holding that sexual intercourse or the promise of sexual intercourse is a "thing of value” under the state bribery statute
How later courts described this case
- holding that sexual intercourse or the promise of sexual intercourse is a "thing of value” under the state bribery statute
- holding that sexual intercourse or the promise of sexual intercourse is a “thing of value” under state bribery statute
- interpreting prior version of bribery statute
- “The test of value is the desire of a person for the thing in question.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
ON REHEARING
Application overruled.
CATES, P. J., and TYSON, HARRIS and DeCARLO, JJ., concur.