Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
3,317 results
0.07s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hamed Kian, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 13, 2026
New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970) .................................... 10, 15 Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 (1978)....................... 5, 19, 20, 24 Blakely v. … Williams, 399 U.S. at 93-96.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Johnson v. New York State Education Department
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972
Williams, supra, 399 U.S. at 244. … Williams, supra, 399 U.S. at 260 (con- opinion ). ® See pp. 19-24, supra. 52 ing of foreign languages.
409 U.S. 75Amicus Curiae Brief — South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Ss diduittiteclisitabhadie 24 E. … Id. at 43 n.24 (emphasis added).
520 U.S. 1263Amicus Curiae Brief — Blanton v. North Las Vegas
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
New York, 399 U.S. 66, 72 (197) 776 24 282, 295 (Nev. 1987) 7 9. F. COMET . . . 5. Ohio 1976) i 157 1 Bronson v. Swinney, 648 F.Supp. 1094 (D.Nev. 1986) Bruce v. … New York, 399 U.S. 66, 69.
489 U.S. 538Amicus Curiae Brief — Johnson v. New York State Education Department
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972
California, 372 U.S. 353 .... 9, 10, 11, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 33, 34 Draper v. State of Washington, 372 U.S. 487 ......... 24 Eskridge v. … Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 241.
409 U.S. 75Amicus Curiae Brief — Cain v. Rideau
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
California, 386 U.S. 18, 21-24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 826-828, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) ........... 9 Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, 90 S.Ct. 1999, Se Ee ee ENN aicisnsnldn eos eens 9 Davis v. … Georgia, 429 U.S. 122, 97 S.Ct. 399, 50 L.Ed.2d 399 (1976); Vasquez, 474 U.S. at 263.
533 U.S. 924Amicus Curiae Brief — Dutton v. Evans
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1970
Rev. 932 iiedtennan nae 24 Handbook of the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (1969) - - - ---------------- 26 Henkin, “Selective Incorporation” in the Fourteenth Amendment … This Court noted prob- able jurisdiction on February 24, 1969, 393 U.S. 1076.
400 U.S. 74Amicus Curiae Brief — Hamed Kian, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 13, 2026
Rev. 621 (1998) ...... 24, 25, 27 Michael J. Saks & Mollie Weighner Marti, A MetaAnalysis of the Effects of Jury Size, 21 Law & Hum. … And it includes—as Williams itself acknowledged—panels “fixed generally at 12.” 399 U.S. at 89.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Beard v. Banks
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Beard, 399 F.3d 134 (3d Cir. 2005) ..... passim Bd. of Educ. v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853 (1982) ........ 24 Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979) ...... 7, 10,21, 24 Block v. … See Banks, 399 F.3d at 139 1.5 & 1440.15. 24 This argument is a red herring. First, under the Turner analysis, “the right in question must be viewed reasonably and expansively.”
548 U.S. 521Amicus Curiae Brief — Hamed Kian, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 13, 2026
P. 24 .................................................... 17 v Historical Materials Bacon, A New Abridgment of the Law (4th ed. 1778).......................................................... 5 Bishop … Br. 24-27—to restore the jury to its full constitutional vigor. III. Overruling Williams would not have undue consequences.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Lewis v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
Hardy, 478 U.S. 255 (1986) ........... 24 Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. RT a ar a a 2, 3, 5, 6, 18, 19 Bell v. United States, 349 U.S. 81 Sse he ete oS ee 7 Blanton v. … Baldwin, 399 U.S. at 69.
518 U.S. 322Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 10, 2025
P. 24 .................................................... 20 Sup. Ct. … P. 24 advisory committee’s notes to 1999 amendments.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 21, 2026
Read, No. 24-1783 (D. Or. 2024). … Read, No. 24-1783 (D.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 24, 2025
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2, 7, 11 Loving v. … Callais, Nos. 24-109, 24-110 (U.S. Jan. 21, 2025) . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Brief for Appellee Louisiana Secretary of State, Louisiana v. Callais, Nos. 24-109, 24-110 (U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Mark Todd Minor, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 25, 2025
No. 24-7489 In the Supreme Court of the United States MARK TODD MINOR, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA, Respondent. … Florida, No. 24-7489, on the question of whether the Sixth Amendment permits criminal juries smaller than twelve. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT In Williams v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Beard v. Banks
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Banks, 399 F.3d at 138. 24 would “create an incentive to comply with prison rules and thereby be removed to Level | and eventually to the general population.” Banks, 399 F.3d at 138. … Brief 24-25.
548 U.S. 521Amicus Curiae Brief — Hamed Kian, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 13, 2026
Harris, 1 Binn. 416 (Pa. 1808) .................................... 24 Foote v. Lawrence, 1 Stew. 483 (Ala. 1828)................................... 24 Gibbons v. … See 399 U.S. at 88–90 & nn.22–23.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Clarke, 479 U.S. at 399-400 (citing Invest- ment Co. Institute v. Camp, 401 U.S. 617 (1971)). … See Clarke, 479 U.S. at 399 (quoting Block, 467 U.S. at 347).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hamed Kian, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 13, 2026
Rep. 17, 17-18; Yel. 24, 24 (“eleven of the jury appear’d and were sworn; but one was challeng’d by the prisoners, and so for that time the trial was stay’d”). 3. … Williams, 399 U.S. at 94 (quoting 1 Annals of Cong. 435 (1789)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Idaho v. Wright
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 155 (1970). … Green, 399 U.S. at 158.
497 U.S. 805
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.