Documents

Opposition Brief — School District No. 1 v. Keyes

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

Supp. 399, 402 (D. Colo. 1982). 5 declared that the system was already unitary, and moved for dismissal of the case and dissolution of the injunction. … Pasadena Board of Educ., 611 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1979). 24 presented on the facts and findings in this case, concurred in by both courts below. 2.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ramiro Felix Gonzales, Petitioner v. Texas

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 12, 2023

Reductions in Risk Based on Time Offense-Free in the Community: Once a Sexual Offender, Not Always a Sexual Offender, 24 PSYCH., PUB. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986); Panetti v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Food and Drug Administration, Petitioner v. Wages and White Lion Investments, L.L.C., dba Triton Distribution, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 15, 2024

FDA, 399 F. Supp.3d 479, 487 (D. … Rev. 56:4 1175, 1179 (Fall 1989). 23 McGahn at 24:14 - 24:22. 22 countenanced its ad hoc review process. FDA implicitly argues for a continued adherence of Chenery II without directly saying so.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hamdi Mohamud, Petitioner v. Heather Weyker

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 9, 2021

Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970) ................................................ 23 Ziglar v. Abbasi, 137 S. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 145 (1970) (Stewart, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Total Quality Logistics, LLC, Petitioner v. Robert Cox, as Personal Representative and Special Administrator of the Estate of Greta Cox

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 5, 2025

. § 1.87 ..................................................................... 9 49 C.F.R. part 40 ................................................................ 11 49 C.F.R. parts 300–399 .......... … The Federal Motor 10 Carrier Safety Regulations (“FMCSR”) span over 700 pages in the Code of Federal Regulations. 49 C.F.R. parts 300–399.

Amicus Brief — Doe v. Delaware

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981

Goguen, 415 U.S. 566 (1974) occ ccceeeeceeeeee 24 PAGE Smith v. … at 24.

Record and brief — Missouri v. McNeely

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 2013

Robinson, IE sei scnsths iniiccidcishenspneeasncceseoesss 24, 25 Vale v. Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1970)..................06.. 17 Virginia v. … Bohling, 173 Wis.2d 24 529, 494 N.W.2d 399 (1993) (cert. den., 510 U.S. 836).

Brief — Holsey Ellingburg, Jr., Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief · Aug 22, 2025

No. 24-482 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— HOLSEY ELLINGBURG, JR., Petitioner, v. … Mitchell, 303 U.S. 391, 399 (1938); see, e.g., Hudson, 522 U.S. at 103.

Jurisdictional Statement — Edwards v. Healy

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1975

Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964); (c) Palmetto Fire Insurance Company v. Connec- ticut, 272 U.S. 295 (1926). … Hence we con- sider that Hoyt is no longer binding. 24 V.

Reply Brief — Bowen v. Gilliard

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1987

University Committee, 399 U.S. 383 (1970) _.... 17 Heckler v. Turner, 470 U.S. 184 (1985) 20, 19 Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678 (1978) 20 Johnson v. Johnson, 14 N.C. App. 378, 188 S.E. … University Committee, 399 U.S. 383 (1970). As discussed more fully in the State’s Brief on the Merits (pp. 17-24), the opin- ion in Gilliard v.

Reply Brief — Illinois v. Rodriguez

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1990

Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970). … Br. 22-24) That argument is irrele- vant because agency law has nothing to do with this case.

Appellants Reply Brief — Bread Political Action Committee v. FEC

Supreme Court brief · Appellants Reply Brief · 1982

Br. at 24 (Emphasis supplied). 11 to perceive how such an irrational consequence furthers any compelling interest. … Br. at 19, n.24, 24, n.32; Abood, supra, 431 U.S. at 234; Broderick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 606, 616 (1973).

Appellants Reply Brief — Sitton v. Texas

Supreme Court brief · Appellants Reply Brief · 1981

The CCrA relied on GOODWIN v STATE 138 SW 399 and quoteu from that opinion as follows: "Very few people in driving a car have an evil intent; but the Legislature, in protection of the public, has decreed … In WILSON 59 SW(2) 399 (1933), the Court threw out the first Dwi statute as being void for vagueness.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Chas. S. Tanner Co. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985

On November 24, 1982, the parties exchanged lists of exhibits. On November 26, 1982, pursuant to the local court rule set forth above, the parties submitted trial briefs? … Michigan Rule 24(b); D. Kansas Rule 20(c). The District of South Carolina seems to stand alone in expressly prohibit- ing the exchange of trial briefs.

Petition — McDonald v. West Branch

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984

Babcock & Wilcox Co., 24 FEP Cases 794 (N.D. Ohio 1980) (42 U.S.C. $1981). … Babcock & Wilcox Co., 24 FEP Cases 794 (N.D. Ohio 1980) (42 U.S.C. §1981).

Opposition Brief — Ma v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990

Lacke, 885 F.2d 399 (7th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 110 S. Ct. 1476 (1990)............. 8 Hilton v. … Beckers & Le Hanne, 24 Bankr. 198 (S.D.N.Y. 1982), cited by Ma, did not address this issue.

Opposition Brief — Parlavecchio v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994

On July 24, 1989, Nicholas told Campos that they needed five “here” (in New Jersey) and ten “down there” (in Florida). … Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970), it eliminated any Confrontation Clause objection to Hamilton Campos’s statements. United States v. Owens, 484 U.S. 554, 560 (1988). c.

Opposition Brief — United States ex rel. O'Connell v. Chapman University

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2011

Richardson, 399 U.S. 920 (1970) Castro Cor nity, Tex. vu. Cresm 101 F.3d 121 (D.C. Cir. 1996 Clark v. Arizona. 548 U.S. 735 (2006 (°/2) LO? … The district court entered judgment for respondent on October 24, 2007. C.D. Cal Docket # 204; E.R. 5. C.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Ford Motor Motor Co. v. Buell-Wilson (No. 09-297)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 402-03 (1966). … Corp., 24 F.3d 809, 811 (6th Cir. 1994) (discussing EPA’s risk-benefit analyses); Rhone- Poulenc, Inc v. FDA, 636 F.2d 750, 754 (D.C.

Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Livingston v. Shelton

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1976

Ct. 399, 63 L. Ed. 876 (1919)... 19 Zucht v. King, 260 U.S. 174, 43 S. Ct. 24, 62 L. … Ct. 24, 62 L. Ed. 194.