Entry of Court Decision in Patent File
FederalAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
USPTO MPEP › Chapter 2200 - Citation of Prior Art and Ex Parte Reexamination of Patents › MPEP § 2207
Text
The Solicitor’s Office processes
notices
required by
35 U.S.C.
290
, received from the clerks of the various courts in the United
States, and has them entered in the patent file. However, it is considered desirable that
the
entire court decision
be supplied to the Office for entry into the
patent file. Accordingly, the Office will accept at
any time
from
any party
for placement in the patent file, submissions of the
following: copies of notices of suits, copies of notices regarding other proceedings
involving the patent and copies of decisions from litigation or other proceedings involving
the patent. The Office will accept for entry into the patent file other court papers, or
papers filed in the court, from litigation or other proceedings involving the patent. The
decisions from litigation or other proceedings include final court decisions (even if the
decision is still appealable), decisions to vacate, decisions to remand, and decisions as
to the merits of the patent claims. Non-merit decisions (e.g., on motions for a new venue,
a new trial/discovery date, or sanctions) will not be entered and will be expunged from the
patent file by closing the appropriate paper if they were entered before recognizing their
nature. Further, papers filed in the court from litigation or other proceedings involving
the patent will not be entered into the patent file (and will be expunged if already
entered) if they provide a party’s arguments (e.g., a memorandum in support of summary
judgment). If the argument has an entry right in the reexamination proceeding, it must be
submitted via the proper procedural vehicle (provision(s) of the rules) that provides for
their entry. It is not required nor is it permitted that parties submit copies of copending
reexamination proceedings and applications (which copies can be mistaken for a new
request/filing); rather, submitters may provide a notice identifying the
application/proceeding number and its status
eding, it must be
submitted via the proper procedural vehicle (provision(s) of the rules) that provides for
their entry. It is not required nor is it permitted that parties submit copies of copending
reexamination proceedings and applications (which copies can be mistaken for a new
request/filing); rather, submitters may provide a notice identifying the
application/proceeding number and its status. Any submission that is not permitted entry
will be returned, expunged, or discarded, at the sole discretion of the Office.
It is noted that if the Office, in its sole discretion, deems the volume
of the papers filed from litigation or other proceedings to be too lengthy, the Office may
return, expunge, or discard, at its sole discretion, all or part of the submission. In such
an instance, a party may limit the submission in accordance with what is deemed relevant,
and resubmit the papers. Such submissions must be provided without additional comment.
Persons making such submissions must
limit the submission to the
notification
and not include further arguments or information. Highlighting of
certain text by underlining, fluorescent marker, etc., goes beyond bare notice of the prior
or concurrent proceedings. Any proper submission will be promptly placed on record
(entered) in the patent file. Entry of these submissions is performed by the Files
Repository personnel, unless a reexamination proceeding is pending, in which case, the
Central Reexamination Unit, the Technology Center, or other area of the Office having
responsibility for the reexamination enters the submission.
It is to be further noted that
35 U.S.C. 290
is directed to “courts of
the United States.” Accordingly, any submission of papers from a court outside the United
States (a foreign jurisdiction) will be returned, expunged or discarded, at the sole
discretion of the Office.
Where a request for reexamination has been filed, see
MPEP §
2282
for
ex parte
reexamination and
MPEP §
2686
for
inter partes
reexamination
further noted that
35 U.S.C. 290
is directed to “courts of
the United States.” Accordingly, any submission of papers from a court outside the United
States (a foreign jurisdiction) will be returned, expunged or discarded, at the sole
discretion of the Office.
Where a request for reexamination has been filed, see
MPEP §
2282
for
ex parte
reexamination and
MPEP §
2686
for
inter partes
reexamination. See
MPEP §
2240
and
§ 2242
for handling of requests for
ex parte
reexamination of patents involved in litigation. See
MPEP §
2640
and
§ 2642
for handling of requests for
inter partes
reexamination of patents involved in litigation.
[top]
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.