Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca4

10,000+ results

2.38s

  • United States v. Ryan Brown

    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 29, 2025

    Upon review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Brown’s motion. See United States v. Martin, 916 F.3d 389, 395 (4th Cir. 2019) (stating standard of review). … United States v. Brown, No. 4:08-cr-00184-JD-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 27, 2024).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • J. P. Stevens & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    623 F.2d 322 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 11, 1980

    The Board’s findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence, and its conclusions are warranted by law. See Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. … This was properly rejected because the Board concluded that it would trench on the principles of H. K. Porter Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    316 F. App'x 228 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 9, 2009

    Litton Sys. v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 746 F.2d 168, 173-74 (4th Cir. 1984). … Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order and remand for consideration of Brown’s motion in light of Amendment 715. We deny Brown’s motion for appointment of counsel.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Community Motor Bus Company, Inc.

    439 F.2d 965 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 22, 1971

    Although we accept as supported by substantial evidence the Board’s findings concerning the conduct of the 18 employees, we believe its conclusion overlooks the distinction drawn by NLRB v. … The Board's reliance on NLRB v. Bur-nup & Sims, Inc., 379 U.S. 21 , 85 S.Ct. 171 , 13 L.Ed.2d 1 (1964), is misplaced.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    312 F. App'x 590 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 27, 2009

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8325 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. … United States v. Brown, No. 3:03-cr-00139-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 8, 2008).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • United States v. Shaun Brown

    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 31, 2025

    See Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). … Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • United States v. Brown

    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 10, 2009

    PER CURIAM: Lindsey Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders: (1) granting Brown’s motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), in which Brown sought a reduction … United States v. Brown, No. 2:95-cr-00049-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. filed May 14, 2008, entered May 22, 2008; filed May 15, 2008, entered May 22, 2008; entered June 16, 2008).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Barbara Brown v. Thomas Gorman

    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 16, 2017

    v. … Brown v. Gorman, No. 1:15-cv-01265-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. July 7, 2016; July 28, 2016).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Peter Gakuba v. Anthony Brown

    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 23, 2025

    BROWN, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. … Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Airport Commission Of Forsyth County, North Carolina v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    300 F.2d 185 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 24, 1962

    Templeton Brown, and Mayer, Friedlich, Spiess, Tierney, Brown & Platt, Chicago, Ill., on brief), for intervenor, United Air Lines, Inc. Albert F. … There is no question of the authority of the Board to specify the one airport to serve the over-all area. City of Dallas v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 175 , 221 F.2d 501 (D.C.Cir., 1954).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 26, 2009

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8467 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. … United States v. Brown, No. 4:06-cr- 00582-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 14, 2008).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Frison v. Franklin County Board Of Education

    596 F.2d 1192 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 20, 1979

    Mailloux v. … See Wall v. Stanly County Board of Education, 378 F.2d 275, 278 (4th Cir. 1967). The court found no proof of racial discrimination.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Munn-Goins v. Board of Trustees of Bladen Community College

    393 F. App'x 74 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 26, 2010

    PER CURIAM: Appellees Board of Trustees of Bladen Community College and Darrell Page moved the Court to reconsider, vacate, and deny appellant Ophelia Munn-Goins’ motion to file reply brief out of time, or to strike appellant … Munn-Goins v. Board of Trustees of Bladen Community College, et al, 658 F.Supp.2d 713 (E.D.N.C. 2009).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kendall v. Balcerzak

    650 F.3d 515 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 28, 2011

    On February 3, 2009, HCCOG presented the County Board with an addi- tional 6,079 signatures. KENDALL v. … Nordaas explained that the County Board found, after review of each signature on the petition, that it 24 KENDALL v.

    Cited 251 timesPublished
  • George Brown, Jr. v. W. Frank Smyth, Jr., Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary

    271 F.2d 227 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 19, 1959

    v. … In Diggs v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Crystal Brown v. Carolyn Colvin

    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 2, 2017

    v. … Brown v. Colvin, No. 5:15-cv-00321-KDW (D.S.C. Aug. 22, 2016).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Daniels Construction Co. of Virginia

    332 F.2d 791 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 18, 1964

    PER CURIAM: The Board seeks enforcement of its order based upon a finding by the Examiner 1 that the Respondent violated Section 8(a) (1) 2 of the National Labor Relations Act by discharging two of its employees for having … Our duty to examine the record as a whole to determine whether there is substantial evidence to support the Board's findings was made impossible by the Examiner’s ignoring without explanation or analysis and seemingly without

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • J. P. Stevens & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    668 F.2d 767 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 8, 1982

    The Board may tailor the remedy so as to implement the purposes of the Act as they relate to the dispute as long as the order is remedial instead of punitive. Republic Steel Corp. v. … In modifying or expanding its previous practice the Board cannot simply ignore that practice — “it must make a reasoned explanation for the change.” J. P. Stevens & Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sean J. O'Reilly v. Board of Appeals for Montgomery County, Maryland

    942 F.2d 281 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 13, 1991

    See Friedman v. Supreme Court of Va., 822 F.2d 423 (4th Cir.1987), aff'd, 487 U.S. 59 , 108 S.Ct. 2260 , 101 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988); see also Dennis v. … Trades Council v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    301 F. App'x 203 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 1, 2008

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7256 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. … United States v. Brown, No. 2:02-cr-00178-RAJ- JEB-9 (E.D. Va. filed June 13, 2008; entered June 16, 2008).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.