Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters1987

10,000+ results

0.28s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Georgia v. McCollum

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

    Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970)............. 24 United States Constitution cick pede cccnuereesescvsensees 4, passim PED SUMED svc ncncsncccecscesecoseus 3, passim New York State Statutes Pe es Gs I, … Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970) (upholding notice-of-alibi statute).

    505 U.S. 42
  • Petitioners Brief — Toibb v. Radloff

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1991

    See ee ea 23, 24, 27 (lL eee ete er as 24 i 8 ee eae 26 IL = 12 8 es —_ > UL) 4)” iia ee 22 BE UBC. § 2BBB ...........-2200----0-c0-nene-crenseeenscreonenreees 22 vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued … App. 24.

    501 U.S. 157
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Cigna Healthcare of Texas, Inc., Dba Cigna Corp. v. Calad

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

    Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399 (1988), an LMRA preemption case. … Livadas, 525 U.S. at 123-24 (internal citation omitted)."”

    540 U.S. 981
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Stoneridge Inv. Partners v. Scientific-Atl.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

    Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218 (2001)................ 24 Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. Sandberg, 501 U.S. … . §§ 1801] et 80g. .......c.sccccceseseesssceseseers 24 Civil Rights Act of 1964, tit.

    552 U.S. 148
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

    EPA, 66 F.3d 2S RT a 24-26 Chemical Mfrs. Ass’n v. EPA, 870 F.2d 177 I a csctieealabvionscenl 5, 27 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. NRDC, 470 U.S. 116 REE, SESS ent oe 23, 24 City of Chicago v. … EPA Br. 24.

    556 U.S. 208
  • Opposition Brief — Simmons v. Galvin

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2010

    Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24, 55 (1974)). … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 426 (2006) (“The general terms of the statutory standard ‘totality of circumstances’ require judicial interpretation.”).

    562 U.S. 980
  • Brief for the United State in Opposition — Glasser v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United State in Opposition · 1942

    United States, 24 F. (2d) 353, certiorari denied, ok eee nf eee Desay Moffatt vy. United States, 232 Fed. 522. setae Pies Morrison v. … This attorney objected on several occasions to Government testimony (R. 194-195, 399, 545, 624, 679-680, 703), and examined various witnesses on behalf of Glasser (R. 823-829, 831, 910, 1028).

    315 U.S. 60
  • Respondents Briefm — Lubin v. Panish

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Briefm · 1974

    Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970) 13 Code of Civil Procedures, Section 2015.5 5 Elections Code, Section 6554 40 Section 6555 24, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 Section 18600 Division 10 24, 27 Section 18601 24 … Section 18602 24 Section 18603 24, 25, 30 IN THE Supreme Court of the Gnited States October Term, 1972 No. 71-6852 DONALD PAUL LUBIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated

    415 U.S. 709
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Molina Healthcare of Illinois, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Thomas Prose

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 14, 2022

    Kettering Health Network, 816 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 2016).................................. 15 United States ex rel. Smith v. Wallace, 723 F. … Kettering Health Network, 816 F.3d 399, 411 (6th Cir. 2016)).

  • Respondents Brief — Ashland Specialty Co., Inc., Petitioner v. Dale W. Steager, West Virginia State Tax Commissioner

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · May 15, 2019

    Ely, 468 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 2006) .................................. 24 United States v. Heldeman, 402 F.3d 220 (1st Cir. 2005) ............................ 13, 22 United States v. … Ely, 468 F.3d 399, 403 (6th Cir. 2006)). Seventh Circuit.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ricky Parras Yanez, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 20, 2026

    Duarte, 137 F.4th 743 (9th Cir. 2025) (en banc) ............................... 23–24 United States v. … Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970) .................................................................... 36 Zherka v.

  • Opposition Brief — Sommer v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of America

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002

    The opinion of the District Court denying Petitioner's motion to correct a clerical mistake is reproduced in Petitioner’s Appendix at 9-24. … On March 24, 1999, the Ninth Circuit affirmed judg- ments in Sommer I and Sommer II.

    537 U.S. 948
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Edwards v. Acadia Realty Trust, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002

    {R4-103-31:14-32:6, 53:24- 55:19.) … See Richardson, 521 U.S. at 399.

    537 U.S. 827
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

    Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994) ...........0..0.... 3 Hawkins v. Crist, No. CV-76-99-BLG (D.Mont. Jan- ST We SECA sdncadndedeve Uke eSccvedeic bes 7, 12 Hinshaw v. … In 1887, Congress passed the General Allotment Act. 24 Stat. 388 (1887).

    520 U.S. 1263
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Gill v. Whitford, 138 S. Ct. 52 (2017) (No. 16-1161)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

    Wendelberger, Nos. 01-C-0121, 02-C-0366, 2002 WL 34127471 gS 24 Buckley v. Valeo, eo 5 Burns v. Richardson, a asia i) Cal. Democratic Party v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ............cccccccecseee 14, 15, 17, 21, 23, 24 McCleskey v. Kemp, iets 11 McGowan v. Maryland, ERS eS en RT 6 Miller v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Gill v. Whitford, 138 S. Ct. 52 (2017) (No. 16-1161)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

    Perry, eee rveeveeree 5 548 U.S, 399 (2006) ......0::ccccccerees 7, 8,11, 16, 26, 27 Vv Melntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm'n, 514 U.S. 384 (199B),........00cccceeesceeeseeeenes Miller v. … Reno, ED 24, 25, 27 United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., a 18 Vieth v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — DeFunis v. Odegaard

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974

    Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964) ............ 16 Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 EP Ac ethva nid canbe Wake ceGa Ghee heeKe 15, 16, 17, 27 Contractors Association of Eastern Pa. v. … Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, ee et: Re ert rer 14, 15, 18, 24 Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950)..... 9, 18, 19, 28, 29 Tigner v.

    416 U.S. 312
  • Petition — Colonial Bank of New Orleans v. Vickers

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981

    TUTE). oc evncvcccccecectecideccses In Re Haggerty, 165 F'. 2d 977 (2nd Cir. 1948) ....... 9 Matter of Hammons, 614 F. 2d 399 (5th Cir. 1980) .. 7 oes Pallos State Bank, 401 F. 2d 63 (7th Cir. … As stated in Matter of Hammons, 614 F. 2d 399 (5th Cir. 1980) at page 403: ‘“‘The Bankruptcy Judge’s ‘new and different busi- ness’ determination was a conclusion as to the 8 legal significance of

    454 U.S. 821
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — TENN. SEC. SCHOOL ATHLETIC v. Brentwood Acad.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

    United States, 444 U.S. 507 (1980)..........ccceee 24 Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969) .........ccccccsececeeeeeeees 7 Terminiello v. … at 399. As shown below, the TSSAA cannot sustain the arbitrary manner in which it has interfered with that right. “almost dour to door salesmanship.

    551 U.S. 291
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Whorton v. Bockting

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

    Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) .............. 26 Caspari v. Bohlen, 510 U.S. 383 (1994) .............6. 18 Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 (1986) ............. 25 Crawford v. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 162 (1970)), the rule allowing the admission of dying declarations, id. at 56 n.6 (citing Mattox v.

    549 U.S. 406

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.