Correspondence Signature Requirements
FederalAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
USPTO MPEP › Chapter 0500 - Receipt and Handling of Mail and Papers › MPEP § 502.02
Text
37 CFR 1.4 Nature of correspondence and signature requirements.
*****
(d)
(1)
Handwritten signature.
A design patent practitioner
must indicate their design patent practitioner status by placing the word
“design” (in any format) adjacent to their handwritten signature. Each
piece of correspondence, except as provided in paragraphs (d)(2) through
(4), (e) and (f) of this section, filed in an application, patent file,
or other proceeding in the Office that requires a person’s signature,
must:
(i) Be an original, that is, have an original
handwritten signature personally signed, in permanent dark ink or
its equivalent, by that person; or
(ii) Be a direct or indirect copy, such as a photocopy
or facsimile transmission (
§ 1.6(d)
), of
an original. In the event that a copy of the original is filed, the
original should be retained as evidence of authenticity. If a
question of authenticity arises, the Office may require submission
of the original.
(2)
S-signature.
An S-signature is a signature inserted
between forward slash marks, but not a handwritten signature as defined
by paragraph (d)(1) of this section. An S-signature includes any
signature made by electronic or mechanical means, and any other mode of
making or applying a signature other than a handwritten signature as
provided for in paragraph (d)(1) of this section. Correspondence being
filed in the Office in paper, by facsimile transmission as provided in
§
1.6(d)
, or via the USPTO patent electronic filing
system as an attachment as provided in
§
1.6(a)(4)
, for a patent application, patent, or a
reexamination or supplemental examination proceeding may be S-signature
signed instead of being personally signed (
i.e.,
with
a handwritten signature) as provided for in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section. The requirements for an S-signature under this paragraph (d)(2)
of this section are as follows.
filing
system as an attachment as provided in
§
1.6(a)(4)
, for a patent application, patent, or a
reexamination or supplemental examination proceeding may be S-signature
signed instead of being personally signed (
i.e.,
with
a handwritten signature) as provided for in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section. The requirements for an S-signature under this paragraph (d)(2)
of this section are as follows.
(i) The S-signature must consist only of letters, or
Arabic numerals, or both, with appropriate spaces and commas,
periods, apostrophes, or hyphens for punctuation, and the person
signing the correspondence must insert his or her own S-signature
with a first single forward slash mark before, and a second single
forward slash mark after, the S-signature (
e.g.,
/Dr. James T. Jones, Jr./); and
(ii) A patent practitioner (
§
1.32(a)(1)
), signing pursuant to
§ 1.33(b)(1)
or
(2)
, must
supply their registration number either as part of the S-signature,
or immediately below or adjacent to the S-signature. The hash (#)
character may only be used as part of the S-signature when
appearing before a practitioner’s registration number; otherwise
the hash character may not be used in an S-signature. A design
patent practitioner must additionally indicate their design patent
practitioner status by placing the word “design” (in any format)
adjacent to the last forward slash of their S-signature.
(iii) The signer’s name must be:
(A) Presented in printed or typed form preferably
immediately below or adjacent the S-signature, and
(B) Reasonably specific enough so that the
identity of the signer can be readily recognized.
(3) Electronically submitted correspondence.
Correspondence permitted via the USPTO patent electronic filing system
may be signed by a graphic representation of a handwritten signature as
provided for in paragraph (d)(1) of this section or a graphic
representation of an S-signature as provided for in paragraph (d)(2) of
this section when it is submitted via the USPTO patent electronic filing
system.
) Electronically submitted correspondence.
Correspondence permitted via the USPTO patent electronic filing system
may be signed by a graphic representation of a handwritten signature as
provided for in paragraph (d)(1) of this section or a graphic
representation of an S-signature as provided for in paragraph (d)(2) of
this section when it is submitted via the USPTO patent electronic filing
system.
(4) Certifications—
(i) Certification as to the paper
presented. The presentation to the Office (whether by signing,
filing, submitting, or later advocating) of any paper by a party,
whether a practitioner or non-practitioner, constitutes a
certification under
§ 11.18(b)
of
this subchapter. Violations of
§ 11.18(b)(2)
of this subchapter by a party, whether a practitioner or
non-practitioner, may result in the imposition of sanctions under
§ 11.18(c)
of
this subchapter. Any practitioner violating
§
11.18(b)
of this subchapter may also be
subject to disciplinary action. See
§
11.18(d)
of this subchapter.
(ii) Certification as to the signature.
The person inserting a signature under paragraph (d)(2) or (d)(3)
of this section in a document submitted to the Office certifies
that the inserted signature appearing in the document is his or her
own signature. A person submitting a document signed by another
under paragraph (d)(2) or (d)(3) of this section is obligated to
have a reasonable basis to believe that the person whose signature
is present on the document was actually inserted by that person,
and should retain evidence of authenticity of the signature.
Violations of the certification as to the signature of another or a
person’s own signature as set forth in this paragraph may result in
the imposition of sanctions under
§ 11.18(c) and
ection is obligated to
have a reasonable basis to believe that the person whose signature
is present on the document was actually inserted by that person,
and should retain evidence of authenticity of the signature.
Violations of the certification as to the signature of another or a
person’s own signature as set forth in this paragraph may result in
the imposition of sanctions under
§ 11.18(c) and
(d)
of this chapter.
(5)
Forms.
The Office provides forms to the public to use
in certain situations to assist in the filing of correspondence for a
certain purpose and to meet certain requirements for patent applications
and proceedings. Use of the forms for purposes for which they were not
designed is prohibited. No changes to certification statements on the
Office forms (
e.g.,
oath or declaration forms,
terminal disclaimer forms, petition forms, and nonpublication request
forms) may be made. The existing text of a form, other than a
certification statement, may be modified, deleted, or added to, if all
text identifying the form as an Office form is removed. The presentation
to the Office (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later
advocating) of any Office form with text identifying the form as an
Office form by a party, whether a practitioner or non-practitioner,
constitutes a certification under
§ 11.18(b)
of this
chapter that the existing text and any certification statements on the
form have not been altered other than permitted by EFS-Web
customization.
(e) [Reserved]
(f) When a document that is required by statute to be certified
must be filed, a copy, including a photocopy or facsimile transmission, of the
certification is not acceptable.
*****
oner,
constitutes a certification under
§ 11.18(b)
of this
chapter that the existing text and any certification statements on the
form have not been altered other than permitted by EFS-Web
customization.
(e) [Reserved]
(f) When a document that is required by statute to be certified
must be filed, a copy, including a photocopy or facsimile transmission, of the
certification is not acceptable.
*****
(h)
Ratification/confirmation/evidence of authenticity:
The
Office may require ratification, confirmation (which includes submission of a
duplicate document but with a proper signature), or evidence of authenticity of
a signature, such as when the Office has reasonable doubt as to the
authenticity (veracity) of the signature,
e.g.,
where there
are variations of a signature, or where the signature and the typed or printed
name, do not clearly identify the person signing.
Correspondence filed in the Office, which requires a person’s signature,
may be filed with one of two types of signatures: (A) handwritten signature; and (B)
"S-signature."
See
37 CFR
1.4(d)
. Additionally, pursuant to
37 CFR
1.4(d)(3)
, correspondence filed via the USPTO patent electronic
filing system may be signed by a graphic representation of a handwritten signature as
provided for in
37 CFR
1.4(d)(1)
or a graphic representation of an S-signature as
provided for in
37 CFR
1.4(d)(2)
. A graphic representation of a handwritten signature may
be created by using a stylus pen and/or touch-pad. All correspondence, except for a
notice of appeal pursuant to
37 CFR 41.31
, filed in the Office
must include a signature. See
37 CFR 1.4
,
1.33
, and
11.18
.
I.
HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE
A person’s handwritten signature may be an original or a copy
thereof. The word original, as used herein, is defined as correspondence which is
personally signed in permanent dark ink or its equivalent by the person whose
signature appears thereon. Dark ink or equivalent permits traditional ink and newer
non-liquid gel type ink technologies
37 CFR 1.4
,
1.33
, and
11.18
.
I.
HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE
A person’s handwritten signature may be an original or a copy
thereof. The word original, as used herein, is defined as correspondence which is
personally signed in permanent dark ink or its equivalent by the person whose
signature appears thereon. Dark ink or equivalent permits traditional ink and newer
non-liquid gel type ink technologies. Since incoming correspondence is electronically
stored and scanned as a black and white image, a dark color is required so that the
scanned image is legible. Where copies of correspondence are acceptable, photocopies
or facsimile transmissions may be filed. For example, a photocopy or facsimile
transmission of an original of an amendment, declaration (e.g., under
37 CFR
1.63
or
1.67
), petition, issue fee
transmittal form, and authorization to charge a deposit account or a credit card may
be submitted in a patent application. Where copies are permitted, second and further
generation copies (i.e., copy of a copy) are acceptable. For example, a client may
fax a paper to an attorney and the attorney may then fax the paper to the Office,
provided the paper is eligible to be faxed (see
MPEP § 502.01
). The
original, if not submitted to the Office, should be retained as evidence of proper
execution in the event that questions arise as to the authenticity of the signature
reproduced on the photocopy or facsimile-transmitted correspondence. If a question of
authenticity arises, the Office may require submission of the original.
37 CFR
1.4(d)(1)
covers all handwritten signatures. The requirement in
37 CFR
1.4(d)(1)
of permanent dark ink or its equivalent relates to
whether a handwritten signature is compliant and is not limiting on the type of
handwritten signature that is covered by
37 CFR 1.4(d)(1)
. Thus,
37 CFR
1.4(d)(1)
would cover handwritten signatures in red ink or in
pencil; although, under
37 CFR 1.4(d)(1)
neither would be
acceptable since red ink is not dark, and pencil is not permanent
1.4(d)(1)
of permanent dark ink or its equivalent relates to
whether a handwritten signature is compliant and is not limiting on the type of
handwritten signature that is covered by
37 CFR 1.4(d)(1)
. Thus,
37 CFR
1.4(d)(1)
would cover handwritten signatures in red ink or in
pencil; although, under
37 CFR 1.4(d)(1)
neither would be
acceptable since red ink is not dark, and pencil is not permanent. A scanned image of
a document that contains a handwritten signature filed via the USPTO patent
electronic filing system is permitted as a copy under
37 CFR
1.4(d)(1)(ii)
. A signature applied by an electric or mechanical
typewriter directly to paper is not a handwritten signature, which is applied by
hand. Accordingly, if a typewriter applied signature is used, it must meet the
requirements of
37
CFR 1.4(d)(2)
. Adding forward slashes to a handwritten (or
hand-printed) ink signature that is personally applied will not cause the signature
to be treated under
37 CFR 1.4(d)(2)
. Such a signature will be treated under
37 CFR
1.4(d)(1)
with the slashes ignored. The end product from a
manually applied hand stamp or from a signature replication or transfer means (such
as by pen or by screen) appears to be a handwritten signature, but is not actually
handwritten, and would be treated under
37 CFR 1.4(d)(2)
. An electronic
reproduction of a handwritten signature, e.g., scanned, that is electronically
applied to a document is not a personally signed original document under
37 CFR
1.4(d)(1)(i)
and reproductions of such correspondence cannot be
copies under
37 CFR
1.4(d)(1)(ii)
. A graphic representation of a handwritten
signature as provided for in
37 CFR 1.4(d)(1)
will be accepted
when submitted via the USPTO patent electronic filing system, pursuant to
37 CFR
1.4(d)(3)
.
37 CFR 1.4(d)(1)
further requires
that a design patent practitioner must indicate their design patent practitioner
status by placing the word “design” (in any format) adjacent to their handwritten
signature.
II
c representation of a handwritten
signature as provided for in
37 CFR 1.4(d)(1)
will be accepted
when submitted via the USPTO patent electronic filing system, pursuant to
37 CFR
1.4(d)(3)
.
37 CFR 1.4(d)(1)
further requires
that a design patent practitioner must indicate their design patent practitioner
status by placing the word “design” (in any format) adjacent to their handwritten
signature.
II.
S-SIGNATURE
The second type of signature is an S-signature. See
37 CFR
1.4(d)(2)
. An S-signature is a signature inserted between
forward slash marks, but not a handwritten signature as defined by
37 CFR
1.4(d)(1)
. An S-signature includes any signature made by
electronic or mechanical means, and any other mode of making or applying a signature
not covered by either a handwritten signature of
37 CFR 1.4(d)(1)
. The S-signature
can be used with correspondence e.g., oaths and affidavits filed in the Office in
paper, by facsimile transmission as provided in
37 CFR 1.6(d)
, or via the USPTO
patent electronic filing system as an attachment as provided in
37 CFR
1.6(a)(4)
, for a patent application, a patent, or a
reexamination or supplemental examination proceeding.
37 CFR 1.4(d)
does not authorize filing correspondence by email. A legible electronic image of a
handwritten signature inserted, or copied and pasted by the person signing the
correspondence into the correspondence may be considered to be an acceptable
signature under
37
CFR 1.4(d)(2)
provided the signature is surrounded by a first
single forward slash mark before the electronic image and a second single forward
slash mark after the electronic image and includes the signers name below or adjacent
to the signature as required.
An S-signature must consist only of letters, or Arabic numerals, or
both, with appropriate spaces and punctuation (i.e., commas, periods, apostrophes, or
hyphens).
"Letters"
ure is surrounded by a first
single forward slash mark before the electronic image and a second single forward
slash mark after the electronic image and includes the signers name below or adjacent
to the signature as required.
An S-signature must consist only of letters, or Arabic numerals, or
both, with appropriate spaces and punctuation (i.e., commas, periods, apostrophes, or
hyphens).
"Letters"
include
English and non- English alphabet letters, and text characters (e.g., Kanji).
Non-text, graphic characters (e.g., a smiley face created in the True Type Wing Dings
font) are not permitted.
"Arabic
numerals"
are the numerals 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9,
which are the standard numerals used in the United States. To accommodate as many
varieties of names as possible, a signer may select any combination of letters,
Arabic numerals, or both, for their S-signature under
37 CFR
1.4(d)(2)(i)
. The person signing the correspondence must insert
their own S-signature with a first single forward slash mark before, and a second
single forward slash mark after, the S-signature (e.g., /Dr. James T. Jones, Jr./).
Additional forward slashes are not permitted as part of the S-signature. The
presentation of just letters and Arabic numerals as an S-signature without the
S-signature being placed between two forward slashes will be treated as an unsigned
document. A design patent practitioner must indicate their design patent practitioner
status by placing the word “design” (in any format) adjacent to the last forward
slash of their S-signature.
Commas, periods, apostrophes, and hyphens are often found in names
and will therefore be found in many S-signatures. These punctuation marks and
appropriate spaces may be used with letters and Arabic numerals in an S-signature. A
sample S-signature including punctuation marks and spaces, between two forward
slashes, is: /John P. Doe/. Punctuation marks,
per se,
are not
punctuation and are not permitted without proper association with letters and Arabic
numerals
s
and will therefore be found in many S-signatures. These punctuation marks and
appropriate spaces may be used with letters and Arabic numerals in an S-signature. A
sample S-signature including punctuation marks and spaces, between two forward
slashes, is: /John P. Doe/. Punctuation marks,
per se,
are not
punctuation and are not permitted without proper association with letters and Arabic
numerals. An S-signature of only punctuation marks would be improper (e.g., /- - -/).
In addition, punctuation marks, such as question marks (e.g., /???/), are often
utilized to represent an intent not to sign a document and may be interpreted to be a
non-
bona fide
attempt at a signature, in addition to being
improper.
Script fonts are not permitted for any portion of a document except
the S-signature. See
37 CFR 1.52(b)(2)(ii)
.
Presentation of a typed name in a script font without the typed name being placed
between the required slashes does not present the proper indicia manifesting an
intent to sign and will be treated as an unsigned document.
37 CFR
1.4(d)(2)(i)
also defines who can insert an S-signature into a
document.
37 CFR
1.4(d)(2)(i)
requires that a person, which includes a
practitioner, must insert their own signature using letters and/or Arabic numerals,
with appropriate commas, periods, apostrophes, or hyphens as punctuation and spaces.
The “must insert his or her own signature” requirement is met by the signer directly
typing their own signature using a keyboard. The requirement does not permit one
person (e.g., a secretary) to type in the signature of a second person (e.g., a
practitioner) even if the second person directs the first person to do so. A person
physically unable to use a keyboard, however, may, while simultaneously reviewing the
document for signature, direct another person to press the appropriate keys to form
the S-signature
ng a keyboard. The requirement does not permit one
person (e.g., a secretary) to type in the signature of a second person (e.g., a
practitioner) even if the second person directs the first person to do so. A person
physically unable to use a keyboard, however, may, while simultaneously reviewing the
document for signature, direct another person to press the appropriate keys to form
the S-signature.
A signature which is created using a commercial
signing system may be acceptable under
37 CFR
1.4(d)(2)
if the signature is inserted between forward slash
marks or under
37 CFR 1.4(d)(3)
if the signature
is a graphic representation of either a handwritten signature or an S-signature and
submitted via the USPTO patent electronic filing system.
37 CFR
1.4(d)(3)
does not apply to documents submitted in paper.
For consistency purposes, and to avoid raising a doubt as to who has
signed, the same S-signature should be utilized each time, with variations of the
signature being avoided. The signer should review any indicia of identity of the
signer in the body of the document, including any printed or typed name and
registration number, to ensure that the indicia of identity in the body of the
document is consistent with how the document is S-signed. Knowingly adopting an
S-signature of another is not permitted.
While an S-signature need not be the name of the signer of the
document, the Office strongly suggests that each signer use an S-signature that has
their full name. The Office expects that where persons do not sign with their name it
will be because they are using an S-signature that is the usual S-signature for that
person, which is their own signature, and not something that is employed to obfuscate
or misidentify the signer. Titles may be used with the signer’s S-signature and must
be placed between the slash marks (e.g., /Dr. John Doe/), or with the printed or
typed version of the name.
37 CFR
1.4(d)(2)(ii)
requires that a practitioner (
37 CFR
1.32(a)(1)
) signing pursuant to
37 CFR
1.33(b)(1)
or
for that
person, which is their own signature, and not something that is employed to obfuscate
or misidentify the signer. Titles may be used with the signer’s S-signature and must
be placed between the slash marks (e.g., /Dr. John Doe/), or with the printed or
typed version of the name.
37 CFR
1.4(d)(2)(ii)
requires that a practitioner (
37 CFR
1.32(a)(1)
) signing pursuant to
37 CFR
1.33(b)(1)
or
(b)(2)
must place their
registration number, either as part of, or adjacent, their S-signature. A hash (#)
character may only be used in an S-signature if it is prior to a practitioner’s
registration number that is part of the S-signature. A design patent practitioner
must additionally indicate their design patent practitioner status by placing the
word “design” (in any format) adjacent to the last forward slash of their
S-signature. For an application filed on or after September 16, 2012, when a
practitioner is signing as an applicant as defined in
37 CFR 1.42
(e.g., as an inventor), a registration number is not required and should not be
supplied to avoid confusion as to which basis the practitioner is signing, e.g., as a
practitioner or as the applicant. A patent practitioner signing on behalf of a
juristic entity applicant (see
37 CFR 1.33(b)(3)
) is signing as a patent
practitioner and thus must provide their registration number. For applications filed
before September 16, 2012, when a practitioner is signing as an applicant as defined
in
pre-AIA 37 CFR
1.41
or as an assignee a registration number is not required
and should not be supplied for the reasons noted above.
The signer’s name must be (A) presented in printed or typed form
preferably immediately below or adjacent the S-signature, and (B) reasonably specific
enough so that the identity of the signer can be readily recognized. See
37 CFR
1.4(d)(2)(iii)(A)
. The printed or typed name requirement is
intended to describe any manner of applying the signer’s name to the document,
including by a typewriter or machine printer
me must be (A) presented in printed or typed form
preferably immediately below or adjacent the S-signature, and (B) reasonably specific
enough so that the identity of the signer can be readily recognized. See
37 CFR
1.4(d)(2)(iii)(A)
. The printed or typed name requirement is
intended to describe any manner of applying the signer’s name to the document,
including by a typewriter or machine printer. It could include a printer (mechanical,
electrical, optical, etc.) associated with a computer or a facsimile machine but
would not include manual or hand printing. See
37 CFR 1.52(a)(1)(iv)
. The
printed or typed name may be inserted before or after the S-signature is applied, and
it does not have to be inserted by the S-signer. A printed or typed name appearing in
the letterhead or body of a document is not acceptable as the presentation of the
name of the S-signer. A graphic representation of an S-signature as provided for in
37 CFR
1.4(d)(2)
will be accepted when submitted via the USPTO patent
electronic filing system, pursuant to
37 CFR 1.4(d)(3)
.
III.
CERTIFICATIONS
37 CFR
1.4(d)(4)(i)
establishes that the presentation to the Office
(whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) of any paper by a
party, whether a practitioner or non- practitioner, constitutes a certification under
37 CFR
11.18(b)
of this chapter.
37 CFR
1.4(d)(4)(ii)
establishes certifications as to the signature of
another for a person submitting a document signed by another under
37 CFR
1.4(d)(2)
or
37 CFR 1.4(d)(3)
. Thus, the
submitting person is obligated to have a reasonable basis to believe that the person
whose signature is present on the document actually inserted the signature on the
document. Such reasonable basis does not require an actual knowledge but does require
some reason to believe the signature is appropriate
submitting a document signed by another under
37 CFR
1.4(d)(2)
or
37 CFR 1.4(d)(3)
. Thus, the
submitting person is obligated to have a reasonable basis to believe that the person
whose signature is present on the document actually inserted the signature on the
document. Such reasonable basis does not require an actual knowledge but does require
some reason to believe the signature is appropriate. For example, where a
practitioner emails a
37 CFR 1.63
declaration to an
inventor for signature by the inventor and receives an executed declaration by the
inventor in return from the inventor, reasonable basis would exist. Evidence of
authenticity should be retained. This may involve retaining the emails sent to the
inventor and any cover letter or email (with the signed document as an attachment)
back to the practitioner from the inventor in the example relating to execution of a
37 CFR
1.63
declaration.
37 CFR
1.4(d)(4)(ii)
further establishes that a person inserting a
signature under
37
CFR 1.4(d)(2)
or
37 CFR 1.4(d)(3)
in a document
submitted to the Office certifies that the inserted signature appearing in the
document is their own signature. This is meant to prohibit a first person from
requesting a second person to insert the first person’s signature in a document.
While the certification is directed at the person inserting another S- signature, the
person requesting the inappropriate insertion may also be subject to sanctions.
37 CFR
1.4(d)(4)(ii)
additionally establishes that violations of the
certifications as to the signature of another or a person’s own signature, set forth
in
37 CFR
1.4(d)(4)(ii)
, may result in the imposition of sanctions under
37 CFR 11.18(c)
and (d)
.
IV.
RATIFICATION, CONFIRMATION, OR EVIDENCE OF AUTHENTICITY
Pursuant to
37 CFR 1.4(h)
, the Office may
additionally inquire in regard to a signature so as to identify the signer and
clarify the record where the identity of the signer is unclear
ature of another or a person’s own signature, set forth
in
37 CFR
1.4(d)(4)(ii)
, may result in the imposition of sanctions under
37 CFR 11.18(c)
and (d)
.
IV.
RATIFICATION, CONFIRMATION, OR EVIDENCE OF AUTHENTICITY
Pursuant to
37 CFR 1.4(h)
, the Office may
additionally inquire in regard to a signature so as to identify the signer and
clarify the record where the identity of the signer is unclear. An example of when
ratification or confirmation of a signature may be required is when there are
variations in a signature or whenever a name in an S-signature is not exactly the
same as the name indicated as an inventor, or a practitioner of record. Hence,
whatever signature is adopted by a signer, that signature should be consistently used
on all documents. Also addressed is the treatment of variations in a signature or
where a printed or typed name accompanies the S-signature but the identity of the
signer is unclear. In such cases, the Office may require ratification or confirmation
of a signature. Ratification requires the person ratifying to state they personally
signed the previously submitted document as well as, if needed, the submission of a
compliant format of the signature. Confirmation includes submitting a duplicate
document, which is compliantly signed if the previous signature was noncompliant (as
opposed to unclear). Where it is necessary to ratify the signatures on multiple
previously submitted documents, the ratification paper should include an itemized
list of the documents and their filing dates.
In lieu of ratification, the Office may require a resubmission of a
properly signed duplicate document. Resubmission of a document may be required, for
example, where ratification alone is inappropriate, such as where the image of the
signature is of such poor quality (e.g., illegible font) that the Office is unable to
store or reproduce the document with the signature image.
Ratification or confirmation alone does not provide a means for
changing the name of a signer
erly signed duplicate document. Resubmission of a document may be required, for
example, where ratification alone is inappropriate, such as where the image of the
signature is of such poor quality (e.g., illegible font) that the Office is unable to
store or reproduce the document with the signature image.
Ratification or confirmation alone does not provide a means for
changing the name of a signer. For example, when an inventor changes their name and
the inventor desires to change their name in the nonprovisional application, such
change must be by way of a request under
37 CFR 1.48(f)
.
See
MPEP
§§ 602.01(c)(2)
and
602.08(b)
.
In addition, the Office may require evidence of authenticity where
the Office has reasonable doubt as to the authenticity (veracity) of the signature.
Evidence of authenticity may include evidence establishing a chain of custody of a
document from the person signing the document to the person filing the document.
Proper evidence of a chain of custody will aid in avoiding the impact of repudiation
of a signature.
Where there has been a
bona fide
attempt to follow
the rule, but where there is some doubt as to the identity of the signer of a signed
document, the Office may require ratification of the signature. Note, ratification
would only be an effective remedy if the signer was a proper party to have executed
the document to be ratified. For example, a practitioner of record may ratify their
signature on an amendment, but not the signature of a secretary who is not a
practitioner or inventor in the application. A registered practitioner may, however,
ratify the amendment made by another registered practitioner but may not ratify a
document required to be signed by an inventor, such as a
37 CFR 1.63
declaration
ment to be ratified. For example, a practitioner of record may ratify their
signature on an amendment, but not the signature of a secretary who is not a
practitioner or inventor in the application. A registered practitioner may, however,
ratify the amendment made by another registered practitioner but may not ratify a
document required to be signed by an inventor, such as a
37 CFR 1.63
declaration. Similarly, an inadvertent typographical error or simple misspelling of a
name will be treated as a
bona fide
attempt to follow the rule,
which would require ratification only where there is some doubt as to the identity of
the signer rather than be treated as an unsigned paper requiring resubmission. Where
there is an obvious typographical error so that the Office does not have some doubt
as to the identity of the signer (and therefore notification to applicant is not
needed), further action by applicant would not be required and, where appropriate,
the obvious error will be noted in the record.
The inadvertent failure to follow the format and content of an
S-signature will be treated as a
bona fide
attempt at a signature
but the paper will be considered as being unsigned correspondence. Examples of
correspondence that will be treated as unsigned are (A) the S-signature is not
enclosed in forward slashes, (B) the S-signature is composed of non-text graphic
characters (e.g., a smiley face) and not letters and numerals, and (C) the
S-signature is not a name and there is no other accompanying name adjacent or below
the S-signature so that the identity of the signer cannot be readily recognized.
If the signer, after being required to ratify or resubmit a document
with a compliant signature, repeats the same S-signature in reply without appropriate
correction, the reply will not be considered to be a
bona fide
attempt to reply, and no additional time period will be given to submit a properly
signed document.
V
the S-signature so that the identity of the signer cannot be readily recognized.
If the signer, after being required to ratify or resubmit a document
with a compliant signature, repeats the same S-signature in reply without appropriate
correction, the reply will not be considered to be a
bona fide
attempt to reply, and no additional time period will be given to submit a properly
signed document.
V.
CERTIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS PROVIDED FOR BY STATUTE
When a statute requires or permits the Director to require a document
to be certified (such as the requirement in
37 CFR 1.55
for a certified copy
of a foreign patent application pursuant to
35 U.S.C. 119
or a certified copy
of an international application pursuant to
35 U.S.C. 365
) a copy of the
certification, including a photocopy or facsimile transmission, will not be
acceptable. Note that for applications filed under
35 U.S.C.
111(a)
, foreign priority documents retrieved by the Office from
a foreign intellectual property office that participates with the Office in a
priority document exchange (PDX) agreement can serve as the certified copy provided
the requirements of
37 CFR 1.55(h)
are met. The
requirement for an original certification does not apply to certifications such as
required under
37
CFR 1.8
since these certifications are not provided for by
statute.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.