SSR 68-24: Rescinded 1984

FederalRulings

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

Social Security Rulings › OASI › Voluntary Agreements for Coverage of State and Local Employees › SSR 68-24

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

CFR 404.1225, 404.1255, 404.1260, 404.1261, 404.1270-404.1274

SSR 68-24

Pursuant to the State's request for review under section 218(s) of the

Social Security Act, the Commissioner affirmed the assessment of interest

charges made on the basis of a finding that the State of Michigan failed

to pay timely the contributions due on an underreporting of wages, as

provided by section 218 of the Social Security Act and the Michigan

agreement for coverage of State and local employees.

The State of Michigan timely requested a review pursuant to section

218(s) of the Social Security Administration's assessment of interest

charges. The Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare

has delegated to the Commissioner of Social Security authority to make

reviews and findings and to give notice of his findings as required by

section 218(s). The assessment was made as a result of the State's failure

to pay the contributions due on an underreporting of wages discovered by

the Administration, within the time prescribed by regulations. The

position taken by the State was that additional time for paying the

contributions without interest should be allowed for "good cause."

The facts are that the Administration determined that the State failed to

report certain wages paid by the city of Williamston to one of its

employees during the period January 1, 1962, through March 31, 1966, for

services covered under the terms of the State's section 218 agreement.

Timely wage reports and contribution returns were filed by the State for

other employees of the city. An audit statement assessing the State for

contributions due on the unreported wages was issued on June 10, 1966. The

State was informed that if the underpayment was not paid on or before July

10, 1966, interest would be charged.

ered under the terms of the State's section 218 agreement.

Timely wage reports and contribution returns were filed by the State for

other employees of the city. An audit statement assessing the State for

contributions due on the unreported wages was issued on June 10, 1966. The

State was informed that if the underpayment was not paid on or before July

10, 1966, interest would be charged.

The State official, in a letter dated June 13, 1966, notified the city

officials of the amount due and requested payment by June 23. On June 29,

1966, the State official again requested payment and advised that interest

would be charged. The payment was received in the State official's office

on July 11. The State did not disagree with the substantive issued

involved and paid the Administration on July 22, 1966. Since the payment

was not made on or before July 10, the Administration on August 10, 1966,

issued a letter of assessment of interest charges to the State in the

amount of $96.93.

The Michigan section 218 coverage agreement, entered into on December 17,

1951, provides that the State will pay, at the time or times prescribed by

regulation, the appropriate contributions due on wages paid for covered

services; that the State will comply with the regulations prescribed by

the Administration to carry out the purpose of section 218; and that

failure to make payment when due will cause interest at the rate of 6

percent per annum from the date due until paid to be added as part of the

amounts due.

Subsections 218(e)(1) and 218(j) of the Social Security Act as amended;

and sections 17.803(3)(A), 17.811(11)(A), and 17.812(12) of the Michigan

Statutes, Annotated, provide the Federal and State authority,

respectively, regarding the above-described conditions of the Michigan

section 218 coverage agreement.

Social Security Administration Regulations No. 4 provide in pertinent

part as follows:

Section 404.1225. Rate of interest.

al Security Act as amended;

and sections 17.803(3)(A), 17.811(11)(A), and 17.812(12) of the Michigan

Statutes, Annotated, provide the Federal and State authority,

respectively, regarding the above-described conditions of the Michigan

section 218 coverage agreement.

Social Security Administration Regulations No. 4 provide in pertinent

part as follows:

Section 404.1225. Rate of interest.

If the contribution is not paid to the Federal Reserve Bank, or branch

thereof, when due and is not adjusted under section 404.1261, interest

accrues at the rate of 6 percent per annum.

Section 404.1255. Place and Time for Filing Contribution Return

(a) . . . the contribution return and wage report for any . . . calendar

quarter shall be filed on or before the fifteenth day of the second month

following the calendar quarter for which it is made . . . Provided,

however, that the Secretary, for good cause shown, may, upon application

by a State, allow such further time as he may deem proper for the filing

of contribution returns and wage reports for the periods for which they

are made.

Section 404.1260. Adjustment in General.

Errors in the payment of contributions must be adjusted in certain cases

without interest. Not all corrections of erroneous payments of

contributions, however, constitute adjustments within the meaning of the

regulations in this subpart. The various situations under which such

adjustments shall be made are set forth in section 404.1261 . . .

Section 404.1261. Adjustment of the Underpayment of Contributions.

nt of contributions must be adjusted in certain cases

without interest. Not all corrections of erroneous payments of

contributions, however, constitute adjustments within the meaning of the

regulations in this subpart. The various situations under which such

adjustments shall be made are set forth in section 404.1261 . . .

Section 404.1261. Adjustment of the Underpayment of Contributions.

(a) Method of Making Adjustment

*

*

*

*

*

*         *

(2) If an underpayment of contributions is due to an underreporting of or

a failure to report one or more employees on a Form OAR-S3:

*

*

*

*

*

*         *

(ii) Where the underreporting or failure to report has been ascertained

by the Social Security Administration, a notification of underpayment on

Form OAR-S9 (Audit Statement) and Form OAR-S30 (Federal Determination of

Error in State's Wage Reports) shall be forwarded to the State, and the

State may cause an adjustment of the underpayment by returning to the

Social Security Administration, within 30 days from the date of the

notification, a Form OAR-S1 prepared in accordance with the instructions

contained therein. (Form OAR-S1 is the Contribution Return.)

There is no disagreement as to the facts. It is the State's position,

however, that the interest charges should be canceled because

circumstances beyond the control of the State contributed to the delay in

payment of the assessment. The State suggests that favorable consideration

be given by the Administration to a finding of "good cause" for the

failure of the State to make the payment timely, such finding to result in

an extension to July 22, 1966, of the 30-day period for payment after

notification by the Administration of the contributions due.

The State listed the following reasons why it believes the interest

should be canceled:

hat favorable consideration

be given by the Administration to a finding of "good cause" for the

failure of the State to make the payment timely, such finding to result in

an extension to July 22, 1966, of the 30-day period for payment after

notification by the Administration of the contributions due.

The State listed the following reasons why it believes the interest

should be canceled:

- The State did not properly inform the city officials in reasonable time

that interest would be charged if payment was not made within the

prescribed time;

- The State's accounting procedures require more than the normal time to

process vouchers for payment of social security contributions; and

- The city officials did not intend to delay payment, but they did want

to satisfy themselves that the payment was justified and considerable time

lapsed before their contact with the local social security

representatives.

The State did not properly inform the city officials in reasonable time

that interest would be charged if payment was not made within the

prescribed time;

The State's accounting procedures require more than the normal time to

process vouchers for payment of social security contributions; and

In addition, the State indicated the city officials mailed the payment to

the State on July 6, but it was not delivered until July 11. The State

attributes this delay to abnormally slow mail deliveries and the fact that

the State office was closed July 9 and 10.

The State official cites the advice given in that section of the

Supplement to the Handbook for State OASIS Administrators dealing with the

provisions of section 218(s) of the Act as the basis for the request for

consideration of "good cause" for an extension of the filing time. The

section reads, in pertinent part: "There will be situations in which a

State agrees with the determination of assessment of interest but may feel

that 'good cause' exists for an extension of the filing time. . . ."

Administrators dealing with the

provisions of section 218(s) of the Act as the basis for the request for

consideration of "good cause" for an extension of the filing time. The

section reads, in pertinent part: "There will be situations in which a

State agrees with the determination of assessment of interest but may feel

that 'good cause' exists for an extension of the filing time. . . ."

The Commissioner found, on review pursuant to the State's request, that

the evidence in file established that quarterly wage reports and

contribution returns with respect to the city were filed timely for the

quarters involved and that the wages of the particular employee were not

included in those wage reports and the contributions due thereon were not

included in the contribution returns. In addition, the Commissioner found

the evidence established that this underpayment of contributions was not

adjusted in accord with the provisions of section 404.126(a)(2)(ii) of the

regulations. The Commissioner concluded that although section 404.1225(a)

of the regulations allows for extension of the filing date for quarterly

wage reports and contribution returns beyond the established period after

the end of a calendar quarter upon showing of "good cause," it does not

allow for such an extension with respect to adjustment reports an payment.

The Commissioner concluded also that pursuant to section 404.1225 interest

must be charged from the original date due on any underpayment of

contributions due ascertained by the Administration unless such

underpayment is adjusted pursuant to section 404.1261(a)(2)(ii) of the

regulations, that section requiring the payment to be made within 30 days

of the notification to the State of the underpayment by the

Administration, and that there is no regulatory or administrative

provision for granting an extension of this 30-day period for any reason.

On the basis of these findings, the Commissioner affirmed the interest

assessment.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.