The opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6812 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/23/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6812
PETER GAKUBA,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
ANTHONY G. BROWN,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Matthew James Maddox, District Judge. (1:25-cv-00415-MJM)
Submitted: December 18, 2025 Decided: December 23, 2025
Before NIEMEYER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter Gakuba, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6812 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/23/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Peter Gakuba seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 petition as an unauthorized, successive § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable
unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing
of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district
court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the
dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of
the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gakuba has not made
the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Gakuba’s
pending motions, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2