Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Students for Fair Admissions, Inc., Petitioner v. President and Fellows of Harvard College

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 1, 2022

Higher Educ. 399 (2022) .............................................................16 Tiffany N. … Higher Educ. 399 (2022); Ivuoma N.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 10, 2025

Sherbert, 374 U.S. at 399, 402. … See pp. 24-26, supra.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 3, 2025

Perry (LULAC), 548 U.S. 399, 427-29 (2006) (relying on election data from year prior to challenged redistricting). … Br. for Louisiana 24.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Wanda L. Edwards, Petitioner v. South Dakota

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 10, 2025

Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970) .................................................... 6 Chimel v. … Houghton, 526 U.S. at 303 (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 24-25). B.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Steinberg v. Pennsylvania

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1971

Alabama, 399 U. S. 1 (1970) ........ceeeevees 7,8 Commonwealth v. Littlejohn, 433 Pa. 336 (1969) ........... 10 Douglas v. California, 372 U .S. 353 (1963) ............... 10 Griffin v. … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, 90 S. Ct. 1992 (1970) as well as considerations of equal protection and the defendants’ right to counsel neces- sitated the indictments be quashed. 11.

Reply Brief — Onwy Uzoigwe, Petitioner v. Charter Communications, LLC

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jan 29, 2026

Mar. 24, 2028) .........ccccccccccsseeeeceeeeseesseeecceeseceetererenes 19 Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. … district courts would have original jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship, the defendant or defendants may remove the action to federal court...provided that no defendant ‘is a citizen of the 399

Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997: Modifications to the List of Recognized Standards, Recognition List Number: 065

Federal Register · Notice · Feb 19, 2026

and replaced with newer version. 8-399 8-630 ASTM F90-24 Standard Specification for Wrought Cobalt-20Chromium-15Tungsten-10Nickel Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R30605) Withdrawn … version. 11-325 11-430 ASTM F564-24 Standard Specification and Test Methods for Metallic Bone Staples Withdrawn and replaced with newer version. 11-326 11-431 ASTM F384-24 Standard

Response to application from respondent Luxshare, Ltd. — ZF Automotive US, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Luxshare, Ltd.

Supreme Court brief · Response to application from respondent Luxshare, Ltd. · Oct 21, 2021

See New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. at 418; Hannah, 363 U.S. at 422 & See United States v. … See Article 12 (1) (d) Rome I Regulation. 9 24.

OST Technical Corrections

Federal Register · Rule · Jun 12, 2008

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary 14 CFR Parts 201, 204, 205, 211, 212, 213, 217, 241, 243, 291, 298, 325, 330, 331, and 382 49 CFR Parts 1, 7, 10, 24, 26, 31, 37, and 40 [Docket … In Title 14, Chapter II, Parts 200-399, remove text specified in the “Remove” column and add in its place the text in the “Add” column in the sections indicated below:   Section Remove Add

Brief for Petitioner — New Hampshire Fire Insurance v. Scanlon

Supreme Court brief · Brief for Petitioner · 1960

Ss. 344 (1931) Goldman V. meric av Dealers Serv tee, 135 °F. 2d 398 ae . (24 Cir, 1943) : & 2.5 Ae Se Oe eS Oe. 6. 6 66 264 6. … Cpage 399). The ¢ Court st fe Appeals atiirmed, saying : & “Consequently, Ter purposes cor construing the nin statute, we are required to. aspunic that appellants.

Reply Brief — Capital One One Bank (USA), N.A. v. Commissioner of Revenue of Massachusetts (No. 08-1169)

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2009

SYL, Inc., 825 A.2d 399, 415 (Md. 2003) (concluding that intangible holding companies “had no real economic substance as separate business entities” for tax purposes). … Respondent invokes the waiver doctrine (Opp. 24-25) to answer the argument that the economic- nexus approach may have significant and disruptive ramifications for foreign relations.

Reply Brief — South Dakota v. SDDS, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2001

Tennessee-Missouri Bridge Comm'n, 399 US. 279 RS i eke ee ss 8 Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp. v. Feeney, GIS US. BFP 6 kad an eek eee eek aes 9 Saahir v. … SDDS’s remaining argument — that § 3-21-10 is preempted by 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (see Br. in Opp. 22-24) — is frivolous.

Opposition Brief — Energy Cooperative, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 108 S. Ct. 294 (1987) (No. 87-0479)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987

Columbia Gas & Electric Corp., 186 F.2d 464, cert. denied, 341 U.S. 921 (1951) ........ 6 Bankruptcy Court Rules ee 10 Treatises Restatement (Second) of Judgments (1982) § 24.... 4,6 No. 87-479 … Moitie, 452 U.S. 394, 398- 399 (1981): Nor are the res judicata consequences of a final unappealed judgment on the merits altered by the fact that the judgment may have been wrong or rested on a legal

Opposition — Brown v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978

National was the second largest producer of gypsum board, with a 24 percent share of the market between 1960 and 1974 (App. S0ex). ’ 2. … Wurzbach, 280 U.S. 396, 399. See also United States v. Powell, 423 U.S. 87, 93. Petitioners knowingly came close to. and indeed overstepped. the line separating the legal from the illegal.

Appendix — De Filippo v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1975

PA. 19107 (215) 561-4050 Petitioners’ Supplemental Brief under Rule 24(5) Petitioners fiie this supplemental Brief, under Rule 24(5), to call the Court’s attention to an unreported deci- sion of the … Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 399 F.2d 902, 905 (9th Cir. 1968). I. SHERMAN ACT CLAIM.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Slack v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973

Ragsdale, 470 F.2d 24 (Sth Cir., Nov. 10, 1972, 12 Criminal Law Reporter 2218) ...... … Cir. 1968) 399 F.2d 559.) We do not think that the photographic display was impermissibly suggestive or that the in-court identifica- tions were tainted.

Brief for the United States — Lemonakis v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1974

App. 26a-27a, n. 24). It was hardly comparable to the hearsay deemed admissi- ble in Chambers v. … California, 386 U.S. 18, 24; Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 230- 7 See Pet. App. 26a, n. 24. 14 232; Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250. It there- fore found the error harmless.

Reply Brief — David D'Addario, et al., Petitioners v. Virginia A. D'Addario

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 22, 2019

Co., 576 F.3d 392, 399 (7th Cir. 2009); Dahlgren v. First Nat. Bank of Holdrege, 533 F.3d 681, 690 (8th Cir. 2008). … Br. at 24). That holding is directly contrary to the binding precedent of this Court set forth in Reves v. Ernst & Young, as well as the holdings of the Third, Seventh, and Eighth Circuits.

Brief for the United States — Gendelman v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1952

pany, a retail store, until April, 1943 (R. 397-399) ) when it was sold to Standard Furniture Company. -, Its operations were reflected on the books of Mod- - ern Furniture and Upholstering Company, … (R. 70-71, 487-438, Ex. 24.)

Opposition Brief — Ralph Kevin Tovar, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 7, 2026

Ct. 2791 (2025) (No. 24-735) (Internet communications in interstate 8 commerce); Koech v. United States, 142 S. … Gjurashaj, 706 F.2d 395, 399 (2d Cir. 1983); United States v. Wesley, 417 F.3d 612, 617 (6th Cir. 2005); United States v.