Opinion

United States v. Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jan 26, 2009
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8467

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.

(4:06-cr-00582-RBH-1)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 26, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham,

Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Brown appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for downward departure. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s order. United States v. Brown, No. 4:06-cr-

00582-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.