Opinion

Wilson Dickson v. Mrs. C. O. Edwards

  • 293 F.2d 211
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Sep 12, 1961
Status
Published
Author
Wisdom
On the bench
Wisdom, Cameron, Brown, Hannay
Cited by
17 cases

federal court has jurisdiction to review administrative decisions such as cancellation or termination of Conservation Reserve contract but did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate rights between landlord and tenant

How later courts described this case

  • federal court has jurisdiction to review administrative decisions such as cancellation or termination of Conservation Reserve contract but did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate rights between landlord and tenant

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

WISDOM, Circuit Judge,

with whom TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and RIVES, Circuit Judge, join (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Caulfield v. United States Department of Agriculture, No. 18429, 5 Cir., 293 F.2d 217 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.