Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,084 results
2.26s
Michelle Francene Gonzales v. Andrew Saul
District Court, C.D. California · Jul 22, 2020
Reddick v. … Lastly, the ALJ cited to a letter from Plaintiff to the Medical Board of California in which Plaintiff discuses her treatment 28 and a physician’s refusal to provide medication.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAlternate Health USA Inc. v. Paul Edalat
District Court, C.D. California · Mar 14, 2022
Ayco Farms, Inc. v. … Piper Aircraft Co. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTracey Leeann Yuhas v. Andrew M. Saul
District Court, C.D. California · Apr 17, 2020
Reddick v. … Smolen v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAbsolute USA, Inc. v. Harman Professional, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Feb 14, 2023
Ebner v. … See, e.g., 7 Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc., 953 F.3d 567, 574 (9th Cir. 2020) (listing “futility” among 8 reasons to deny leave to amend).
Cited 0 timesUnknownAudrey Heredia v. Sunrise Senior Living LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Dec 12, 2019
See Kamakana v. 26 City and Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. 27 Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. … Browning Manor Convalescent Hospital 729 Browning Rd.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNew Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. City of West Covina, California
District Court, C.D. California · Jul 10, 2023
United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 (1962); Chevron Corp. v. Pennzoil 3 Co., 974 F.2d 1156, 1161 (9th Cir. 1992). … Pship v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownK-fee System GmbH v. Nespresso USA, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Apr 28, 2022
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 K-fee System GmbH, CASE NO. 2:21-cv-3402-GW (AGRx) 12 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 v. … patent office about any unpublished patent 3 application, but does not include engaging formally or informally, or directly or 4 indirectly, in any post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Cited 0 timesUnknownColumbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Alejandro Galindo
District Court, C.D. California · Nov 18, 2022
Ebner v. … See Hart v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWonderland Nurserygoods Co Ltd v. Baby Trend, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Feb 13, 2023
See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). … Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCorbrus, LLC v. 8th Bridge Capital, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 13, 2022
Browning-Ferris Indus., 7 Cal. 4th 926, 931 (1994) (internal citation and alteration omitted). … Pavao v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJ.G. v. Los Angeles Unified School District
District Court, C.D. California · Feb 21, 2023
McIntyre v. Eugene Sch. Dist. 4J, 976 13 F.3d 902, 912 (9th Cir. 2020); see A.G. v. Paradise Valley Unified Sch. … See McCullum v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMultiple Energy Technologies, LLC v. Seth Casden
District Court, C.D. California · Feb 21, 2025
Murphy v. … In the alternative, 21 Casden seeks an across-the-board 53% reduction in the requested attorneys’ fees for 22 various alleged deficiencies in MET’s motion. (Id. at 5, 9–20.) 23 A.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJulian Vargas v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 29, 2023
For example, in Fortyune v. … Tauscher v. 1 Phoenix Board of Realtors, Inc., 931 F.3d 959, 965 (9th Cir. 2019). 2
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, C.D. California · Oct 20, 2021
Hedgpeth v. Pulido, 555 U.S. 57, 58, 61– 15 62 (2008) (per curiam) (quoting Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 623 (1993)); see 16 also Clark v. Brown, 450 F.3d 898, 905 (9th Cir. 2006) (as amended). 17 2. … Mays v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownOntario International Airport Authority v. Mag US Lounge Management LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Apr 22, 2025
As the “Clerk of Board of Commissioners... … .; see Mangold v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMag US Lounge Management LLC v. Ontario International Airport Authority
District Court, C.D. California · Apr 22, 2025
As the “Clerk of Board of Commissioners... … .; see Mangold v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown748 F. Supp. 2d 1057 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 8, 2010
The tribunal cited evidence such as a letter from the Board of Directors to the German Army High Command stating that “we are ... very anxious to employ Russian prisoners of war in the very near future, [and] we should be … V.
Vacated by John Doe I v. Nestle, USA, 738 F.3d 1048 (2013)Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, C.D. California · Apr 8, 2022
Nevada 4 v. Jackson, 569 U.S. 505, 511 (2013); see also Brown v. … Allen v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMonster Energy Company v. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Apr 12, 2023
VPX also argues that it will not return to the type of advertising that was the subject of the jury’s verdict because it is now governed by a board of majority-independent directors, who have instructed VPX to complete … Osmose, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFederal Trade Commission v. Seek Capital, LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 2025
See F.T.C. v. … See FTC v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna