Investigations Involving Members of Congress
FederalAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
DOJ Justice Manual › Title 9: Criminal › 9-85.000 - Protection of Government Integrity › Justice Manual § 9-85.110
Text
Consultation with the Public Integrity Section (“PIN”) is required in all investigations involving a Member of Congress or congressional staff member (“Congressional Staffer”).
[1]
As set forth in the table below, such consultation shall occur, and where required, approval shall be obtained, prior to opening any investigation or taking particular investigative steps involving a Member of Congress or Congressional Staffer, including, but not limited to:
interviewing or subpoenaing a Member of Congress or Congressional Staffer (unless the Member of Congress or Congressional Staffer is being interviewed as a victim);
obtaining a subpoena, 2703(d) order, search warrant, or other legal process for records, information, or property belonging to a Member of Congress, Congressional Office, or Congressional Staffer; or
engaging in consensual monitoring of oral communications of a Member of Congress or Congressional Staffer. Consensual monitoring in an investigation involving allegations of misconduct by a Member of Congress also requires approval by a Deputy Assistant Attorney General.
See
JM 9-7.302
.
PIN may also recommend partnership with United States Attorney’s Offices or other prosecuting components on particular matters that implicate PIN’s areas of expertise.
As set forth in the table below, certain charging decisions and resolutions of criminal charges in such investigations require PIN approval. For example, any criminal charge, resolution of a criminal charge, or declination in a matter in which a Member of Congress is an investigative subject or target requires prior approval by PIN. (Note that plea agreements involving defendants who are candidates for Congress also require prior approval by PIN.
See
JM 9-16.110
.) Where consultation or approval is required, no investigative action shall be taken until such consultation has been completed or such approval has been obtained.
er in which a Member of Congress is an investigative subject or target requires prior approval by PIN. (Note that plea agreements involving defendants who are candidates for Congress also require prior approval by PIN.
See
JM 9-16.110
.) Where consultation or approval is required, no investigative action shall be taken until such consultation has been completed or such approval has been obtained.
U.S. Attorney’s Offices should also apply elevated internal review and approval requirements for all investigative steps identified below, with U.S. Attorney approval required where PIN approval is required.
The requirements in this section are in addition, and not an alternative, to other consultation and approval requirements in the Justice Manual. Further, prior to taking an investigative step governed by one of the requirements set forth in this section, the United States Attorney’s Office or other prosecuting component must file an Urgent Report.
See
JM 1-13.130
. The Urgent Report should indicate whether PIN concurred with, or approved of, the planned investigative step.
Investigative Step/Prosecutorial Decision
Consultation or Approval Requirement
[2]
Case Opening, Where a Subject or Target is a Member of Congress, or Congressional Staffer When Related to the Staffer’s Duties
Consultation with PIN
Issuance of Subpoena to a Congressional Office, Member of Congress, or Congressional Staffer
Consultation with PIN
Issuance of Subpoena to Third Party for Records Belonging to a Congressional Office, Member of Congress, or Congressional Staffer When Related to the Staffer’s Duties
Approval by PIN
Issuance of Subpoena to Third Party for Records Belonging to Congressional Staffer When Unrelated to the Staffer’s Duties
Consultation with PIN
Applications, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 2703(d) or 2705(b),
[3]
for Records Belonging to a Congressional Office Member of Congress, or Congressional Staffer When Related to the Staffer’s Duties
Approval by PIN
Applications, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C
roval by PIN
Issuance of Subpoena to Third Party for Records Belonging to Congressional Staffer When Unrelated to the Staffer’s Duties
Consultation with PIN
Applications, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 2703(d) or 2705(b),
[3]
for Records Belonging to a Congressional Office Member of Congress, or Congressional Staffer When Related to the Staffer’s Duties
Approval by PIN
Applications, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 2703(d) or 2705(b), for Records Belonging to Congressional Staffer When Unrelated to the Staffer’s Duties
Consultation with PIN
Application for Pen Register or Trap & Trace Surveillance of Devices or Accounts Belonging to a Congressional Office Member of Congress, or Congressional Staffer When Related to the Staffer’s Duties
Approval by PIN
Application for Pen Register or Trap & Trace Surveillance of Devices or Accounts Belonging to a Congressional Staffer When Unrelated to the Staffer’s Duties
Consultation with PIN
Interview of Member of Congress or Congressional Staffer, Except When Member of Congress or Congressional Staffer Is a Victim
Consultation with PIN
Government-Directed Contact, by a Source or Government Cooperator, with Member of Congress or Congressional Staffer
Approval by PIN
Application for Warrant for Records, Information, or Property Belonging to a Congressional Office, Member of Congress, or Congressional Staffer, or for a Location or Device in Which Legislative Materials Are Likely To Be Found
[4]
Approval by PIN
Application for Title III Electronic Surveillance if Member of Congress’s or Congressional Staffer’s Communications May Be Intercepted
Approval by PIN
[5]
Consensual Electronic Monitoring of Oral Communications of Member of Congress or Congressional Staffer
Approval by PIN
Charging (Whether by Criminal Complaint, Information, or Indictment) in Matter in Which a Member of Congress Is a Subject or Target for Conduct Related to Public Office or Campaign Activities
Approval by PIN
Charging (Whether by Criminal Complaint, Information, or Indictment) in Matter in Which a Member of Congress Is
l Communications of Member of Congress or Congressional Staffer
Approval by PIN
Charging (Whether by Criminal Complaint, Information, or Indictment) in Matter in Which a Member of Congress Is a Subject or Target for Conduct Related to Public Office or Campaign Activities
Approval by PIN
Charging (Whether by Criminal Complaint, Information, or Indictment) in Matter in Which a Member of Congress Is a Subject or Target for Conduct Unrelated to Public Office or Campaign Activities
Consultation with PIN
Resolution of Criminal Charges (Guilty Plea, DPA, NPA, or Declination) in Matter in Which a Member of Congress Is a Subject or Target
Approval by PIN
Resolution of Criminal Charges Against a Congressional Staffer (Guilty Plea, DPA, NPA, or Declination) in Matter in Which a Member of Congress Is Not a Subject or Target
Consultation with PIN
[1]
In investigations in which Members of Congress or their offices or staff are crime victims—such as in a threats case, or when money or property is stolen from a Congressional office—prosecutors are generally encouraged but not required to consult with PIN. However, if investigative or prosecutorial steps that are otherwise addressed in this section become necessary in such a case, then the PIN consultation and approval requirements set forth in the chart below would apply. For example, if the investigation into a crime committed against a Member of Congress were to require a subpoena for records belonging to a Congressional office, then PIN consultation would be required.
[2]
PIN must notify the Criminal Division’s Assistant Attorney General of consultations and approvals undertaken.
[3]
If a § 2705(b) order would delay notice to a Member of Congress, Congressional Office, or a Congressional Staffer, as defined in
JM 9-85.110
, the prosecutor must disclose such information in the application to the Court.
JM 9-13.700(2)
ce, then PIN consultation would be required.
[2]
PIN must notify the Criminal Division’s Assistant Attorney General of consultations and approvals undertaken.
[3]
If a § 2705(b) order would delay notice to a Member of Congress, Congressional Office, or a Congressional Staffer, as defined in
JM 9-85.110
, the prosecutor must disclose such information in the application to the Court.
JM 9-13.700(2)
.
[4]
This approval requirement also applies to warrants for GPS or other location data and tracking devices for vehicles or other property, devices, or accounts belonging to a Member of Congress, Congressional Staffer, Congressional Office, or in which legislative materials are likely to be found.
[5]
Additional approvals from the Office of Enforcement Operations, a Criminal Division Deputy Assistant Attorney General, and/or an Assistant Attorney General are required for TIIIs, as well as consensual monitoring in certain circumstances.
See
JM 9-7.000
et seq.
[updated September 2024]
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.