Opinion

Reclamation Dist. No. 108 v. Hagar

  • 66 Cal. 54
  • 4 P. 945
  • 1884 Cal. LEXIS 682
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Oct 28, 1884
Status
Published
Author
Myrickmckee
On the bench
McKee, McKinstry, Myrick, Sharpstein, Thornton
Cited by
9 cases

The opinion

Myrick, J., and McKee, J., dissenting.

We concur in the foregoing opinion in all respects, except as to the admissibility of evidence concerning the payment of attorneys’ fees and for procuring legislation; in those respects, we think the evidence was admissible.

Rehearing denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.