Rule 103. Rulings on Evidence

WashingtonCourt rules

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

Washington Court Rules › Rules of General Application › Rules of Evidence › ER 103

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

ER 103

RULINGS ON EVIDENCE

(a) Effect of Erroneous Ruling. Error may not be predicated upon a ruling which admits

or excludes evidence unless a substantial right of the party is affected, and

(1) Objection. In case the ruling is one admitting evidence, a timely objection or motion to

strike is made, stating the specific ground of objection, if the specific ground was not apparent

from the context; or

(2) Offer of Proof. In case the ruling is one excluding evidence, the substance of the

evidence was made known to the court by offer or was apparent from the context within which

questions were asked.

(b) Record of Offer and Ruling. The court may add any other or further statement which

shows the character of the evidence, the form in which it was offered, the objection made, and

the ruling thereon. The court may direct the making of an offer in question and answer form.

(c) Hearing of Jury. In jury cases, proceedings shall be conducted, to the extent

practicable, so as to prevent inadmissible evidence from being suggested to the jury by any

means, such as making statements or offers of proof or asking questions in the hearing of the

jury.

(d) Errors Raised for the First Time on Review. [Reserved--See RAP 2.5(a).]

[Adopted effective April 2, 1979.]

Comment 103

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.

Rule 103. Rulings on Evidence · ER 103 | Frix