Opinion

Wilson Dickson v. Mrs. C. O. Edwards

  • 293 F.2d 211
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Sep 12, 1961
Status
Published
On the bench
Wisdom, Cameron, Brown, Hannay
Cited by
17 cases

federal court has jurisdiction to review administrative decisions such as cancellation or termination of Conservation Reserve contract but did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate rights between landlord and tenant

How later courts described this case

  • federal court has jurisdiction to review administrative decisions such as cancellation or termination of Conservation Reserve contract but did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate rights between landlord and tenant

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

*217 On Rehearing by the Court En Banc.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON, RIVES, CAMERON, JONES, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Subsequent to the announcement of the opinion in this case on January 13, 1961, the Court, by an Order en banc, vacated the opinion and judgment and ordered the cause resubmitted along with Caulfield v. United States Department of Agriculture, No. 18429, 5 Cir., 293 F.2d 217 , for consideration by the Court en banc. On such reconsideration the Court adheres to the judgment and opinion heretofore filed, and it now becomes the opinion of the Court, en banc.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.