Timeliness
FederalAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
USPTO TMEP › Chapter 1700 - Petitions, Requests for Reinstatement, and Other Matters Submitted to Director › TMEP § 1705.04
Text
To avoid prejudicing the rights of third parties, petitions
must be filed within a reasonable time after the disputed event. In many cases, deadlines
for filing petitions are expressly stated in the rules. The following petition deadlines
run from the issue date of the action or order of which the petitioner seeks review:
Petition to revive an abandoned
application
– by not later than two months after the issue date of the
notice of abandonment or two months after the date of actual knowledge of the
abandonment and not later than six months after the date the trademark electronic
records system indicates that the application is abandoned, where the applicant declares
under
37 C.F.R. §2.20
or
28 U.S.C. §1746
that it did not receive the notice of abandonment
(
37 C.F.R. §2.66(a)
;
see
TMEP §§1705.05
,
1714–1714.01(g)
);
Petition to revive goods/services/classes
deleted for failure to respond to a partial refusal or requirement
– by not
later than two months after the issue date of the examiner’s amendment deleting
(abandoning) the goods/services/classes to which the refusal or requirement pertained or
two months after the date of actual knowledge of the issuance of the examiner’s
amendment deleting (abandoning) the goods/services/classes to which the refusal or
requirement pertained and not later than six months after the date the trademark
electronic records system indicates that the application is abandoned in part by
examiner’s amendment, where the applicant declares under
37 C.F.R. §2.20
or
28 U.S.C. §1746
that it did not receive the examiner’s amendment
(
37 C.F.R
r’s
amendment deleting (abandoning) the goods/services/classes to which the refusal or
requirement pertained and not later than six months after the date the trademark
electronic records system indicates that the application is abandoned in part by
examiner’s amendment, where the applicant declares under
37 C.F.R. §2.20
or
28 U.S.C. §1746
that it did not receive the examiner’s amendment
(
37 C.F.R. §2.66(a)
;
see
TMEP §§718.02(a)
,
1705.05
,
1714–1714.01(g)
);
Petition to reverse an examining attorney’s
holding of abandonment for failure to file a complete response to an Office
action
– by not later than two months after the issue date of the notice of
abandonment or two months after the date of actual knowledge of the abandonment and not
later than six months after the date the trademark electronic records system indicates
that the application is abandoned, where the applicant declares under
37 C.F.R. §2.20
or
28 U.S.C. §1746
that it did not receive the notice of abandonment
(
see
37 C.F.R. §2.146(d)(2)(i)
);
Petition to review an examining attorney’s
formal requirement
– by not later than the end of the response period for
the Office action maintaining the requirement (
15 U.S.C. §1062(b)
;
37 C.F.R. §§2.62
,
2.63(a)
,
(b)
) (
see
TMEP §711
regarding the deadline for response to an Office
action and
§711.01
regarding requests for an extension of
time to respond to an Office action with a three-month response period);
Petition to reinstate a registration and accept
a late response to an Office action issued in connection with a timely filed affidavit
of use or excusable non-use under Section 8 or 71 of the Act, or a renewal application
under Section 9 of the Act
– by not later than two months after the issue
date of the cancellation notice or two months of actual knowledge of the cancellation
and not later than six months after the date the trademark electronic records system
indicates that the registration is cancelled/expired (
see
37 C.F.R
of use or excusable non-use under Section 8 or 71 of the Act, or a renewal application
under Section 9 of the Act
– by not later than two months after the issue
date of the cancellation notice or two months of actual knowledge of the cancellation
and not later than six months after the date the trademark electronic records system
indicates that the registration is cancelled/expired (
see
37 C.F.R. §2.146(d)
;
see
TMEP §1712.02(b)
);
Petition to review a Section 8 or 71
rejection
– by not later than six months after the issue date of the Office
action maintaining a refusal of the affidavit (
37 C.F.R. §2.165(b)
;
see
TMEP §§1604.18–1604.18(a)
,
1613.18–1613.18(a)
);
Petition to review a Section 7
rejection
– by not later than six months after the issue date of the Office
action refusing to enter an amendment or correction (
37 C.F.R. §2.176
);
Petition to review the denial of a request for
an extension of time to file a notice of opposition
– by not later than 15
days after the issue date of the grant or denial of the request (
37 C.F.R. §2.146(e)(1)
);
Petition to review an interlocutory order of
the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
– by not later than 30 days after the
issue date of the order from which relief is requested (
37 C.F.R. §2.146(e)(2)
);
Petition to review the denial of certain timely
filed paper submissions with statutory deadlines
– by not later than two
months after the issue date of the notice denying acceptance of the paper filing
(
37 C.F.R. §2.147(b)(2)
);
Request for reconsideration of decision on
petition
– by not later than two months after the issue date of the decision
denying the petition or two months after the date of actual knowledge of the decision
denying the petition and not later than six months after the issue date of the decision,
where the applicant declares under
37 C.F.R. §2.20
or
28 U.S.C. §1746
that it did not receive the decision
(
37 C.F.R
reconsideration of decision on
petition
– by not later than two months after the issue date of the decision
denying the petition or two months after the date of actual knowledge of the decision
denying the petition and not later than six months after the issue date of the decision,
where the applicant declares under
37 C.F.R. §2.20
or
28 U.S.C. §1746
that it did not receive the decision
(
37 C.F.R.
§§2.66(e)(1)
,
2.146(i)(1)
);
Petition to review the denial of certification
of an international application
– by not later than two months after the
date of actual knowledge of the denial of certification of an international application
under
§7.13(b)
and not
later than six months after the trademark electronic records system indicates that
certification is denied where the applicant or registrant declares under
37 C.F.R. §2.20
or
28 U.S.C. §1746
that it did not receive the action, or no action was
issued (
37 C.F.R. §2.146(d)(2)(iii)
).
If the rules do not provide an express deadline, the petition
must be filed by not later than two months after the issue date of the action from which
relief is requested.
37 C.F.R.
§2.146(d)(1)
.
The time limits set forth in the rules are strictly enforced.
Petitions filed after the expiration of the deadlines are denied as untimely. If the
petitioner can show that extraordinary circumstances caused the delay in filing the
petition, the petitioner may request waiver of these time limits, pursuant to
37 C.F.R.
§2.146(a)(5)
and
§2.148
.
See
TMEP §1708
regarding waiver of rules.
On the rare occasions when filing on paper is permitted,
petitions mailed to the USPTO by the due date in accordance with
37 C.F.R.
§2.197
or
§2.198
will be considered timely.
See
37 C.F.R.
§2.195(b)(1)-(2)
. See
TMEP
§§301.02-301.02(e)
regarding the limited exceptions for paper
submissions,
§§305.02-305.02(h)
regarding certificate of mailing procedures,
and
§§305.03-305.03(e)
regarding Priority Mail Express®
procedures
hen filing on paper is permitted,
petitions mailed to the USPTO by the due date in accordance with
37 C.F.R.
§2.197
or
§2.198
will be considered timely.
See
37 C.F.R.
§2.195(b)(1)-(2)
. See
TMEP
§§301.02-301.02(e)
regarding the limited exceptions for paper
submissions,
§§305.02-305.02(h)
regarding certificate of mailing procedures,
and
§§305.03-305.03(e)
regarding Priority Mail Express®
procedures.
See
TMEP
§1705.05
regarding the duty to exercise due diligence in monitoring
the status of pending trademark matters.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.