Case law

Tyler Covington v. Target Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 8, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 8 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 9 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 19 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 20 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 21 in the margins).

Daniel Velasco v. Carlos Maldonado

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 9, 2021

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 20 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 21 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of 3 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 4 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 5 margins).

Mary Starks v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 20, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies 16 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 17 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify 27 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 28 production without prior privilege review.

Universal Dyeing and Printing, Inc. v. Zoetop Business Co., Ltd.

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 25, 2023

If 12 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 13 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 14 appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or 25 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 26 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 27 in the margins

Leg Avenue, Inc. v. Be Wicked, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 5, 2022

If only a 13 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 14 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 15 in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 17 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 18 without prior privilege review.

Angelica Cota v. Lula Holdings, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 1, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 17 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 18 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 19 … This provision is not intended to modify 7 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 8 production without prior privilege review.

Anthony Sunseri v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 17, 2021

does not—without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, 22 23 establishing … This provision is not intended to modify 21 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 22

Michelle Mills v. Molina Healthcare, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 29, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 17 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 18 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 28 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also Case 2:22-cv-01813-SB-GJS Document 117 Filed 11/29/22 Page 8 of 17 Page ID #:1720 1 must clearly identify the

Jocelyn Gomez v. County of Ventura

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 11, 2023

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 11 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 12 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 22 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 23 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 24 in the margins).

Clarence Warren v. J. Gastelo

District Court, C.D. California · May 26, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 13 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 14 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 26 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 27 without prior privilege review.

Joseph Evans v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 10, 2019

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies 6 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 8 A … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 18 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 19 making appropriate markings in the margins).

Novick Ventures, LLC v. Cindy Seam

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 23, 2021

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 3 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 4 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 16 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 17 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Ruben Briseno v. City of West Covina

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 21, 2021

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 13 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 14 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 24 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 25 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 26 markings in the margins

SoftWave Tissue Regeneration Technologies, LLC v. Dr. Har Hari S. Khalsa, DC

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 18, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 5 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 6 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in … If 17 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 18 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 19 by making appropriate markings

Natia Sampson v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · May 10, 2021

DESIGNATING PROTECTED DOCUMENTS 16 All documents produced by Plaintiff and the County of Los Angeles's 17 DCFS, that compromise the Protected Documents will be clearly … This provision is not intended to modify 3 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 4 production without prior privilege review.

Naomi Shumate v. Remx, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 31, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 13 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 14 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 4 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 5 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

Dawnett Mitchell v. Walmart Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 16, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 25 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) … This provision is not intended to modify 7 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 8 production without prior privilege review.

Christina N. v. City of San Bernardino and Sonny Aguilera

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 6, 2026

Botsford, 141 U.S. 250, 251 (1891) (“The right to one’s person may be said to be a right of complete immunity; to be let alone.”). … This standard is “nowhere as exacting as the clearly established law requirement under [42 U.S.C.] § 1983.” Rodriguez v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, 654 F. Supp. 3d 1029, 1054 (C.D.

Jennifer Stark v. Shein Distribution Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 23, 2023

If only a portion of the 14 || material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 15 |/identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 16 || margins). 17 … This provision is not intended to modify 26 || whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 27 || production without prior privilege review.

Jose Magana v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 30, 2020

If only a 23 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 24 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 25 margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page 7 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 8 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 9 (