Ex Parte Reexamination
FederalAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
USPTO MPEP › Chapter 2200 - Citation of Prior Art and Ex Parte Reexamination of Patents › MPEP § 2209
Text
Procedures for reexamination of issued patents began on July 1, 1981, the
date when the reexamination provisions of Public Law 96-517 came into effect.
The reexamination statute,
35 U.S.C. 302
, and rules permit any
person to file a request for an
ex parte
reexamination containing
certain elements and the appropriate fee under
37 CFR 1.20(c)(1) or (c)(2)
. The Office
initially determines if “a substantial new question of patentability” (
35 U.S.C. 303(a)
) is
presented. If such a new question has been presented, reexamination will be ordered. The
reexamination proceedings which follow the order for reexamination are very similar to
regular examination procedures in patent applications; however, there are notable
differences. For example, there are certain limitations as to the kind of rejections which
may be made in a reexamination ordered under
35 U.S.C. 304
, special reexamination
forms to be used, and time periods set to provide “special dispatch.” When the prosecution
of a reexamination proceeding is terminated, a reexamination certificate is issued which
indicates the status of all claims following the reexamination.
The following sections of this chapter explain the details of
reexamination.
The intent of the reexamination procedures covered in this chapter include
the following:
(A) To provide procedures for reexamination of patents;
(B) To implement reexamination in an essentially
ex
parte
manner;
(C) To minimize the processing costs and complexities of
reexamination;
(D) To maximize respect for the reexamined patent;
(E) To provide procedures for prompt and timely determinations by the
Office in accordance with the “special dispatch” requirements of
35 U.S.C.
305
.
The basic characteristics of
ex parte
reexamination
are as follows:
(A) Anyone can request reexamination at any time during the period of
enforceability of the patent;
(B) In
ex parte
reexaminations ordered under
35 U.S.C
for the reexamined patent;
(E) To provide procedures for prompt and timely determinations by the
Office in accordance with the “special dispatch” requirements of
35 U.S.C.
305
.
The basic characteristics of
ex parte
reexamination
are as follows:
(A) Anyone can request reexamination at any time during the period of
enforceability of the patent;
(B) In
ex parte
reexaminations ordered under
35 U.S.C.
304
, prior art considered during reexamination is limited to
prior art patents or printed publications applied under the appropriate parts of
35 U.S.C.
102
and
103
. Patents may also be applied
in a double patenting rejection as discussed in
MPEP § 2258
subsection I.D. (However, in
ex parte
reexaminations ordered under
35
U.S.C. 257
, the prior art considered during reexamination is
not limited. See
MPEP § 2801
);
(C) A substantial new question of patentability must be present for
reexamination to be ordered;
(D) If ordered, the actual reexamination proceeding is
ex
parte
in nature;
(E) Decision on a request for reexamination submitted under
35 U.S.C.
302
must be made no later than 3 months from its filing, and
the remainder of the proceeding must proceed with “special dispatch” within the
Office. (Similarly, a decision on a request for supplemental examination submitted
under
35
U.S.C. 257
must be made no later than 3 months from its filing
(see
MPEP
§ 2815
), and any
ex parte
reexamination
proceeding ordered as a result of a supplemental examination proceeding must proceed
with “special dispatch” within the Office);
(F) If ordered, a reexamination proceeding will normally be conducted to
its conclusion and the issuance of a reexamination certificate;
(G) The scope of a claim cannot be enlarged by amendment;
(H) All reexamination and patent files are open to the public, but see
paragraph (I) below;
(I) The reexamination file is scanned into IFW to provide an electronic
format copy of the file
thin the Office);
(F) If ordered, a reexamination proceeding will normally be conducted to
its conclusion and the issuance of a reexamination certificate;
(G) The scope of a claim cannot be enlarged by amendment;
(H) All reexamination and patent files are open to the public, but see
paragraph (I) below;
(I) The reexamination file is scanned into IFW to provide an electronic
format copy of the file. All public access to and copying of the reexamination file
may be made from the electronic format copy available through Patent Center. Any
remaining paper files are
not
available to the public. Images
of non-patent literature (NPL) cited in public files are not available for either
viewing or downloading through Patent Center. Certified copies of the full contents
of the files, including NPL, are available from the Patent and Trademark Copy
Fulfillment Branch of the Public Records Division, and may be ordered online through
the Certified Copy Center storefront at
https://certifiedcopycenter.uspto.gov
.
For a discussion of public access to papers filed in a supplemental
examination proceeding, see
MPEP § 2803.02
.
Parties are cautioned that the reexamination statute,
regulations, and published examining procedures do not countenance so-called “litigation
tactics” in reexamination proceedings. The parties are expected to conduct themselves
accordingly. For example, it is expected that submissions of papers that are not provided
for in the reexamination regulations and/or appear to be excluded by the regulation will
either be filed with an appropriate petition to accept the paper and/or waive the
regulation(s), or not filed at all. Parties are advised that multiple submissions, such as
a reply to a paper opposing a petition and a sur-reply directed to such a reply are not
provided for in the reexamination regulations or examining procedures. It is expected that
the parties will adhere to the provisions of
37 CFR 11.18(b)
throughout the course
of a reexamination proceeding.
[top]
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.