Opinion

Threadgill v. State

  • 74 Ark. App. 301
  • 47 S.W.3d 304
  • 2001 Ark. App. LEXIS 518
Court
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Filed
Jun 27, 2001
Status
Published
Author
Bird
On the bench
Agree, Baker, Bird, Crabtree, Griffen, Jennings, Roaf, Robbins, Stroud, Vaught
Cited by
1 cases

The opinion

Sam Bird, Judge, concurring in part; dissenting in part. I agree that this case should be affirmed on the point involving the court’s admission into evidence of the taped interview of Tequilla Hall, and I join in the majority opinion of Judge Jennings as to that point.

However, I dissent from the view expressed in the majority opinion that the trial court committed no error in not prohibiting the testimony of Christopher Parker because of the apparent loss by the sheriffs department of two recorded statements given by Parker to the Miller County Sheriffs Department. Consequently ! join in the dissenting opinion of Judge GRIFFEN on that point.

Judge Vaught joins in this opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.