Patent Term Adjustment Determination
FederalAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
USPTO MPEP › Chapter 2700 - Patent Terms, Adjustments, and Extensions › MPEP § 2733
Text
[Editor Note:
37 CFR
1.705(a)
below includes amendments applicable only to patents
granted on or after January 14, 2013. See
37 CFR 1.705(a) (pre‑2013‑04‑01)
with respect to patents granted prior to January 14, 2013.]
37 CFR 1.705 Patent term adjustment determination.
(a) The patent will include notification of any patent term
adjustment under
35 U.S.C. 154(b)
.
*****
The AIA Technical Corrections Act was enacted on January 14, 2013. See
Public Law 112-274, 126 Stat. 2456 (2013). Section 1(h) of the AIA Technical Corrections
Act revises the patent term adjustment provisions of
35 U.S.C. 154(b)
and is effective for
any patent granted on or after January 14, 2013. Section 1(h)(2) of the AIA Technical
Corrections Act amended
35 U.S.C. 154(b)(3)(B)(i)
to change “shall transmit a notice of that
[patent term adjustment] determination with the written notice of allowance of the
application under
section
151
” to “shall transmit a notice of that [patent term adjustment]
determination no later than the date of issuance of the patent.” See 126 Stat. at 2457.
This change eliminates the need for the Office to provide an initial patent term adjustment
determination with the notice of allowance and before the patent term adjustment under
35 U.S.C.
154(b)(1)(A)(iv)
and
154(b)(1)(B)
is known. See
Changes to Implement Patent Term Adjustment Under Twenty-Year Patent
Term,
65 FR 56365, 56374 (September 18, 2000) (explaining that a two-part
process is required because the Office is obliged under
35 U.S.C. 154(b)(3)
to provide a patent
term adjustment determination before the issue date, and thus the patent term adjustment,
is known).
37 CFR 1.705(a)
has been amended to reflect that the Office will
provide notification of the patent term adjustment on the patent. The Office will no longer
provide a notification of the patent term adjustment with the mailing of the notice of
allowance for any patent granted on or after January 14, 2013.
The Office has revised
37 CFR 1.705
to implement the statutory
changes to
35 U.S.C
is known).
37 CFR 1.705(a)
has been amended to reflect that the Office will
provide notification of the patent term adjustment on the patent. The Office will no longer
provide a notification of the patent term adjustment with the mailing of the notice of
allowance for any patent granted on or after January 14, 2013.
The Office has revised
37 CFR 1.705
to implement the statutory
changes to
35 U.S.C.
154(b)(3)(B)(i)
. The amendment to the statute provides that the
Office shall transmit a determination of the patent term adjustment no later than the date
of issuance of the patent. Accordingly, the Office is no longer required to transmit a
determination at the time of the mailing of the notice of allowance which occurs before all
of the guarantees of the statute could be calculated. The Office, however, will continue to
provide a preliminary patent term adjustment calculation with the issue notification that
is mailed to applicant prior to issuance of the patent, but the patent term adjustment
indicated on the patent is the “official” notification of the Office’s patent term
adjustment determination under
35 U.S.C. 154(b)
. Accordingly, patentee
should wait until the grant of the patent to determine whether or not a request for
reconsideration of the patent term adjustment indicated on the patent is warranted. See
MPEP §
2734
for a discussion of the requirements of any such
request.
If a registered practitioner receives a patent term adjustment indicated
on the front of the patent that is longer than expected, the practitioner may disclose the
error to the Office in a letter in compliance with the practitioner’s duty of candor and
good faith in practice before the Office. The Office will treat letters submitted by
patentees stating that Office’s determination of patent term adjustment indicated on the
patent is greater than what the applicant or patentee believes is appropriate by placing
these letters in the file of the patent without comment
o the Office in a letter in compliance with the practitioner’s duty of candor and
good faith in practice before the Office. The Office will treat letters submitted by
patentees stating that Office’s determination of patent term adjustment indicated on the
patent is greater than what the applicant or patentee believes is appropriate by placing
these letters in the file of the patent without comment. See
Treatment of Letters
Stating That the USPTO’s Patent Term Adjustment Determination Is Greater Than What the
Applicant or Patentee Believes Is Appropriate
, 75 FR 42079 (July 20, 2010),
1357 OG 262 (August 24, 2010). The Office will not review these letters or issue
certificates of correction under either
35 U.S.C. 254
or
255
on the basis of
these letters. In addition, the Office will not grant a request for a certificate of
correction under either
35 U.S.C. 254
or
255
to revise the patent term
adjustment indicated in a patent, unless the certificate of correction is issued to revise
the patent for consistency with (1) the patent term adjustment determined via a decision on
the request for reconsideration under
37 CFR 1.705
; or (2) the total patent
term adjustment indicated on the USPTO patent electronic filing system screen that displays
the patent term adjustment calculation for the patent. If patentee submits a request for a
certificate of correction under either
35 U.S.C. 254
or
255
to revise the
patent term adjustment indicated in a patent that also includes changes in the patent for
which a certificate of correction would be appropriate, the request for a certificate of
correction will not be granted unless the patentee submits a new request for a certificate
of correction that does not also attempt to revise the patent term adjustment indicated in
the patent.
If patentee wants the Office to reconsider its patent term
adjustment determination, the patentee must use the procedures set forth in
37 CFR
1.705(b)
for requesting reconsideration of a patent term adjustment
determination
ot be granted unless the patentee submits a new request for a certificate
of correction that does not also attempt to revise the patent term adjustment indicated in
the patent.
If patentee wants the Office to reconsider its patent term
adjustment determination, the patentee must use the procedures set forth in
37 CFR
1.705(b)
for requesting reconsideration of a patent term adjustment
determination. Specifically, the procedures set forth in
37 CFR
1.705(b)
must be used whether the USPTO’s patent term adjustment
determination is greater than or less than the adjustment that the applicant or patentee
believes to be appropriate.
A patentee may also file a terminal disclaimer at any time
disclaiming any period considered in excess of the appropriate patent term adjustment. See
35 U.S.C.
253
and
37 CFR 1.321
.
Note that the Office does not require patentee to file either
a request for reconsideration under
37 CFR 1.705(b)
or a terminal
disclaimer when the patent term adjustment indicated on the patent is greater than what the
patentee believes is appropriate. As discussed above, the patentee or the appointed
registered practitioner may disclose the alleged error to the Office in a letter in
compliance with the practitioner’s duty of candor and good faith.
Information as to how the patent term adjustment calculation has been made
will be available through the USPTO patent electronic filing system at
www.uspto.gov/PatentCenter
.
Applicants may routinely use the USPTO patent electronic filing system to check the
accuracy of the data entered in the OPSG system for their applications (i.e., the type of
the paper and date of receipt in the Office) throughout prosecution. If any errors are
detected, they should be brought to the Office’s attention (e.g., by contacting the
examiner or the Technology Center’s customer service representative) as soon as possible to
ensure that they are corrected before allowance of the application and the determination of
the patent term adjustment
(i.e., the type of
the paper and date of receipt in the Office) throughout prosecution. If any errors are
detected, they should be brought to the Office’s attention (e.g., by contacting the
examiner or the Technology Center’s customer service representative) as soon as possible to
ensure that they are corrected before allowance of the application and the determination of
the patent term adjustment. In checking Office records, applicants should keep in mind that
the date that should be recorded in the Office computer records is the date of receipt of
the paper, not the date that it was mailed under
37 CFR 1.8
. In addition, if an original
paper is misplaced by the Office and a duplicate is filed with a post card receipt showing
the date of receipt of the original paper, the date shown on the post-card receipt for the
original paper is the date that should be shown in the Office computer records. If Priority
Mail Express
®
service was used, then the date shown as the “date
accepted” on the Priority Mail Express
®
label will be entered
into the Office computer records. Otherwise, the date reflected in the Office computer
records for a duplicate copy of correspondence will normally be the date that the duplicate
was received in the Office.
[top]
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.