Personal Injury Protection (PIP)

DelawareAgency guidance

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

Delaware Department of Insurance Bulletins › Personal Injury Protection (PIP)

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

AUTO BULLETIN NO. 10

PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION (“PIP”)

Original No._____

Adopted December 5, 1994

Amended June 12, 1995

Amended October 15, 1998

Legal reference:

Title 21 Delaware Code, Section 2118(a)(2)

Title 18 Delaware Code, Section 2304(16)

It has come to the attention of the Insurance Commissioner that a number of automobile insurers are refusing

to pay Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) benefits in the amount charged by health care providers as a result of a

determination that the amount charged is not “reasonable” as required by statute.

Under the applicable law, 21 Delaware Code, Section 2118(a)(2), insurers are responsible for paying the

“reasonable and necessary expenses” for PIP coverage. Some insurers are refusing to pay more than a portion of the

medical, hospital, or other professional medical expenses on behalf of their insureds based upon what those carriers

believe are “unreasonable” fees billed.

In interpreting the relevant statute, it is the Commissioner’s opinion that PIP carriers must pay all of an

insured’s PIP costs (less any applicable deductible) if those costs are reasonable and pertain to services that are

necessarily required for the care of the insured. This does not apply when a provider of services and carrier have

previously agreed on a price for a specified service.

If a medical provider has charged in “unreasonable fee” for a necessary treatment, the unreasonableness of

that fee does not render the treatment “unnecessary.” That portion of the fee which is not in dispute shall be paid

according to relevant law. A dispute over the remaining amount of such a fee should remain a dispute between the

carrier and the provider. It is expected that carriers will make good faith efforts to resolve such disputes and not expose

the insured party to harassment or legal action

fee does not render the treatment “unnecessary.” That portion of the fee which is not in dispute shall be paid

according to relevant law. A dispute over the remaining amount of such a fee should remain a dispute between the

carrier and the provider. It is expected that carriers will make good faith efforts to resolve such disputes and not expose

the insured party to harassment or legal action. However, if a claim is made or legal action is filed by the provider

against the insured party for the amount of the fee in dispute, the carrier must provide a defense for its insured against

that claim or legal action.

Under the Delaware Unfair Practice Act, Title 18 Delaware Code, Section 2304(16), it is an unfair trade

practice to attempt with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice to settle a claim for less than the

insurance policy requires. The Department will vigorously enforce the rights of insured to receive the benefits to which

they are contractually entitled. It will be considered a violation of 18 Delaware Code, Section 2304 if a carrier asserts

that the provisions of this bulletin prohibit balance billing.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.