Opinion

Cook v. County of St. Clair

  • 384 So. 2d 1
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Apr 4, 1980
Status
Published
On the bench
Faulkner, Maddox, Torbert
Cited by
29 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.1%

"[t]here is no restriction to the type of suit that may be brought against [a] county — tort or contract"

How later courts described this case

  • "[t]here is no restriction to the type of suit that may be brought against [a] county — tort or contract"
  • county lacks governmental immunity, can sue and be sued

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

The defendants' application for rehearing prompts the following observation regarding our opinion in this case: Counties are amenable to suit in tort under Code of Alabama, 1975, § 11-1-2 . Because counties, as bodies corporate, act through their governing bodies, the county commissioners, those commissioners likewise are subject to suit in tort, not in their individual capacities but only in their official capacities. The defense of governmental immunity is no longer available in such suits. Cf. Hudson v. Coffee County , 294 Ala. 713 , 321 So.2d 191 (1975).

This order on rehearing applies only to 78-623, Cook v. County of St. Clair. There was no application for rehearing filed in 78-776, Bradshaw v. Houston County.

OPINION EXTENDED; APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OVERRULED.

MADDOX, FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

TORBERT, C.J., dissents.

BLOODWORTH and EMBRY, JJ., not sitting.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.