Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.08s
Rule 4-202.02. Records Classification.
Court rules · Court rule
Records Classification. 4 5 6 To classify court records as public or non-public. 7 8 9 This rule applies to the judicial branch. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 … ; CJA 4-202.02 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399
Reply Brief — Ziegler v. Board of Bar Examiners
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1994
Klein, Essay Grading: Fictions, Facts and Forecasts, 54 THE BAR EXAMINER, August, 1985, at 23- 24, wherein Dr. … Klein, Comparison of Rules for Combining Essay and MBE Scores, 52 THE BAR EXAMINER, Feb., 1983, at 24-25, 28.
511 U.S. 1084Opinion — Trenton v. New Jersey
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1923
March 24, 1852, a supplement to the above mentioned act was passed, by which the company was authorized to take the water re- quired either in whole or in part from the Delaware River. … S. 394, 399, it was held that a legislative grant to a city of the power to regulate rates to be charged to the city and its inhabitants by a gas company might be withdrawn by the State from the city
262 U.S. 182Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief in Opposition · 1961
is printed in 1] Wis. 24° 292, 105 N. We 2d 278. … January 24, 1957, the inion commenced fourteen separate actions in the Civil Court of Milwaukee’ County to collect these fines.
365 U.S. 878Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Gould v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1946
United States, 101 F. 24 477_..... 9 Morris v. United States, 123 F. 24 957__.......... 12 New York Central Railroad vy. United States, 212 U. S. 481. 9 Old Monastery Company v. … liquor covered by the invoice, had paid the invoice (ceiling) price by check to the Dowling Company, and had paid an additional specified amount in cash to Robert Gould personally (R. 208-244, 379-399
328 U.S. 848Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Smith v. General Foundry Machine Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1949
S. 477, 487 (24 USPQ 308, 313]. … S. 399, 410.’
338 U.S. 869Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Todd Michael Vincent, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 9, 2020
Ct. 2319 (June 24, 2019), the appeals court denied the appeal, granting without substantively meritless. a COA, (Appx. … McCrae, 793 F#3d 392, 399 (4th Cir. 2015); Wilson v. Sec'y Pa. Dep't of Corr • 9 782 F.3d 110, 115 (3d Cir. 2015); Jones v. Ryan, 733 F.3d 825, 832 n.3 (9th Cir. 2013); Ochoa Canales v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 27, 2026
Amy Swearer, Subject to the [Complete] Jurisdiction Thereof: Salvaging the Original Meaning of the Citizenship Clause, 24 Tex. Rev. L. & Pol. 135, 178 (2020); Adam B. … Rep. at 399. No one can “be a subject to the King . . . unless at the time of his birth he was under the ligeance and obedience of the King.” Id.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Devin M. Kugler, Petitioner v. Gregg Scott, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 12, 2025
App'x 399, 401, 402 (7th Cir. 2019), directly on point. … Page 7 of 10 4:19-cv-04168-CSB #184 Filed: 08/16/24 Page 8 of 10 Bailey, 766 F.
Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Oct 31, 2022
Supp. 3d 419 (D.D.C. 2018) .................. 24 Rostker v. … United States, 365 U.S. 399, 410 (1961) (consulting “[a] number of ... sources,” including statements of committee chair and staff).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 20, 2021
Br. at 24 (citing Frank v. Walker, 768 F.3d 744, 753 (7th Cir. 2014)); see also United States Amicus Br. in Supp. of Pet’rs at 21–24 (“U.S. Br.”); Ariz. … Br. at 21–24; ARP Br. at 29–30. Petitioners are wrong for three main reasons.
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · Dec 22, 2023
Id. at 2323-24. … See Jurisdictional Statement at 23-24. For example, Moore v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Christopher Collings, Petitioner v. David Vandergriff, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 18, 2024
Collings, 450 S.W.3d 741 (Mo. banc 2014) .................... 5, 8, 9, 14, 16, 17, 24 State v. … Himmelman, 399 S.W.2d 58 (Mo. 1966) ...................................................... 23 State v. Mitchell, 659 S.W.2d 4 (Mo.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Chang Wang, et al., Petitioners v. Terilyn Carter-Garrett, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 13, 2021
the Reporter’s Trial Transcripts, Exhibit C at the following: Pg. 47, linesll-15 Pg. 356, lines 11-15 Pg. 392, lines 3-28 Pg. 653, 8 Pg. 675, 23-28 Pg. 732, 22 Pg. 47, 23-26 Pg. 357, lines 11-13 Pg. 399 … Green, supra, 27 Cal.3d at 24.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 29, 2021
Jefferson, 399 A.2d 861 (D.C. Ct. App. 1979) .................................................14 v TABLE OF AUTHORITIES – Continued Page Garcia v. Village of Tijeras, 108 N.M. 116 (Ct. … J.A. 24-25.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hammon v. Indiana
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
FRANZE ARNOLD & PorRTER LLP Counsel of Record 399 Park Avenue ANGELA D. GIVENS New York, NY 10022 KRISTEN KLICK Wuit: (212) 715-1000 ARNOLD & Porter LLP 555 12th Street, N.W. … FRANZE ARNOLD & PORTER LLP Counsel of Record 399 Park Avenue ANGELA D. Givens New York, NY 10022 KRISTEN KLICK WHITE (212) 715-1000 ARNOLD & Porter LLP 555 12th Street, N.W.
546 U.S. 976Opposition Brief — Ridgeway v. Pfizer, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994
Brookfield Township Trustees, 980 F.2d 399 See SAN POE vcd occdceusantasasvaacatessenaueeel 21 Guthrie v. Evans, 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir. … Brookfield Township Trustees, 980 F.2d 399, 404-05 n.5 (6th Cir. 1992).
513 U.S. 916Opposition Brief — Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Daugaard
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2011
Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 411 (1994); Solem v. Bartlett, 465 U.S. 463, 470 (1984). … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 411-412 (1994); Selem v Bartlett, 465 U.S. 469, 470-471 (1984).
564 U.S. 1019Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Crosetto v. Wisconsin State Bar
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997
State Bar of Wisconsin, 94 F.3d. 399, (7th CW. TVG) ccc cc ccncrcccsvcsccccevescceess 14-15, 17-18 CONSTITUTIONAL, STATUTORY, AND RULE PROVISIONS is fe SS ee rrr reer eee ee 22 U.S. … State Bar of Wisconsin, 94 F.3d. 399 (71h Cir. 1996)—and by seeking equitable relief against them pursuant to Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908).
519 U.S. 1116Motion to Dismiss Appeal — Los Angeles v. Public Util. Comm'n of Cal.
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss Appeal · 1959
Pawhuska Ou Co. (1919) 250 U.S. 394, 399 ; Worcester v. Street Railway Co. (1905) 196 U.S. 539, 548-549. … Pawhuska Ou Co., supra, 250 U.S. 394, 399.
359 U.S. 119
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.