Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.71s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 703 (2014) (No. 14-49)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Oe i ccidahinisiaicounsanssdulopasisensooumebacioce Other Authorities Electric Sales, Revenue, and Average Price, Table 5a Illinois EPA Mercury and Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) Rulemaking (http … tremendous amounts of research and capital into developing effective and economically efficient means of helping their customers — power-generating com- panies — comply with the MATS Rule and other clean-air
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 18, 2025
The exemption is indeed all of those things: Neither the Court nor any commentator has been able to offer any explanation for the exemption grounded in the Sherman Act’s common-law backdrop or its rule … Whatever the case, “[t]he orderly way to temper [the Sherman] Act’s 7 policy of competition is by legislation and not by court decision.” Alston, 594 U.S. at 96 (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Albuquerque v. Browner
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
, 42 U.S.C. § 300j-11(b)(1); the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7601(d)(2); the Surface Mining Control and Recla- mation Act, 30 U.S.C. § 1235(k); and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation … THE CLEAN WATER ACT CLEARLY AND UN- AMBIGUOUSLY PROHIBITS INDIAN TRIBES FROM ADOPTING WATER QUALITY STAN- DARDS WHICH ARE MORE STRINGENT THAN FEDERAL MINIMUM STANDARDS.
522 U.S. 965Amicus Curiae Brief — McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Republicans _ engage in the same types of conduct: [The group “Republicans for Clean Air”] spon- sored ads praising then-Governor George W. … [I]t is impossi- ble to imagine officials of the Bush campaign were in the dark about Republicans for Clean Air.
539 U.S. 938Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 26, 2019
Air Regulatory Grp., 573 U.S. at 326. In so doing, DACA both alters individual rights and imposes obligations on States. … This Court has required notice-and-comment procedures for far less significant administrative acts. In Morton v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Kottschade v. City of Rochester
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
air make the area a sanctuary for people.” … The developer submitted 19 different site plans and numerous applications over a period of years in a futile effort to obtain approval.’
540 U.S. 825Amicus Curiae Brief — Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Reg. 7134 (1991)), and Clean Water Act pretreatment and discharge standards (33 U.S.C. 1317(b) and (c); 40 C.F.R. … See Evansville-Vanderburgh Air- port Authority District y.
504 U.S. 334Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 15, 2019
Each amicus organization is deeply interested in the scope of federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act (CWA or Act) and has participated in litigation or rule-making addressing that issue over many … Bringing groundwater within the scope of the Act’s permitting provisions would therefore “have a significant bearing on whether the Clean Water Act comports with due process.” Hawkes Co., 136 S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Erik Lindsey Hughes, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 29, 2018
Army Corps of Engineers over the “waters of the United States,” a term of art used in the Clean Water Act. … Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc., 474 U.S. 121 (1985), in the case of Clean Water Act jurisdiction.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 23, 2024
Sunstein, Is the Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, 98 MICH. L. REV. 303 (1999) ........................................ 11 Cass R. Sunstein, Nondelegation Canons, 67 U. CHI. L. … Sunstein, Is the Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, 98 MICH. L.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Port of Tacoma, et al., Petitioners v. Puget Soundkeeper Alliance
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 28, 2024
arising under both the Clean Water Act and state law. … a permit are significantly lower than under the Clean Water Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
The Federal Register notice explained that the standard applies to (1) clean-up operations at uncontrolled hazard- ous waste disposal sites that have been identified 4 for clean-up by a governmental … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 96-97 (1983). See also 8S. Bokat & H.
505 U.S. 88Amicus Curiae Brief — South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
THE CLEAN WATER ACT AUTHORIZES STATE PROGRAMS TO ADDRESS NONPOINT SOURCES OF POLLUTION NOT COVERED BY THE NPDES PROGRAM. A. … to improve soil, water, air, wetlands and wildlife management.
539 U.S. 957Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 9, 2022
After a brief period of moderation, the Scottish Parliament enacted the oppressive “Act against Conventicles” in 1670. RPS 1670/7/11. … during a “given” (but unspecified) “period of time.”
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Schumer
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
The audit manual and the commentators emphasize that it is a “condition.”"’ … NW, Suite 1117, Washington, DC 20006-1903 (202) 466-5539 FAX (202) 466-5596 ee es ee ee ee 2-a DEFENSE AND HEALTH CARE INDUSTRIES: RATHER THAN CLEAN UP THEIR ACT, THEY ATTACK THE ACT The major
520 U.S. 939Amicus Curiae Brief — U.S. Army Corp of Eng'rs v. Hawkes Co., 136 S. Ct. 615 (2015) (No. 15-290)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States” Under the Clean Water Act, 79 Fed. … Public Comment Letter, Re: Proposed Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States” Under the Clean Water Act, 79 Fed. Reg. 22,188 (April 21, 2014); Docket No.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
No author begins on a clean slate. As Justice Brennan stated in Harper & Row Publishers v. … Air Pirates, 581 F.2d 751, 757 = Cir. 1978), cert. denied sub nom., O’Neill v.
510 U.S. 569Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 3, 2024
Code Regs. § 4.05(5)(e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17, 25 1972 Clean Water Act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1972 Clean Water Act § 301(b)(1)(C) . . . . . . . . . 15, 16, … SMALL BUSINESSES DEPEND ON CLEAN WAT ER , W H ICH IS S A FEGUA R DED BY NARRATIVE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS INCORPORATED INTO CLEAN WATER ACT PERMITS.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 4, 2024
AIR TASK FORCE (Apr. 2024), https://tinyurl.com/2hppvhhv................. 13 Unleashing America’s Energy and Mineral Potential | Full Committee Oversight Hearing (Feb. 8, 2023), HOUSE COMM. … AIR TASK FORCE 20 (Apr. 2024), https://tinyurl.com/2hppvhhv. 26 Michael B.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gisbrecht v. Barnhart
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
Delaware Valley Citizens Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987) ............ 11 Ramos Colon v. Sec'y of Health and Human Servs., Se PR, BEES wb bcc bcsedsvecéves 9 Venegas v. … Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987) (fee awards under fee-shifting provisions of federal environmenta! statutes).
535 U.S. 789
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.