Opinion

Reclamation Dist. No. 108 v. Hagar

66 Cal. 54
4 P. 945
1884 Cal. LEXIS 682

Court: California Supreme Court
Filed: Oct 28, 1884
Status: Published
Author: Thornton
On the bench: McKee, McKinstry, Myrick, Sharpstein, Thornton
Cited by: 9 cases
Authority: More cited than 26.0%

The opinion

Thornton, J., specially concurring.

I concur in the above, except what is said in relation to the last point discussed. I think that the Act of 1868 was repealed as far as regards this point by the one hundred and sixteenth section of the Act of March 30, 1874 (see amendments to the Codes for 1873-’74, 60) ; therefore the action was properly brought in the name of the reclamation district. (Pol. Code, § 3466 ; People v. Sag-gin, 57 Cal. 579 .) The proceedings in regard to the assessment substantially followed the provisions of the Political Code.

I therefore concur in the judgment.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.