Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.15s
Opposition Brief — Anascape, Ltd. v. Nintendo of America, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2010
FLEMING 399 Park Avenue LAUREN B. … FLEMING 399 Park Avenue ILAUREN B.
562 U.S. 1004Reply Brief — Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, 135 S. Ct. 2311 (2015) (No. 14-857)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2015
Co., 513 U.S. at 24 (citation omitted); see Sinochem Int'l. Co. v. … McKnight, 521 U.S. 399, 409 (1997), is not to the contrary. Cf. Resp. Br. 51 n.16.
Opposition Brief — RH Capital Associates LLC v. Mayer Brown LLP
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2011
Bridgestone Corp., 399 F.3d 651 (6th Cir. 2005).....18, 14 Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. Fox, 464 U.S. 523 (1984) ...... 18 Dinsmore v. … Bridgestone Corp., 399 F.3d 651 (6th Cir. 2005), also does not conflict with the Second Circuit’s decision.
564 U.S. 1018Brief for Appellee — Harris County Commissioners Court v. Moore
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Appellee · 1975
THERE IS NO BASIS FOR APPLICATION OF Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964) ........66.0005 71-1364 (E.D. La. 1971): 390 US. 474 (1 v. Arron, 358 U ay i eeiicencesecet on eemcemmadiemeahn (E.D. La. … Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964) (printing of candidates race on the ballot held invalid).
420 U.S. 77Amicus Curiae Brief — Alexander v. Sandoval
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Heth, 3 Cranch 399 (1806).................... 3,17 United States v. Western Pacific Railroad Co., 352 Ee 5 University of California Board of Regents v. … Heth, 3 Cranch 399, 413 (1806) (Paterson, J.)
532 U.S. 275Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brawner-Ahlstrom v. Husson
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999
One hundred percent of outbound mail received by her staff is processed in 24 hours, and this is a remarkable improvement...” … VI, Sec. 5(3), and §24-51-1105, C.R.S. 1997, App. 2 C.
527 U.S. 1004Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1975
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923) and Board of Regents v. … Tebralltece U.S. 390, 399 (1923) ; Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 572 (1972) : Pickering v. Board of Education, 391-U.S. 563 (1968). Cf. Wisconsin v.
421 U.S. 35Opposition Brief — Alexander Balbuena, Petitioner v. Brian Cates, Acting Warden
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · May 3, 2021
Wainwright 477 U.S. 399 (1986) .............................................. 19 Fuller v. … Pet. 23; see id. at 23-24; see also Pet. App. 48a49a (Fletcher, J., concurring in the result).
Opposition Brief — Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Board, Petitioner v. Federal Trade Commission
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Mar 15, 2021
McKnight, 521 U.S. 399 (1997) ................... 15 Salt River Project v. Tesla Energy Operations, Inc., 138 S. … Given the Eleventh Circuit’s briefing order, petitioner is wrong to contend (Pet. 24) that “the precise question of interest to that court is unclear.”
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 4, 2022
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ....................................................... 12 Gomez v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for N. … The State, it says (at 24-25), can simply amend its execution method to authorize a constitutional one.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. Norma Anderson, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 5, 2024
Burke, 179 U.S. 399, 403 (1900), and that’s a provision-specific question, after all. III. … WRIGLEY Attorney General State of North Dakota 24 DAVID A.
Amicus Curiae Brief — National Rifle Association of America, Petitioner v. Maria T. Vullo
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 19, 2025
Ct. 2419 (2023) ...................................... 10, 24 Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986) ................................ 3, 6, 8, 9, 11 Milner v. … McKnight, 521 U.S. 399 (1997) ................................................11 Rogers v. Jarrett, 63 F.4th 971 (5th Cir. 2023) ............................ 18, 20 Ross v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 18, 2026
All. for Hippocratic Med., 602 U.S. at 399 (Thomas, J., concurring); see Indus. Energy Consumers of Am. v. FERC, 125 F.4th 1156, 1167 (D.C. Cir. 2025) (Henderson, J., concurring). … Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413, 423–24 (2021). This Court should recommit the judiciary to its proper constitutional role.
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Scheffer
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Watson, 248 N.W.2d 398, 399 (S.D. 1976); accord State v. Muetze, 368 N.W.2d 575 (S.D. 1985); see also Sabag v. … Gipson, 24 M.J. 246 (C.M.A. 1987).
523 U.S. 303Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Oct 31, 2022
Supp. 3d 419 (D.D.C. 2018) .................. 24 Rostker v. … United States, 365 U.S. 399, 410 (1961) (consulting “[a] number of ... sources,” including statements of committee chair and staff).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 20, 2021
Br. at 24 (citing Frank v. Walker, 768 F.3d 744, 753 (7th Cir. 2014)); see also United States Amicus Br. in Supp. of Pet’rs at 21–24 (“U.S. Br.”); Ariz. … Br. at 21–24; ARP Br. at 29–30. Petitioners are wrong for three main reasons.
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · Dec 22, 2023
Id. at 2323-24. … See Jurisdictional Statement at 23-24. For example, Moore v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Christopher Collings, Petitioner v. David Vandergriff, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 18, 2024
Collings, 450 S.W.3d 741 (Mo. banc 2014) .................... 5, 8, 9, 14, 16, 17, 24 State v. … Himmelman, 399 S.W.2d 58 (Mo. 1966) ...................................................... 23 State v. Mitchell, 659 S.W.2d 4 (Mo.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Prescott v. County of El Dorado
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003
Casey, 956 F.2d 399, 410 (3d Cir.1992). … Id. at 24-26.
537 U.S. 1188Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Wright v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970
New York, 333 U.S. 507 (1948) 24 viii a Cases Page Yick Wo v. … Baxley, 355 U.S. 313, 322 (1958)). 24.
398 U.S. 939
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.