Rule 104. Preliminary Questions

WashingtonCourt rules

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

Washington Court Rules › Rules of General Application › Rules of Evidence › ER 104

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

ER 104

PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS

(a) Questions of Admissibility Generally. Preliminary questions concerning the

qualification of a person to be a witness, the existence of a privilege, or the admissibility of

evidence shall be determined by the court, subject to the provisions of section (b). In making its

determination it is not bound by the Rules of Evidence except those with respect to privileges.

(b) Relevancy Conditioned on Fact. When the relevancy of evidence depends upon the

fulfillment of a condition of fact, the court shall admit it upon, or subject to, the introduction of

evidence sufficient to support a finding of the fulfillment of the condition.

(c) Hearing of Jury. Hearings on the admissibility of confessions shall in all cases be

conducted out of the hearing of the jury. Hearings on other preliminary matters shall be so

conducted when the interests of justice require or, when an accused is a witness and so requests.

(d) Testimony by Accused. The accused does not, by testifying upon a preliminary matter,

become subject to cross examination as to other issues in the case.

(e) Weight and Credibility. This rule does not limit the right of a party to introduce

before the jury evidence relevant to weight or credibility.

[Amended effective September 1, 1992.]

Comment 104

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.