Section 2865.110 Available for Work

Section 2865

Section 2865.110  Available for

Work

a)         An individual is available for work,  even if he or she imposes

conditions upon the acceptance of work,  unless a condition so narrows

opportunities that he or she has no reasonable prospect of securing work. An

individual is considered available for work to the full extent permitted by 20

CFR 604, effective February 15, 2007, except when inconsistent with the express

holding of published Illinois case law.

EXAMPLE 1:  An

individual who lives in a remote rural area limits his availability to jobs

within walking distance of his home. If few jobs for which he is qualified are

located within walking distance of his home, it could be found that he has no

reasonable prospect of securing the work and therefore would not be available

for work.

EXAMPLE 2: A claimant who had been

a clerk at a retail store is responsible for a minor child who is prevented

from attending school due to closures resulting from the COVID-19 virus. The

individual must stay home to watch his/her child until school reopens. However,

the claimant is able to perform work that could be performed from the isolation

of his/her home (e.g., transcribing, data entry, virtual assistant services)

and makes himself/herself  available to perform that work. While the claimant

is not currently available for work at a retail location, he/she is available

for work due to his/her availability for work that could be performed from

home.

b)         If domestic circumstances prevent an individual from working

during the normal days and hours that exist in his or her occupation (or other

work for which he or she is qualified), he or she is unavailable for work.

1)         EXAMPLE:  An individual, who was employed as a security guard,

has children who require full-time care. The individual is able to obtain child

care during evenings only, leaving him free to work nights only

individual from working

during the normal days and hours that exist in his or her occupation (or other

work for which he or she is qualified), he or she is unavailable for work.

1)         EXAMPLE:  An individual, who was employed as a security guard,

has children who require full-time care. The individual is able to obtain child

care during evenings only, leaving him free to work nights only. Because there

is a labor market for night-shift security guards, he would be determined to be

available for work.

2)         EXAMPLE:  An individual and her husband obtain a divorce, and

she is awarded custody of their children. She then quits her job as a hospital

respiratory therapist because she is required to work rotating shifts and be on

emergency call and because she wishes to spend all nights and weekends with her

children. She states that she still applies for work as a respiratory

therapist, but has had to eliminate from her list most hospitals because they

will not guarantee day-shift work, the only time for which she will arrange

child care. She would be determined to be unavailable for work.

3)         EXAMPLE:  When the individual is laid off from her job as a

bank teller, she, in turn, lays off her babysitter, who is not needed so long

as the individual is at home. She states that, if she is offered a job, she

will rehire her babysitter. Despite the fact that she currently has no

babysitter, this individual would be determined to be available to work.

c)         If the individual demands a wage that is unreasonable and,

thereby, prices himself or herself out of the labor market, he or she is

unavailable for work. Whether a wage demand is unreasonable is determined by

factors including, but not limited to:  the individual's prior wages and

qualifications, the prevailing wage, labor laws, union agreements, and the

length of unemployment; generally, the individual must lower his or her wage

demand the longer he or she  is unemployed

f or herself out of the labor market, he or she is

unavailable for work. Whether a wage demand is unreasonable is determined by

factors including, but not limited to:  the individual's prior wages and

qualifications, the prevailing wage, labor laws, union agreements, and the

length of unemployment; generally, the individual must lower his or her wage

demand the longer he or she  is unemployed.

1)         EXAMPLE:  An individual worked for 25 years as a bookkeeper

for a small but prosperous business that was eventually bought out. She last

earned $600 per week. Upon re-entering the labor market, she discovers that her

wage demand – inflated by her many years of service – is much greater than that

most employers are willing to pay. In the early weeks of unemployment, she may

seek work paying $600 per week, based upon her prior wages and her

qualifications. In ensuing weeks, she must lower her wage expectations. As her

unemployment approaches 26 weeks (or the time when an "extended

benefits" period might begin), she must further lower her wage

expectations. If, as time goes by, she adapts her wage expectations to meet

market conditions, she would be determined to be available for work.

2)         EXAMPLE:  The individual is a union electrician. After 20

weeks of unemployment, he still insists upon the wage he was last paid, that is

union scale. He explains that the union has agreements affecting a substantial

percentage of the jobs in his locality and, were he to accept a job paying

below union scale, he would be disciplined by being denied future job

opportunities. His insistence upon union scale is not unreasonable. However, if

he is seeking work in another locality, where his union is not active, his wage

demand with respect to that locality is unreasonable.

3)         EXAMPLE:  The individual worked as a fast food counter clerk,

earning $0.50 above minimum wage. During the first weeks of unemployment, he

sought work paying that same wage

pportunities. His insistence upon union scale is not unreasonable. However, if

he is seeking work in another locality, where his union is not active, his wage

demand with respect to that locality is unreasonable.

3)         EXAMPLE:  The individual worked as a fast food counter clerk,

earning $0.50 above minimum wage. During the first weeks of unemployment, he

sought work paying that same wage. For the next few weeks, he sought work

paying minimum wage. Even though he has now been unemployed for 25 weeks, he

has not reduced his wage expectation any further. This is not unreasonable:  to

require him to seek work paying less than minimum wage would violate minimum

wage laws.

d)         If there are no work opportunities that an individual can

reach from his or her home, he or she is unavailable for work. If the

individual unreasonably restricts the distance or time he or she will travel to

work, he is unavailable for work. Reasonableness is determined by factors

including, but not limited to:  where work opportunities are located, the

customs of workers similarly situated (as to location or occupation), the types

and costs of transportation, physical capabilities, and the length of

unemployment; generally, an individual is expected to extend the area in which

he or she will seek work the longer he or she is unemployed. Generally, in

metropolitan areas, 1½ hours, each way, is not an unreasonable travel time.

1)         EXAMPLE:  An individual owns no car, and there is no public

transportation near his home. He used to obtain work through a temporary help

service that transported him to clients' job sites. He no longer works as a

temporary. He states that he will work for any employer, provided it will

furnish transportation to the job. He would be determined to be unavailable for

work since the majority of employers do not furnish transportation for their

employees.

2)         EXAMPLE:  The individual resides in a suburb 30 miles

northwest of downtown Chicago

sported him to clients' job sites. He no longer works as a

temporary. He states that he will work for any employer, provided it will

furnish transportation to the job. He would be determined to be unavailable for

work since the majority of employers do not furnish transportation for their

employees.

2)         EXAMPLE:  The individual resides in a suburb 30 miles

northwest of downtown Chicago. He was last employed as an attorney, working in

a small practice in that suburb, where his travel time to work was 10 minutes.

In the first weeks of unemployment, he unsuccessfully sought work in his community

and neighboring suburbs. Although he has now been unemployed for 2 months, he

still does not seek work in downtown Chicago, to which most attorneys commute,

because rush hour travel time would be nearly 1½ hours each way. He would be

determined to be unavailable for work, because he has not extended the area in

which he will seek work, commuting to downtown Chicago is customary for workers

in his occupation, and 1½ hours travel time is not unreasonable.

3)         EXAMPLE:  Although the individual is developmentally disabled,

she is capable of working in certain unskilled occupations. At her last job,

she swept floors in a local drug store. Her father testifies that she must work

within walking distance of home, because, if she rides public transportation,

she becomes confused and lost. In this case, the individual's restriction upon

distance to work is reasonable, provided that work opportunities continue to

exist within walking distance of her home, in which case she will be determined

to be available for work.

e)         If an individual's personal habits are inconsistent with the

type of work he or she is seeking, he or she is unavailable for work.

EXAMPLE:  The

individual, a punch press operator, was discharged because she would not cut

her waist-length hair or wear a hair net or remove oversized rings she wore on

her fingers; her hair and rings are considered safety hazards

be available for work.

e)         If an individual's personal habits are inconsistent with the

type of work he or she is seeking, he or she is unavailable for work.

EXAMPLE:  The

individual, a punch press operator, was discharged because she would not cut

her waist-length hair or wear a hair net or remove oversized rings she wore on

her fingers; her hair and rings are considered safety hazards. She states that

she is seeking work as a punch press operator, but that she will not work for

any employer who requires her to cut her hair or wear a hair net or remove her

rings. She would be determined to be unavailable for work.

f)         An individual shall not be held unavailable for work on the

basis of refusing to consider particular work that he or she honestly believes

would violate sincere religious or moral convictions. However, an individual

shall be held unavailable if his or her convictions eliminate virtually all of

the labor market.

EXAMPLE:  For

many years, an individual was a hot dog vendor, working in sports stadiums on

Saturdays and Sundays. The individual states that he will no longer work in the

food service industry, nor will he work on Sunday. He explains that he has

recently married and that his wife has introduced him to religion. Among the

tenets of his religion are strict dietary laws, forbidding even handling of

many commonplace foods; also, Sunday is prescribed as a day of rest. If it is

determined that his religious convictions are sincere, he would not be held

unavailable for work solely on the basis of refusing to consider food service

or Sunday work, even though these may have been suitable previously. Still, he

must demonstrate that he is available for other types of work at other times.

g)         If the individual is self-employed, availability depends upon

the nature and extent of that self-employment; whether the individual's

investment of time or capital prevents him or her from accepting other work in

the labor market

r Sunday work, even though these may have been suitable previously. Still, he

must demonstrate that he is available for other types of work at other times.

g)         If the individual is self-employed, availability depends upon

the nature and extent of that self-employment; whether the individual's

investment of time or capital prevents him or her from accepting other work in

the labor market.

EXAMPLE:  The

individual worked as a secretary in a real estate agency. When she was laid

off, she grew depressed, until she watched a cable television show. The host

explained how to buy property without making down payments and how to enhance

cash-flow. It sounded so easy that she immediately rearranged the den in her

house to serve as an office. In the morning, she would read newspapers and make

telephone calls. She went to foreclosure sales and auctions. Most afternoons

and evenings, she would inspect properties. She also applied for jobs in her

usual occupation, secretary. This individual would be determined available for

work, if the trier of fact finds that she had not yet made a substantial

commitment to her own business. If, however, she had purchased properties, and

was involved in the management of those properties to the extent that it would

conflict with normal working hours, she would be determined to be unavailable

for work.

h)         Whether a seasonal worker is available for work during the

off-season is determined by whether there is some prospect of obtaining work in

his or her customary occupation. If there is no prospect of obtaining that

work, the individual must seek other work for which he or she is qualified.

EXAMPLE:  The

individual is a golf course maintenance man. The courses at which he works are

open from April through October. He has never been employed during the

off-season. On his work search record, for weeks in January, he indicates that

he is seeking work in the field of lawn care and maintenance, for which there

are no prospects of work

seek other work for which he or she is qualified.

EXAMPLE:  The

individual is a golf course maintenance man. The courses at which he works are

open from April through October. He has never been employed during the

off-season. On his work search record, for weeks in January, he indicates that

he is seeking work in the field of lawn care and maintenance, for which there

are no prospects of work. He would be determined unavailable for work.

i)          Whenever an individual appears to be imposing a condition

upon his or her acceptance of work, it is essential to establish whether he or

she is merely expressing a preference as opposed to actually imposing a

condition.

EXAMPLE:  The

individual last earned $7.50 per hour, the prevailing wage in her occupation. During

her interview with the claims adjudicator, she states that she will accept

$9.00 per hour for similar work. During the interview, the adjudicator reviews

her work search record and asks what the wages were for her contacts during the

period under review. The work search contacts were for work paying closer to $7.50

than $9.00.  This might indicate that $9.00 was a preference, not a condition.

Therefore, she would be determined to be available for work.

j)          The best evidence that an individual is "available for

work" is that he or she readily secures work, despite the imposition of a

condition.

EXAMPLE:  The

individual is laid off from her job in an occupation that ordinarily provides

daytime work only. She files a claim for benefits, and, on an initial

questionnaire, she writes that she will work nights only, because her child

care arrangements have changed. That week, she makes employer contacts for

night-shift work. As a result of that work search, she readily secures work

beginning the next week. She would be determined to be available for work for

the prior week.