Opinion

Threadgill v. State

  • 74 Ark. App. 301
  • 47 S.W.3d 304
  • 2001 Ark. App. LEXIS 518
Court
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Filed
Jun 27, 2001
Status
Published
Author
Roaf
On the bench
Agree, Baker, Bird, Crabtree, Griffen, Jennings, Roaf, Robbins, Stroud, Vaught
Cited by
1 cases

The opinion

Andree LAYTON Roaf, Judge, concurring in part; dissenting in part. I agree that this case should be affirmed on the point involving the court’s admission into evidence of the taped interview of Tequila Hall, and I join in the majority opinion of Judge Jennings as to that point.

However, I conclude that the trial court committed error in failing to prohibit the testimony of Christopher Parker because of the apparent loss by the sheriff s office of Parker’s two recorded statements. I join in Judge Griffen’s dissent on this point, with the exception of the last paragraph before his conclusion, which suggests that our trial and appellate judges have been less than respectful of the rights of criminal defendants with regard to Ark. R. Crim. P. 17.1.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.