Case law

Hayes v. National Steel & Shipbuilding Co.

7 F. App'x 562 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 14, 2001

V. … Brown two and one-half years after the alleged accident.

National Labor Relations Board v. Christofferson Logliners, Inc.

45 F.3d 436 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 22, 1994

The Board affirmed the ALJ's decision. The Board's order must be enforced if the Board correctly applied the law and if its findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence in the record viewed as a whole. NLRB v. … Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 (1951).

Blufford Hayes, Jr. v. Jill Brown, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin

399 F.3d 972 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 7, 2005

See Griffith v. … In Giglio v.

Donald Beardslee v. Jill Brown, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin

393 F.3d 899 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 16, 2004

Beardslee v. Brown, - U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 281 , 160 L.Ed.2d 68 (2004). Beard-slee has now requested the issuance of a certificate of appealability (“COA”), arguing that he is entitled to relief pursuant to Sanders v. … See Thompson v.

Wong v. Board of Regents of the University of California

13 F. App'x 514 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 19, 2001

Bankamerica Corporation v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

491 F.2d 985 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 29, 1974

Power Comm’n v. Texaco, Inc., 377 U.S. 33 , 84 S.Ct. 1105 , 12 L.Ed.2d 112 (1964); cf. Commercial Nat’l Bank of Little Rock v. Bd. of Governors of Fed. Reserve Sys., 451 F.2d 86 (8th Cir. 1971); see generally K. … See Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138 , 93 S.Ct. 1241 , 36 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973) (per curiam).

George (Bobby W., Ariel D.) v. California State Board of Equalization

905 F.2d 1540 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 22, 1990

905 F.2d 1540 George (Bobby W., Ariel D.) v. California State Board of Equalization NO. 89-15436 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. JUN 22, 1990 Appeal From: Bkrtcy. App.9, 95 B.R. 718 1 AFFIRMED.

Abdullah Brown v. Richard Ives

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 22, 2013

Cherry-Burrell Co. v. Thatcher

107 F.2d 65 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 31, 1939

Appellee testified that he examined the car at the time of Beardsley’s trial and that then the front fender and running board on the right' side were “bent in”. … Brown on October 9, 1936. Dr.

Francisco Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation v. Edward J. Kirby

482 F.2d 481 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 20, 1973

Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 52 Cal.2d 238 , 340 P.2d 1 (1959); Covert v. State Board of Equalization, 29 Cal.2d 300 , 173 P.2d 545 (1946). … Cincinnati Bar Association, 431 F.2d 1209 (6 Cir. 1970); Brown v. Chastain, 416 F.2d 1012 (5 Cir. 1969); Rhodes v. Meyer, 334 F.2d 709 (8 Cir.), cert. den. 379 U.S. 915 , 85 S.Ct. 263 , 13 L.Ed.2d 186 (1964); Goss v.

Supermarket of Homes, Inc. v. San Fernando Valley Board of Realtors

786 F.2d 1400 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 15, 1986

Brewer v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 749 F.2d at 529 . Here, Supermarket’s use of the copyright material exactly paralleled the commercial use by the Board and its complying members. … United States v. Sparks, 685 F.2d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.1982); Ashford v. Steuart, 657 F.2d 1053, 1055 (9th Cir. 1981); Corex Corp. v. United States, 638 F.2d 119, 121 (9th Cir.1981).

Liberty Natural Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Liberty Natural Products, Inc.

73 F.3d 369 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 20, 1995

LIBERTY NATURAL PRODUCTS, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. LIBERTY NATURAL PRODUCTS, INC., Respondent. No. 94-70489. … Wilson Trophy Co. v. NLRB, 989 F.2d 1502, 1507 (8th Cir.1993). 5 The Board held that Liberty's proffered reasons for discharge were merely pretextual.

Larry Brown v. Bank of America

660 F. App'x 506 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 18, 2016

Brown has failed to show that the Victa Letter was privileged and not subject to the crime–fraud exception. See United States v. … Brown does not show that the Victa letter contains “confidential communications between [Brown and his attorney], which [were] made for the purpose of giving legal advice.” United States v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Iron Workers Union, Local 433

767 F.2d 1438 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 9, 1985

Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 465 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). “The Board’s interpretation of the Act is entitled to deference, and will be upheld if reasonably defensible.” NLRB v. … NLRB, 645 F.2d 669, 674 (9th Cir.1980) (Board refusal to defer to arbitral finding); NLRB v.

Quinton Brown v. Larry Adams

667 F. App'x 265 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 23, 2016

BROWN, No. 15-35194 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:13-cv-00192-RMP v. MEMORANDUM* LARRY L. … See Sands v. Lewis, 886 F.2d 1166, 1172 (9th Cir. 1989), overruled on other grounds by Lewis v.

Flinoyd Brown v. Antonio Villaraigosa

637 F. App'x 1001 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 26, 2016

Brown challenges the district court’s refusal to appoint counsel. In Palmer v. … Demoran v. Witt, 781 F.2d 155, 158 (9th Cir. 1985).

Lakeside-Scott v. Multnomah County

556 F.3d 797 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 12, 2009

City of San Diego v. … Compare, e.g., Gee v.

Olson v. Oregon Coal & Navigation Co.

104 F. 574 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 1, 1900

“The navigation of a ship from one port to another constitutes,” as said by Judge Brown in The City of Alexandria (D. … In the recent case of Railroad Co. v. Conroy, 175 U. S. 323 , 20 Sup. Ct. 85, Adv. S. U. S. 85, 44 L. Ed. 181 , where the case of Railroad Co. v. Ross, 112 U. S. 377 , 5 Sup. Ct. 184, 28 L.

United States v. Deandre Brown

651 F. App'x 653 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 6, 2016

And all three women testified that they feared Brown. On this record, Brown fails to demonstrate that the plain error prejudiced him. See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 734 (1993). 2. … Brown’s other assignments of trial error do not require reversal whether considered individually or cumulatively. See United States v.

Gilbertson v. Albright

350 F.3d 1030 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 1, 2003

Brown, Enfield Brown Knivila Razor & Cook, Salem, OR, for the plaintiff-appellant. Richard D. Wasserman, Oregon Department of Justice, Salem, OR, for the defendants-appellees. … That court affirmed the Board's decision without opinion. Gilbertson v.