Special Acceptance of Maintenance Fee Payments Containing Informalities
FederalAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
USPTO MPEP › Chapter 2500 - Maintenance Fees › MPEP § 2530
Text
It is strongly recommended that a maintenance fee submission by mail or
facsimile include both a telephone number and a mailing address for the fee submitter
because, provided the fee is sufficient, the Office may attempt to contact the submitter
by telephone and/or by mail to confirm the patent to which the fee is to be applied. If
the Office specially accepts a payment under any one of scenarios I – III below, a
Notice of Special Acceptance of Patent Maintenance Fee (PTO-2143) will be mailed to the
submitter that identifies the patent number and application number to which the
maintenance fee was applied and requests the submitter to verify that the payment was
applied as intended. If the payment was not applied to the intended patent, a petition
(such as a petition under
37 CFR 1.377
) must be filed. If the
petition is not filed within 2 months of the date of the notice (PTO-2143), the petition
may be dismissed as untimely, and relief may have to be pursued under
37 CFR 1.378(a)
-
(c)
.
I.
PATENT NUMBER SUPPLIED BUT NO APPLICATION NUMBER SUPPLIED
If a maintenance fee payment identifies only the patent number
(i.e., does not identify the application number for the patent on which the
maintenance fee is being paid), the Office may apply the payment to the patent
identified by the patent number in the payment or may return the payment. See
37 CFR
1.366(c)
.
II.
PATENT NUMBER AND APPLICATION NUMBER SUPPLIED BUT THEY DO NOT
CORRESPOND
When a patent number and an application number are both supplied,
but they do not correspond to the same patent, the Office will generally apply the
payment to the patent identified by the patent number, if possible. Even if the
payment is sufficient and timely to pay the maintenance fee due in the patent
identified by the patent number, the Office may return the payment if additional
information on the payment submission is inconsistent with the patent identified by
the patent number
ond to the same patent, the Office will generally apply the
payment to the patent identified by the patent number, if possible. Even if the
payment is sufficient and timely to pay the maintenance fee due in the patent
identified by the patent number, the Office may return the payment if additional
information on the payment submission is inconsistent with the patent identified by
the patent number. The Office may even apply the payment to the patent identified by
the application number if the additional information corroborates that patent. Such
may be the case, for example, where the fee submitter is the addressee named in the
correspondence address or fee address of the patent identified by the application
number.
III.
NO PATENT NUMBER SUPPLIED BUT APPLICATION NUMBER SUPPLIED
If a maintenance fee is due on the patent identified by the
application number and the payment submitted is sufficient, the Office may apply the
payment to the patent (provided additional corroborating information is present) or
may return the payment.
[top]
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.