Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.38s
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 29, 2025
Upon review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Brown’s motion. See United States v. Martin, 916 F.3d 389, 395 (4th Cir. 2019) (stating standard of review). … United States v. Brown, No. 4:08-cr-00184-JD-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 27, 2024).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJ. P. Stevens & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
623 F.2d 322 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 11, 1980
The Board’s findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence, and its conclusions are warranted by law. See Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. … This was properly rejected because the Board concluded that it would trench on the principles of H. K. Porter Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished316 F. App'x 228 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 9, 2009
Litton Sys. v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 746 F.2d 168, 173-74 (4th Cir. 1984). … Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order and remand for consideration of Brown’s motion in light of Amendment 715. We deny Brown’s motion for appointment of counsel.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Community Motor Bus Company, Inc.
439 F.2d 965 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 22, 1971
Although we accept as supported by substantial evidence the Board’s findings concerning the conduct of the 18 employees, we believe its conclusion overlooks the distinction drawn by NLRB v. … The Board's reliance on NLRB v. Bur-nup & Sims, Inc., 379 U.S. 21 , 85 S.Ct. 171 , 13 L.Ed.2d 1 (1964), is misplaced.
Cited 7 timesPublished312 F. App'x 590 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 27, 2009
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8325 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. … United States v. Brown, No. 3:03-cr-00139-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 8, 2008).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 31, 2025
See Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). … Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 10, 2009
PER CURIAM: Lindsey Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders: (1) granting Brown’s motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), in which Brown sought a reduction … United States v. Brown, No. 2:95-cr-00049-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. filed May 14, 2008, entered May 22, 2008; filed May 15, 2008, entered May 22, 2008; entered June 16, 2008).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBarbara Brown v. Thomas Gorman
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 16, 2017
v. … Brown v. Gorman, No. 1:15-cv-01265-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. July 7, 2016; July 28, 2016).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 23, 2025
BROWN, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. … Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAirport Commission Of Forsyth County, North Carolina v. Civil Aeronautics Board
300 F.2d 185 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 24, 1962
Templeton Brown, and Mayer, Friedlich, Spiess, Tierney, Brown & Platt, Chicago, Ill., on brief), for intervenor, United Air Lines, Inc. Albert F. … There is no question of the authority of the Board to specify the one airport to serve the over-all area. City of Dallas v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 175 , 221 F.2d 501 (D.C.Cir., 1954).
Cited 1 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 26, 2009
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8467 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. … United States v. Brown, No. 4:06-cr- 00582-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 14, 2008).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedFrison v. Franklin County Board Of Education
596 F.2d 1192 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 20, 1979
Mailloux v. … See Wall v. Stanly County Board of Education, 378 F.2d 275, 278 (4th Cir. 1967). The court found no proof of racial discrimination.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMunn-Goins v. Board of Trustees of Bladen Community College
393 F. App'x 74 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 26, 2010
PER CURIAM: Appellees Board of Trustees of Bladen Community College and Darrell Page moved the Court to reconsider, vacate, and deny appellant Ophelia Munn-Goins’ motion to file reply brief out of time, or to strike appellant … Munn-Goins v. Board of Trustees of Bladen Community College, et al, 658 F.Supp.2d 713 (E.D.N.C. 2009).
Cited 2 timesPublished650 F.3d 515 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 28, 2011
On February 3, 2009, HCCOG presented the County Board with an addi- tional 6,079 signatures. KENDALL v. … Nordaas explained that the County Board found, after review of each signature on the petition, that it 24 KENDALL v.
Cited 251 timesPublishedGeorge Brown, Jr. v. W. Frank Smyth, Jr., Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary
271 F.2d 227 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 19, 1959
v. … In Diggs v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedCrystal Brown v. Carolyn Colvin
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 2, 2017
v. … Brown v. Colvin, No. 5:15-cv-00321-KDW (D.S.C. Aug. 22, 2016).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Daniels Construction Co. of Virginia
332 F.2d 791 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 18, 1964
PER CURIAM: The Board seeks enforcement of its order based upon a finding by the Examiner 1 that the Respondent violated Section 8(a) (1) 2 of the National Labor Relations Act by discharging two of its employees for having … Our duty to examine the record as a whole to determine whether there is substantial evidence to support the Board's findings was made impossible by the Examiner’s ignoring without explanation or analysis and seemingly without
Cited 1 timesPublishedJ. P. Stevens & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
668 F.2d 767 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 8, 1982
The Board may tailor the remedy so as to implement the purposes of the Act as they relate to the dispute as long as the order is remedial instead of punitive. Republic Steel Corp. v. … In modifying or expanding its previous practice the Board cannot simply ignore that practice — “it must make a reasoned explanation for the change.” J. P. Stevens & Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSean J. O'Reilly v. Board of Appeals for Montgomery County, Maryland
942 F.2d 281 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 13, 1991
See Friedman v. Supreme Court of Va., 822 F.2d 423 (4th Cir.1987), aff'd, 487 U.S. 59 , 108 S.Ct. 2260 , 101 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988); see also Dennis v. … Trades Council v.
Cited 21 timesPublished301 F. App'x 203 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 1, 2008
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7256 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. … United States v. Brown, No. 2:02-cr-00178-RAJ- JEB-9 (E.D. Va. filed June 13, 2008; entered June 16, 2008).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna