 8, 1972.

Before McGOWAN, LEVENTHAL and MacKINNON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The court's previous determination in this case 1 has been reversed by the Supreme Court. 2 The cause has been remanded to this court for further proceedings. In our previous disposition, on a jurisdictional question, the court did not reach the merits of the validity of the Board's order issued on June 2, 1968, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act. 3

2

On consideration of the briefs, and argument previously heard, the court is of the view that the Board's determination in the Section 10(k) proceeding that employees represented by Tile Setters Local No . 20 are entitled to the disputed work, is neither arbitrary nor capricious, nor unsupported by substantial evidence, and is therefore valid. This determination is not undercut by the circumstance that a contrary determination would also have been reasonable. Substantial evidence on the whole record supports the Board's finding that petitioner conducted picketing with an object of forcing or requiring the employer to change the assignment of the disputed work from persons represented by Tile Setters Local No. 20 to persons represented by petitioner.

3

The petition to review is denied. The Board's cross-application to enforce its order is granted.

4

So ordered.

1

Plasterers Local Union No. 79 v. N.L. R.B., 142 U.S.App.D.C. 146 , 440 F.2d 174 (1970), Judge MacKinnon dissenting

2

NLRB v. Plasterers Local Union No. 79, 404 U.S. 116 , 92 S.Ct. 360 , 30 L.Ed.2d 312 (1971)

3

Reported at 172 NLRB No. 77

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.