Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.28s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Georgia v. McCollum
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970)............. 24 United States Constitution cick pede cccnuereesescvsensees 4, passim PED SUMED svc ncncsncccecscesecoseus 3, passim New York State Statutes Pe es Gs I, … Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970) (upholding notice-of-alibi statute).
505 U.S. 42Petitioners Brief — Toibb v. Radloff
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1991
See ee ea 23, 24, 27 (lL eee ete er as 24 i 8 ee eae 26 IL = 12 8 es —_ > UL) 4)” iia ee 22 BE UBC. § 2BBB ...........-2200----0-c0-nene-crenseeenscreonenreees 22 vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued … App. 24.
501 U.S. 157Amicus Curiae Brief — Cigna Healthcare of Texas, Inc., Dba Cigna Corp. v. Calad
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399 (1988), an LMRA preemption case. … Livadas, 525 U.S. at 123-24 (internal citation omitted)."”
540 U.S. 981Amicus Curiae Brief — Stoneridge Inv. Partners v. Scientific-Atl.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218 (2001)................ 24 Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. Sandberg, 501 U.S. … . §§ 1801] et 80g. .......c.sccccceseseesssceseseers 24 Civil Rights Act of 1964, tit.
552 U.S. 148Amicus Curiae Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
EPA, 66 F.3d 2S RT a 24-26 Chemical Mfrs. Ass’n v. EPA, 870 F.2d 177 I a csctieealabvionscenl 5, 27 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. NRDC, 470 U.S. 116 REE, SESS ent oe 23, 24 City of Chicago v. … EPA Br. 24.
556 U.S. 208Opposition Brief — Simmons v. Galvin
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2010
Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24, 55 (1974)). … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 426 (2006) (“The general terms of the statutory standard ‘totality of circumstances’ require judicial interpretation.”).
562 U.S. 980Brief for the United State in Opposition — Glasser v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United State in Opposition · 1942
United States, 24 F. (2d) 353, certiorari denied, ok eee nf eee Desay Moffatt vy. United States, 232 Fed. 522. setae Pies Morrison v. … This attorney objected on several occasions to Government testimony (R. 194-195, 399, 545, 624, 679-680, 703), and examined various witnesses on behalf of Glasser (R. 823-829, 831, 910, 1028).
315 U.S. 60Respondents Briefm — Lubin v. Panish
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Briefm · 1974
Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970) 13 Code of Civil Procedures, Section 2015.5 5 Elections Code, Section 6554 40 Section 6555 24, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 Section 18600 Division 10 24, 27 Section 18601 24 … Section 18602 24 Section 18603 24, 25, 30 IN THE Supreme Court of the Gnited States October Term, 1972 No. 71-6852 DONALD PAUL LUBIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
415 U.S. 709Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 14, 2022
Kettering Health Network, 816 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 2016).................................. 15 United States ex rel. Smith v. Wallace, 723 F. … Kettering Health Network, 816 F.3d 399, 411 (6th Cir. 2016)).
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · May 15, 2019
Ely, 468 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 2006) .................................. 24 United States v. Heldeman, 402 F.3d 220 (1st Cir. 2005) ............................ 13, 22 United States v. … Ely, 468 F.3d 399, 403 (6th Cir. 2006)). Seventh Circuit.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ricky Parras Yanez, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 20, 2026
Duarte, 137 F.4th 743 (9th Cir. 2025) (en banc) ............................... 23–24 United States v. … Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970) .................................................................... 36 Zherka v.
Opposition Brief — Sommer v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of America
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002
The opinion of the District Court denying Petitioner's motion to correct a clerical mistake is reproduced in Petitioner’s Appendix at 9-24. … On March 24, 1999, the Ninth Circuit affirmed judg- ments in Sommer I and Sommer II.
537 U.S. 948Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Edwards v. Acadia Realty Trust, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002
{R4-103-31:14-32:6, 53:24- 55:19.) … See Richardson, 521 U.S. at 399.
537 U.S. 827Amicus Curiae Brief — South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994) ...........0..0.... 3 Hawkins v. Crist, No. CV-76-99-BLG (D.Mont. Jan- ST We SECA sdncadndedeve Uke eSccvedeic bes 7, 12 Hinshaw v. … In 1887, Congress passed the General Allotment Act. 24 Stat. 388 (1887).
520 U.S. 1263Amicus Curiae Brief — Gill v. Whitford, 138 S. Ct. 52 (2017) (No. 16-1161)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Wendelberger, Nos. 01-C-0121, 02-C-0366, 2002 WL 34127471 gS 24 Buckley v. Valeo, eo 5 Burns v. Richardson, a asia i) Cal. Democratic Party v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ............cccccccecseee 14, 15, 17, 21, 23, 24 McCleskey v. Kemp, iets 11 McGowan v. Maryland, ERS eS en RT 6 Miller v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gill v. Whitford, 138 S. Ct. 52 (2017) (No. 16-1161)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Perry, eee rveeveeree 5 548 U.S, 399 (2006) ......0::ccccccerees 7, 8,11, 16, 26, 27 Vv Melntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm'n, 514 U.S. 384 (199B),........00cccceeesceeeseeeenes Miller v. … Reno, ED 24, 25, 27 United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., a 18 Vieth v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — DeFunis v. Odegaard
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964) ............ 16 Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 EP Ac ethva nid canbe Wake ceGa Ghee heeKe 15, 16, 17, 27 Contractors Association of Eastern Pa. v. … Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, ee et: Re ert rer 14, 15, 18, 24 Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950)..... 9, 18, 19, 28, 29 Tigner v.
416 U.S. 312Petition — Colonial Bank of New Orleans v. Vickers
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
TUTE). oc evncvcccccecectecideccses In Re Haggerty, 165 F'. 2d 977 (2nd Cir. 1948) ....... 9 Matter of Hammons, 614 F. 2d 399 (5th Cir. 1980) .. 7 oes Pallos State Bank, 401 F. 2d 63 (7th Cir. … As stated in Matter of Hammons, 614 F. 2d 399 (5th Cir. 1980) at page 403: ‘“‘The Bankruptcy Judge’s ‘new and different busi- ness’ determination was a conclusion as to the 8 legal significance of
454 U.S. 821Amicus Curiae Brief — TENN. SEC. SCHOOL ATHLETIC v. Brentwood Acad.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
United States, 444 U.S. 507 (1980)..........ccceee 24 Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969) .........ccccccsececeeeeeeees 7 Terminiello v. … at 399. As shown below, the TSSAA cannot sustain the arbitrary manner in which it has interfered with that right. “almost dour to door salesmanship.
551 U.S. 291Amicus Curiae Brief — Whorton v. Bockting
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) .............. 26 Caspari v. Bohlen, 510 U.S. 383 (1994) .............6. 18 Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 (1986) ............. 25 Crawford v. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 162 (1970)), the rule allowing the admission of dying declarations, id. at 56 n.6 (citing Mattox v.
549 U.S. 406
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.