Section 1520.46 Application and Receipt of Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 Funds
IllinoisRegulations
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Illinois Administrative Code › Title 20 CORRECTIONS, CRIMINAL JUSTICE, AND LAW ENFORCEMENT › CHAPTER III: ILLINOIS CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION AUTHORITY › Part 1520 OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF FEDERAL FUNDS › Section 1520.46 Application and Receipt of Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 Funds
Text
Section 1520
Section 1520.46 Application
and Receipt of Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 Funds
a) The Authority will annually review Section 501 of the
Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-690, effective November 18, 1988) and
based on the need for services to enforce state and local laws that establish
offenses similar to offenses established in the Controlled Substances Act (21
U.S.C. 801 et. seq.) and to improve the functioning of the criminal justice
system with emphasis on violent crime and serious offenders, the services
available to address that need, and oral and written comment and testimony received
at public meetings conducted pursuant to the Open Meetings Act (Ill. Rev. Stat.
1987, ch. 102, par. 41 et seq.), select program funding priorities for each
federal fiscal year. Such funding priorities shall be selected by the Authority
at a public meeting in conformance with the Open Meetings Act and the
Authority's rules (2 Ill. Adm. Code 1750.310 et seq.).
b) Federal funds made available to the State of Illinois through
the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 shall be distributed to State agencies and units
of local government. In distributing funds among urban, rural and suburban
units of local government and combinations thereof, the Authority shall give
priority to those jurisdictions with the greatest need. Based on the funding
priorities selected by the Authority pursuant to subsection (a) above, the
Executive Director shall use the following evaluation criteria to identify
those State agencies and units of local government eligible for the receipt of
federal funds:
1) analysis of need as evidenced by demographic and criminal
justice data;
2) comments from the public and state and local officials;
3) information (including but not limited to drug activity
information, arrests, prosecutions, drug types, prior experience with grants
and current efforts regarding drug enforcement) indicating the likelihood that
a State agency or unit of local governmen
s of need as evidenced by demographic and criminal
justice data;
2) comments from the public and state and local officials;
3) information (including but not limited to drug activity
information, arrests, prosecutions, drug types, prior experience with grants
and current efforts regarding drug enforcement) indicating the likelihood that
a State agency or unit of local government will achieve the desired objectives
of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988;
4) drug law enforcement and violent crime information, including
arrests, prosecutions, convictions, recidivism, (percentages as well as gross
numbers), overdose, information provided to police by citizens, and treatment
information such as admissions to programs; and
5) current research findings.
c) A unit of local government or State agency, so identified
pursuant to subsection (b) above, shall be contacted by the Executive Director
to assess its interest in and ability to qualify for the receipt of federal
funds pursuant to the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 and, if
so interested and so qualified, to prepare a description of programs or
services that identifies the problem to be addressed, states goals and
objectives, and indicates the means by which the unit of local government or
State agency proposes to achieve those goals and objectives. In assessing the
interest in and ability to qualify for the receipt of the above-mentioned
funds, the Executive Director shall consider resolutions from county and
municipal boards and written assurance from these boards of their ability to
obtain the required matching money.
d) A unit of local government or state agency not so contacted by
the Executive Director pursuant to subsection (c) above shall, however, upon
written request to the Executive Director, be included among those units of
local government or State Agencies evaluated by the Executive Director pursuant
to the criteria established in subsection (b) above
obtain the required matching money.
d) A unit of local government or state agency not so contacted by
the Executive Director pursuant to subsection (c) above shall, however, upon
written request to the Executive Director, be included among those units of
local government or State Agencies evaluated by the Executive Director pursuant
to the criteria established in subsection (b) above. Such written request shall
include a description of programs or services that identifies the problem to be
addressed, states goals and objectives, and indicates the means by which the
unit of local government or State Agency proposes to achieve those goals and
objectives. In assessing the interest in and ability to qualify for the receipt
of federal funds pursuant to the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, the Executive
Director shall consider resolutions from county and municipal boards and
written assurance from these boards of their ability to obtain the required
matching money. If the Executive director determines that the unit of local
government or State Agency is not so eligible or so qualified, the Executive
Director shall notify the unit of local government or State Agency, within 45
days of receipt of the written request, that it will not be recommended for
funding and the reasons for such recommendation. The unit of local government
or State Agency may submit a written request for reconsideration to the
Chairman of the Budget Committee within 28 days from receiving notice from the
Executive Director. The written request for reconsideration shall include the
reasons for requesting reconsideration by the Budget Committee.
e) The Budget Committee shall, at a public meeting conducted
pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, designate programs or projects, implementing
agencies, and amounts for funding which address one or more of the program
priorities specified by the Authority in subsection (a) above, consistent with
the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988
asons for requesting reconsideration by the Budget Committee.
e) The Budget Committee shall, at a public meeting conducted
pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, designate programs or projects, implementing
agencies, and amounts for funding which address one or more of the program
priorities specified by the Authority in subsection (a) above, consistent with
the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. The Budget Committee's decision to designate
these programs or services, implementing agencies and fund amounts shall be
based upon equal consideration of the following factors:
1) the recommendations of the Executive Director made pursuant to
subsection (b) above and written requests for reconsideration made pursuant to
subsection (d) above;
2) comments from the public and State and local officials;
3) the proven effectiveness of a program, by making a prudent
assessment of the problem to be addressed by a proposed program;
4) the likelihood that a program will achieve the desired
objectives, by making a prudent assessment of the concepts and implementation
plans included in a proposed program and by the results of any evaluations of
previous tests, demonstrations or similar programs;
5) the availability of funds; and
6) the overall cost of the program or services.
f) Pursuant to Section 503 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988,
the Application to the Bureau of Justice Assistance shall include a statewide
strategy for drug and violent crime control programs which improve the
functioning of the criminal justice system, with an emphasis on drug trafficking,
violent crime and serious offenders, and those certifications and assurances
listed in Section 503 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988
e Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988,
the Application to the Bureau of Justice Assistance shall include a statewide
strategy for drug and violent crime control programs which improve the
functioning of the criminal justice system, with an emphasis on drug trafficking,
violent crime and serious offenders, and those certifications and assurances
listed in Section 503 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988.
g) Upon notification by the Bureau of Justice Assistance that an
Application has been approved, the Executive Director shall enter into
interagency agreements with those implementing agencies designated by the
Budget Committee pursuant to subsection (e) above, specifying the terms and
conditions under which the programs or projects are to be conducted and the
federal funds are to be received. If the Authority is the designated
implementing agency, then the Executive Director shall document such terms and
conditions, which, to become effective, must be accepted in writing by the
Chairman of the Authority. The terms and conditions shall include but not be
limited to reporting requirements that reflect fiscal expenditures and progress
toward program objectives, compliance with applicable laws and regulations,
maintenance of financial and program records beyond the expiration of the
agreement, the prohibition of subcontracting or assignment of agreements
without prior written approval of the Authority, audit procedures as described
in the federal laws and regulations listed in Section 1520.50(a), and the
status of the implementing agency as an independent contractor.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.