Case law

In Re Crystal Palace Gambling Hall, Inc.

817 F.2d 1361 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 20, 1987

Silver, Donald Brown, Frank Meyer, Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. MARK TWAIN INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee and Cross-Appellant. Nos. 85-1614, 85-1663. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. … Pena v. Seguros la Comercial, S.A., 770 F.2d 811, 815 (9th Cir.1985) (citing Taylor v. Sentry Life Insurance Co., 729 F.2d 652, 656 (9th Cir.1984)). See also Oliver v.

The People of the Territory of Guam v. Gregory Junior Fejeran, A/K/A Gregory Cruz

687 F.2d 302 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 30, 1982

See also Bonet v. Texas Co., 308 U.S. 463, 470-71 , 60 S.Ct. 349, 353 , 84 L.Ed. 401 (1940); DeCastro v. Board of Commissioners of San Juan, 322 U.S. 451 , 64 S.Ct. 1121 , 88 L.Ed. 1384 (1941). … Our *307 decision in Carscadden was undercut by DeCastro v. Board of Commissioner of San Juan, 322 U.S. 451, 458 , 64 S.Ct. 1121, 1125 , 88 L.Ed. 1384 (1941) and Bonet v.

Gomez v. United States Postal Service

32 F. App'x 889 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 22, 2002

Gomez’s remedy, if any, is to appeal an adverse personnel decision to the Merit Systems Protection Board. See 5 U.S.C. §§ 1221 , 7513(d). IV. … See Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 *894 (1976); Boyd v. USPS, 752 F.2d 410, 413-14 (9th Cir.1985); White v. GSA, 652 F.2d 913, 916-17 (9th Cir.1981).

Barilla v. Ervin

886 F.2d 1514 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 1, 1989

See, e.g., Richardson v. Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24 , 94 S.Ct. 2655 , 41 L.Ed.2d 551 (1974); Brown v. Chote, 411 U.S. 452 , 93 S.Ct. 1732 , 36 L.Ed.2d 420 (1973); Rosario v. … See, e.g., Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780 , 103 S.Ct. 1564 , 75 L.Ed.2d 547 (1983); Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974); Moore v.

O'Donnell v. United States

91 F.2d 14 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 22, 1936

Orchard v. Alexander, 157 U.S. 372, 383 , 15 S.Ct. 635, 639 [ 39 L.Ed. 737 ].” (Italics supplied.) Brown v. Hitchcock, 173 U.S. 473, 478 , 19 S.Ct. 485, 487 , 43 L.Ed. 772 . … See Johnson v. North Star Lumber Co. (C.C.A.9) 206 F. 624, 628 ; Ennis-Brown v. Central Pacific Ry. Co. (C.C.A.9) 235 F. 825 .

Farid Faham Gamal Ghaly v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

58 F.3d 1425 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 6, 1995

The Board’s purely legal interpretations of the Act are reviewed de novo, but are generally entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A. v. … Where the Board exercises its power to conduct a de novo review of the record, our review is limited to the decision of the Board except to the extent that the IJ’s opinion is expressly adopted by the Board. Alaelua v.

United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 1036, Phillip Mulder Charles Buck Leon Gibbons United Food and Commercial Workers Local 7 United Food and Commercial Workers Local 951, Intervenors v. National Labor Relations Board, Glenn Hilton United Food and Commercial Workers Local 951, Respondents-Intervenors. Phillip Mulder Charles Buck Leon Gibbons and Glenn Hilton v. National Labor Relations Board, Rebecca McReynolds Barbara Kipp, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 7 United Food and Commercial Workers Local 951, Intervenors v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board

265 F.3d 1079 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 14, 2001

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 7; UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 951, Intervenors, v. … NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION, LOCAL 951, Respondent.

S & N Equipment Co. v. Casa Grande Cotton Finance Co.

97 F.3d 337 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 26, 1996

See Boyd v. … Corp. v. Browning, 989 F.2d 1143, 1151 (11th Cir.1993); Palermo v. First Nat’l Bank & Trust Co., 894 F.2d 363 , 368 (10th Cir.1990); Amerifirst Properties, Inc. v.

Linda Romero John Romero Robley C. Brown Reba Arleene Brown v. National General Insurance Company

50 F.3d 16 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 20, 1995

Brown; Reba Arleene Brown, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-55816. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 8, 1994. * Decided March 20, 1995. … Brown was found liable for the maintenance of a car that falls into the category "any auto," and the plain language of the policy can only be read to provide coverage. Cf. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v.

Ljepava v. M.L.S.C. Properties, Inc.

632 F.2d 815 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 13, 1980

Plaintiffs rely on Brown v. Howard, 86 Cal.App. 532 , 261 P. 732 (1927). … was no longer entitled to Brown’s money.

Sofris v. Maple-Whitworth, Inc. (In Re Maple-Whitworth, Inc.)

556 F.3d 742 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 10, 2009

Sofris, APC v. Maple-Whitworth, Inc. (In re Maple-Whitworth, Inc.), 375 B.R. 558 (9th Cir. BAP 2007). … Hanf v. Summers (In re Summers), 332 F.3d 1240, 1242 (9th Cir.2003). The bankruptcy court’s interpretation of bankruptcy statutes are conclusions of law subject to the de novo standard. Beam v.

Delta Sandblasting Company Inc v. NLRB

969 F.3d 957 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 11, 2020

Here, Delta’s petition was filed within 60 days of the Board’s order. The Board and Union do not challenge its timeliness.  DELTA SANDBLASTING V. … the Board’s interpretations of statutes other than the NLRA, Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v.

James Houston v. Arizona State Board of Educati

579 F. App'x 603 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 18, 2014

No. 2:11-cv-01974-SRB v. MEMORANDUM* ARIZONA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; et al., Defendants - Appellees. … See Cervantes v.

Mazurosky v. United States

100 F.2d 958 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 11, 1939

That the defendant may have had guilty knowledge rests upon suspicion only, arising from his acquaintance or association with Nelson and Brown. This is not enough to convict. Copeland v. … Farmer v. United States, supra, 223 F. page 907.

Forest Bates v. Pacific Maritime Association

744 F.2d 705 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 4, 1984

Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive Board, 417 U.S. 249 , 94 S.Ct. 2236 , 41 L.Ed.2d 46 (1974). But see Kallmann v. … v.

David Brown v. Contra Costa County

671 F. App'x 623 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 20, 2016

The few alleged incidents that were arguably related to Brown’s race were not sufficiently severe or pervasive to create an objectively hostile work environment. See, e.g., EEOC v. … (internal quotation marks omitted)); Manatt v.

Stephen Yagman v. Republic Insurance Cna Insurance Valley Forge Insurance

987 F.2d 622 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 4, 1993

We then issued a writ of mandamus ordering reassignment, Brown v. … The essence of Yagman’s argument is that Judge Real’s behavior during the Brown v.

Efrain Antonio Rebollo-Jovel v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

794 F.2d 441 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 11, 1986

Certainly, we ought not jump to the conclusion that the Board is endeavoring to mislead us. See United Steelworkers v. … Acosta is consistent with the Board’s word usage in other cases. In Lopez v.

California ex rel. Rono, LLC v. Altus Finance S.A.

344 F.3d 920 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 15, 2003

Miller, Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, Los Angeles, CA; Richard D. Bernstein, Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, Washington, DC. … Lee v.

Bank of America Nat. Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Turner

62 F.2d 537 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 12, 1932

Ed. 620 ; Schweer v. Brown, 195 U. S. 171, 172 , 25 S. Ct. 15 , 49 L. Ed. 144 ; Galbraith v. Vallely, 256 U. S. 46, 48 , 41 S. Ct. 415 , 65 L. Ed. 823 ; Taubel Co. v. Fox, 264 U. S. 426 , 433, 44 S. Ct. 396 , 68 L. … Board of Education, etc., v. Leary (C. C. A. 8) 236 F. 521, 525 . That ease cites with approval the case of Shea v. Lewis (C. C.