SSR 67-12: SECTION 218(s). -- STATE AND LOCAL COVERAGE -- COMMISSIONER'S RULING ON STATE'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW -- INDIANA SCHOOL BUS DRIVERS
FederalRulings
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Social Security Rulings › OASI › Voluntary Agreements for Coverage of State and Local Employees › SSR 67-12
Text
20 CFR 404.1270-404.1274
SSR 67-12
Section 218(s) of the Social Security Act, as amended, provides that
where an assessment of an amount due by a State under a Federal-State
agreement has been made pursuant to section 218 or a State's claim for a
credit or refund of an overpayment under such agreement has been
disallowed or a State has been allowed a credit or refund of an
overpayment under such agreement, the Secretary shall, upon written
request filed by the State within a stipulated time, review such
assessment, disallowance or allowance stating the basis therefor. The
Secretary has delegated to the Commissioner of Social Security authority
to make reviews and findings and to give notice of his findings as
required by section 218(s).
The State of Indiana timely requested a review pursuant to section 218(s)
of the assessments made pursuant to determinations that services performed
by drivers in township-owned school buses were performed as employees of
the townships and covered under the Federal-State agreement made pursuant
to section 218.
The facts in the matter are that the drivers were engaged under standard
written contracts pursuant to the Indiana School Bus Act to transport
children to and from school; the drivers were required to perform the
services personally; the hours of service and the routes followed were
established by the townships, which also had the right to make changes in
such matters; the townships had first call on the drivers' time and
efforts; compensation for the services was in the form of a daily wage;
the drivers had no investment in the business or opportunity for profit
and loss, as the townships owned the buses and paid all the maintenance
costs; the drivers were required to comply with rules and regulations
issued by the townships; and the townships had the right to change the
drivers' methods and to direct them otherwise on how to do the work.
ces was in the form of a daily wage;
the drivers had no investment in the business or opportunity for profit
and loss, as the townships owned the buses and paid all the maintenance
costs; the drivers were required to comply with rules and regulations
issued by the townships; and the townships had the right to change the
drivers' methods and to direct them otherwise on how to do the work.
The Administration's assessments were made on the basis of its finding
that the school bus drivers were employees under the usual common-law
rules. (Regulations No. 4, sec. 404.1104 (c) sets out the rules.)
The Commissioner found, on review pursuant to the State's request, that
under these circumstances the school bus drivers were subject to control
by the townships to the extent necessary to constitute an
employer-employee relationship under the usual common-law rules. On the
basis of this finding, the Commissioner affirmed the assessments made.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.