AZ Circular Letter 1990-07A: "Moving" Auto Insurance Policyholders to New Companies
ArizonaAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Arizona Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions Bulletins › AZ Circular Letter 1990-07A: "Moving" Auto Insurance Policyholders to New Companies
Text
STATE OF ARIZONA
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
JANE DEE HULL
2910 NORTH 44th STREET, SUITE 210
CHARLES R. COHEN
Governor
PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85018-7256
Director of Insurance
602/912-8456 (phone) 602/912-8452 (fax)
Former Director Susan Gallinger issued the following Circular Letter on October 25, 1990:
CIRCULAR LETTER NO. 90-7A
TO:
ALL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURERS; INSURANCE TRADE
ASSOCIATIONS, AGENTS’ ASSOCIATIONS AND OTHER INTERESTED
PARTIES
FROM:
SUSAN GALLINGER, DIRECTOR OF INSURANCE
DATE:
OCTOBER 25, 1990
RE:
“MOVING”
AUTO
INSURANCE
POLICYHOLDERS
TO
NEW
COMPANIES
Recently, the Department of Insurance has received information indicating
that some insurers are encouraging their agents to engage in conduct that may violate
Arizona law. Since the Insurance Department assumes that such insurers would not
knowingly
engage
in
such
conduct,
the
following
summary
of
Arizona’s
noncancellation/nonrenewal, the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act and the Unfair
Practices and Frauds Act is provided.
A.R.S. § 20-1631(B) prohibits insurers from cancelling or nonrenewing
personal auto insurance policies* which have been in effect for more than 60 days
except for a very limited number of reasons specified in the statute. As noted above,
some insurers have encouraged their agents to “move” auto insurance policyholders to
other insurers because the (original) insurer wishes to stop underwriting auto insurance
and/or to withdraw from the auto insurance market in Arizona. In some cases, the
insurer has told the agent that his/her commissions will be reduced below the current
level on any auto policy not “moved” to a new insurer. In other cases insurers have
offered to pay agents to “move” auto policyholder to new insurers
nsurers because the (original) insurer wishes to stop underwriting auto insurance
and/or to withdraw from the auto insurance market in Arizona. In some cases, the
insurer has told the agent that his/her commissions will be reduced below the current
level on any auto policy not “moved” to a new insurer. In other cases insurers have
offered to pay agents to “move” auto policyholder to new insurers.
If the agent in the above referenced circumstances has not explained to
the insured that 1) the insured may be cancelled for any (or no) reason by the “new”
insurer for a period of 60 days AND 2) the policyholder is being asked to “move” to a
______________________________________________________________________
* All references to auto insurance in this Circular mean personal lines auto insurance
only.
Circular Letter 90-7A
October 25, 1990
Page 2
new company because of the agent’s commission or other compensation, the agent
(and thus the insurer as principal of the agent) will have omitted to the state material
facts. Such omissions are prohibited by the provisions of A.R.S. §§ 20-443(1) and 20-
443(5) which proscribe misrepresentation of “the terms of any policy issued or to be
issued or the benefits or advantages promised” and any “misrepresentation to any
policyholder for the purpose of inducing or tending to induce such policyholder to …
surrender … or convert any insurance policy”. In addition, the Unfair Claims Settlement
Practices Act (A.R.S. § 20-461) specifically prohibits such conduct.
The above described conduct is also addressed by the Unfair Practices
and Frauds Act (A.R.S. §§ 20-441 et seq.). A.R.S. § 20-442 prohibits any person from
engaging in any unfair method of competition or unfair or deceptive act or practice in the
business of insurance. By enacting the Unfair Practices and Frauds Act, Arizona has
assumed the authority which existed under the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTCA)
to prohibit unfair or deceptive acts or practices by insurers. A.R.S
t (A.R.S. §§ 20-441 et seq.). A.R.S. § 20-442 prohibits any person from
engaging in any unfair method of competition or unfair or deceptive act or practice in the
business of insurance. By enacting the Unfair Practices and Frauds Act, Arizona has
assumed the authority which existed under the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTCA)
to prohibit unfair or deceptive acts or practices by insurers. A.R.S. § 20-442 was
adopted from Section 5 of the FTCA and is intended to protect consumers from unfair
practices by establishing a standard of fairness. An insurer’s inducing its agents to
have insureds purchase new auto insurance policies when such purchases may not be
in the insured’s best interest constitutes an unfair and deceptive practice under A.R.S. §
20-442.
The Insurance Department will vigorously enforce the above referenced
statutes in order to protect consumers from any and all unfair practices and other
violations. Questions about Arizona’s noncancellation/nonrenewal law, the Unfair
Claims Practices Act or Unfair Practices and Frauds Act, and/or whether its nonrenewal
activities constitute violations should be addressed to Assistant Director, Mary
Butterfield, 2910 N. 44th Street, Suite 210, Phoenix, Arizona 85018.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.