2004 Notice of Court Decision Invalidating SB 841 —(Auto/Persistency) March 5, 2004
CaliforniaAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
California DOI Insurance Notices › 2004 Notice of Court Decision Invalidating SB 841 —(Auto/Persistency) March 5, 2004
Text
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
45 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
NOTICE
TO:
ALL ADMITTED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURERS LICENSED TO
WRITE PRIVATE PASSENGER AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE, AND OTHER
INTERESTED PERSONS
SUBJECT:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DECISION INVALIDATING
SB 841 (PERATA) (CHAPTER 169, STATUTES OF 2003)
DATE:
MARCH 5, 2004
The purpose of this Notice is to inform affected licensees and interested members of the public
of a recent decision of the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles declaring invalid recent
amendments to California Insurance Code Section 1861.02(c).
SB 841 (Chapter 169, Statutes of 2003), signed by the Governor on August 2, 2003, redefined
the optional automobile rating factor “persistency”. SB 841 was subsequently challenged in The
Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, et al. v. Garamendi, Los Angeles Superior
Court Case No. BS086235.
On January 15, 2004, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Dzintra Janavs issued an oral ruling,
which declared SB 841 an invalid amendment to the provisions of Proposition 103. Judge
Janavs granted a Peremptory Writ of Mandate, ordering the Commissioner not to attempt to
enforce the provisions of SB 841. Judge Janavs signed the Judgment and Peremptory Writ of
Mandate on February 20, 2004.
The Department has been informed that Judge Janavs’ decision will be appealed. Questions
have been posed by insurers and others regarding the regulation of class plans during the time the
case is on appeal. Some insurers are concerned about the possibility of being required to change
their class plans now and again after the case is finally resolved
ptory Writ of
Mandate on February 20, 2004.
The Department has been informed that Judge Janavs’ decision will be appealed. Questions
have been posed by insurers and others regarding the regulation of class plans during the time the
case is on appeal. Some insurers are concerned about the possibility of being required to change
their class plans now and again after the case is finally resolved. In order to minimize any
disruption to insurers and their policyholders, to maintain the status quo pending the outcome of
an appeal, and in accordance with the provisions of the Judgment and Writ of Mandate signed by
Judge Janavs, the Commissioner provides the following guidance as to the actions he intends to
take, in the sound exercise of his discretion, during the pendency of any appeal:
1. The Commissioner does not intend at this time to order any insurer that submitted a class
plan in accordance with the provisions of SB 841, which plan was submitted after the
effective date of SB 841 and was approved prior to the date the Judgment and Writ of
Mandate was signed by the Court, to take any action to comply with the statute as it read
before enactment of SB 841. However, any such insurer may submit to the Department for
approval any changes to its class plan that do not rely on SB 841.
2. In accordance with the judgment, the Department will not approve, or allow to be deemed
approved, any application to establish a class plan incorporating the persistency definition set
forth in SB 841.
At the conclusion of this litigation, the Commissioner expects all affected insurers to be in a
position promptly to file class plan applications that are in full compliance with the provisions of
the court’s ruling.
Questions regarding this bulletin should be directed to:
Rick Holbrook
Chief, Rate Filing Bureau
California Department of Insurance
45 Fremont Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
lusion of this litigation, the Commissioner expects all affected insurers to be in a
position promptly to file class plan applications that are in full compliance with the provisions of
the court’s ruling.
Questions regarding this bulletin should be directed to:
Rick Holbrook
Chief, Rate Filing Bureau
California Department of Insurance
45 Fremont Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 538-4328
Dated: March 5, 2004
JOHN GARAMENDI
Insurance Commissioner
2
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.