Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.23s
Petition — Pacelli v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976
(Argued June 24, 1975 Decided July 24, 1975.) Docket No. 75-1149 Untrep Srates or AMERICA, Appellee, ——against— Vincent Pace, JR., Defendant-A ppellant. … Haggett, supra, 438 F.2d at 399-400 ...." United States v. Black- wood, supra, 456 F.2d at 530.
424 U.S. 911Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1972
County Commissioners of Muskogee Coun- ty, 248 U.S. 399 EI ccucncoeecasanaeadie- 12 Gillespie v. Oklahoma, 257 U:S. 501 (1922) ........ 13. Gromer ‘v. … County of Los Angeles, 207 Cal.App.2d 119, 24 Cal. Rptr. 316 CID sctsecinsvxsonssshepininecenncnpieaeinaniicutipelideints a Matthews v.
405 U.S. 933Jurisdictional Statement — Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1986
RO NOW 1, 8, 16, 23, 24 aT USC. weeties GOR) nonce 1-2, 8-9, 16, 23, 24 Ohio Revised Code section 4903.13, para. 1 _.................. 9,25 Other Authorities 18 C. WricHT, A. MILLER AND E. … Newark, 92 Ohio St. 393, 399, 111 N.E. 150, 151 (1915), aff’d, 242 U.S. 405 (1917). See also East Ohio Gas Co. v. Cleveland, 106 Ohio St. 489, 140 N.E. 416 (1922).
476 U.S. 1166Petitioners Brief — Southern Minerals Corp. v. Simmons
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1940
The controlling terms of the assignment to Sim- mons and Webb (R. 399, 464) are these: “Whereas, First Party is the owner of the oil rights under an oil and gas lease from Dr. T. M. … 27, except the East 20 acres of each of said Lots 23, 24 and 27 * * *, all of Lot 20, and all of Lot 13 less 10 acres * * *.
311 U.S. 688Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Robert Joe Long, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 20, 2019
On April 24, 2019, the Florida Supreme Court issued an order in Owen v. … Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002) on June 24, 2002. Mr.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 16, 2017
Indus., 399 F.3d 89, 99 (1st Cir. 2005); CSX Transp., Inc. v. … Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Charles G. Moore, et ux., Petitioners v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 23, 2023
Howbert, 231 U.S. 399 (1913) .................................. 11, 12, 20 United States v. Frost, 25 F. Cas. 1221 (N.D. Ill. 1869) ................. 5 Constitutional Provisions U.S. Const. amends. … Howbert, 231 U.S. 399, 414 (1913). Treasury decisions applying this law concluded that unrealized gains, specifically appreciations in the value of property, qualified as taxable income.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 1, 2022
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923). In the oldest of the cases cited above, Meyer v. … Id. at 399. In Troxel v.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 11, 2021
Brief LEXIS 1254 (2015) .................. 17 , 576 U.S. 351 (2015)...................................... i, 17, 21 , 282 U.S. 399 (1931) ........................................... 35 , 574 U.S. 1104 … from non-warranty assumptions. 31 35 divert it to other uses it decides would be more productive, provide a political advantage to the current administration, or benefit society as a whole. , 282 U.S. 399
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Feb 19, 2026
Guerrero, No. 24-70002, 2025 WL 2051145 (5th Cir. … (citing Titlow, 571 U.S. at 23–24).
Reply Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 27, 2024
Grey, No. 24-cv-1611 (S.D. Cal.). The Board pretends this isn’t happening. … Nor did it matter in Sherbert that the unemployment benefits claimant was “willing[ ] to accept employment” elsewhere. 374 U.S. at 399 n.2.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Selvage v. Collins
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
S. 399, 91 L. Ed. 2d 335, ee eee 15, 27 Francis v. Henderson, 425 U. S. 536, 48 L. Ed. 2d 149, ee, cae b awed e's c's ee 6 Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U. S. 314, 93 L. … S. 399 (1986); persons under 16, at least without a legislatively-set minimum age, Thompson v. Oklahoma, 108 S. Ct. 2687, 101 L.
494 U.S. 108Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Kimm v. Hoy
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1959
The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on June 24, 1959. The jurisdiction of this - Court! is invoked under 28 USS. C.1 1254(1). … Board of Education, 357 U.S S. 399; Nelson v. Los Angeles, No, 152, Oct. Term, 1959, decided Feb. 29, 1960.
361 U.S. 807Opposition Brief — Wilson v. Voting Rights Coalition
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996
TR, 1996) occ cccsaccvccevcvccsscuness 11, 18 Ex Parte Clark, 100 U.S. (10 Otto) 399 (1879)........ 12 EEOC v. Wyoming, 460 U.S. 226 (1983) ............. 25 Garcia v. San Antonio Met. … Id., amd. slip op. at 24. Peti- tioners in this case likewise disregard any savings that will derive from implementation of the NVRA.
516 U.S. 1093Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1968
Superior Court, 97 Ariz. 293, 399 P.2d 907, the © « lower court had granted a change of custody for a minor child. … Thereafter, this application for a writ of man- ~ damus was filed.” 97 Ariz. at 294, 399 P.2d at 908.
390 U.S. 988Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Julius J. Larry, III, Appellant v. Arkansas, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · Nov 5, 2018
Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 433 (2006). … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 445 (2006)).
Respondents Brief — Susan K. Musta, Petitioner v. Mendota Heights Dental Center, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jan 14, 2022
United States, 567 U.S. 387, 399 (2012). … See Pet. at 24 (arguing that state courts are crafting interpretations of state medical marijuana laws “in order to avoid federal preemption concerns”).
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Sparber v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1965
Co. 1953—Eder, J.) ........... 21, 24, 25, 26 Hyde v. United States, 225 U.S. 347 ............... 28 ii PAGE Manley v. … Proc. §399 (cor- roboration of accomplice testimony), and §428 (discharge of jury upon disagreement). The corroboration provision is not of direct concern in this petition for certiorari.
381 U.S. 951Brief for Appellee — Crist v. Bretz
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Appellee · 1978
Ed. 24 653, 84S. Ct. 1489 (1964). … In the New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. note 78 at page 481, 392, 26 L.Ed.2d 691, 90 S.
437 U.S. 28Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2004
The unpublished opinion of the Massachusetts Superior court denying the motion for new trial is reproduced in the Appendix at App. 23-24. … Hall, 303 F.3d 24, 35 (1" cir. 2002) (internal quotations and citation omitted).
542 U.S. 933
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.