Documents

Brief for the US — Noto v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the US · 1961

United States, 365 U.S. 399, 413; Barenblatt v. United States, 360 U.S. 109, 125. … S. 399.

DRAFT: June 24, 2026

Court rules · Court rule

CJA. 4-202.02 DRAFT: June 24, 2026 1 2 3 Rule 4-202.02. … investigation; CJA. 4-202.02 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399

Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

Federal Register · Notice · Feb 5, 2016

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 24 CFR part 581 and section 501 of the Stewart B. … For complete details concerning the processing of applications, the reader is encouraged to refer to the interim rule governing this program, 24 CFR part 581.

Opposition Brief — Lanham Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004

The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on August 24, 2004. The jurisdiction of this court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1). . STATEMENT 1. … Kia Motors America, Inc., 357 F.3d 392, 398-399 (3d Cir. 2004). The next step is typically to examine the defendant’s petition for removal. Mehlenbacher, 216 F.3d at 296.

Reply Brief — Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Chittum

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1996

with evidence of Chit- tum’s likely future pay increases, R. 292A-292E, as well as his inability to increase the retirement pension annuity he would re- ceive after his disability annuity expired, R. 399 … Respondent’s tortured history of the Culver case, Opp. 23-24, does nothing to reduce the relevance of this issue under the LHWCA.

Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Hostetter v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1941

Herbert Hostetter, (Unre- ported opinion of the Orphans’ Court)..... 19 In re Estate of Miller, 184 Cal. 674.............. 11 In re Estate of Rath, 10 Cal. (2d) 399.......... 11 In re Heilbron Bros … A. 413........ 24 Lentz v. Commissioner, 21 B. T. A. 1336, 1342.. 24 Quinn v. Union Nat. Bk., 32 Fed. (2d) 762...... 13 United States v. Kombst, 286 U.S. 424......... 11 Washburn v.

Opinion — Nadal v. May

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1914

The validating act of February 24, 1903, was not ef- fectual. … Eq. 394, 399; Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Texas, 170 U. 8. 243, 261. See also Gunn v. Barry, 15 Wall. 610, 622; Ar- nett v. Reade, 220 U.S. 311, 320.

Oral argument — United States v. Ignacio Galvan-Benavides

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2010

If that's the case, then how do we get around the Supreme Court cases that have approved third-strike punishment for offenses as minor as stealing $399 worth of goods from a store? … So the district court did not abuse its discretion in deciding that something substantially more severe than 24 months was necessary to deter this defendant's illegal criminal conduct.

Opinion — Munsey v. Webb

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1913

A. 399. To the same effect are: Reeves vy. Wallace, 10 Wall. 176; Morrison vy. Davis, 20 Pa. St. 293; Cuff v. N. & M. Y. R. Co., 35 N. J. L. 18; Smith v. Kanawha County (West Va.), 8 L. R. … (Va.), 24 8. E. Rep. 467; Fowlks v. Southern Ry. Co. (Va.), 32 8. E. Rep. 464; Winfree v. Jones (Va.), 51 S. E. Rep. 153; S. C., 1 L. R. A. (N. S.), 201.

Reply Brief — Carlos Javier Pedroza-Rocha, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 22, 2020

BIO 21–24. This misinterprets Mendoza-Lopez. … Contrary to the government’s assertion, BIO 24–25, he meets the remaining § 1326(d) requirements.

Brief for the Respondent in Oppositionmm — Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Cabot Carbon Co.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Oppositionmm · 1954

Oklahoma Natural Gas Co., 4 F. 24 399, appeal dismissed 269 U.S. 527. 24 Columbian Fuel Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 271 P.2d 773 . oat 17 Consumers Gas Co. v. … Binford, 286 U.S. 374, 390... 24 State ex rel. Roth v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Acosta v. Texas (No. 05-1574)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006

Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508 (2003) Justifies A Reexamination Of The Anti ee ee ie 13 CAME i ss eek os bP eK cas Hamre ee 24 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES FEDERAL CASES Bowers … Each state is obligated to follow the Constitution. 24 It should also be remembered that the statute extends beyond commercial transactions.

Brief for the United States — United States v. Ragen

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1942

OE a 24 at all follow that even where some services may have been rendered, the distributions may not be dividends in their entirety. … Wurzbach, 280 U.S. 296, 399.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bharanidharan Padmanabhan, Petitioner v. Drug Enforcement Administration

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 25, 2019

Robert Chatfield-Taylor, 399 Mass. 1 (1987) 19,23 Flyers Rights Educ. Fund v. FAA, 864 F.3d 738 (DC Cir. 2017). 2 Gonzales v. … Robert Chatfield-Taylor, 399 Mass. 1 (1987).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brian L. Melson, Petitioner v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 7, 2022

Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 412 114 S.Ct. 958, 127 L.Ed.2d 252 (1994)____ Mattz v. Arnett 412 U.S. 481, 504, n. 22, 93 S.Ct. 2245, 37 L.Ed.2d (1973) Nebraska v. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 412 114 S.Ct. 958, 127 L.Ed.2d 252 (1994). Likewise, Congress might speak of a reservation as being “’discontinued, ” “abolished,” or “vacated.”Mattz v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lawrence T. Newman, Petitioner v. Robert W. York

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 9, 2021

Johnson et al, 24 How., 203; Boswell's Lessee v. Otis et al., 9 How., 350; Oakley v. Aspinwall, 4 Comst., 514. … process has been interpreted by this Court as preventing the states from denying litigants use of established adjudicatory procedures, when such an action would be “the equivalent of denying them an 24

Petitioners Brief — Collins v. Youngblood

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1990

Graham, 450 U.S. 24 (1981). . .9,10,13,14,20 Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970).......... 23 Constitutions, Statutes and Rules eR be eee YS ree 2,8 ee Coes oa eee oko 2 Tex. Code Crim. … Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981).

Petitioners Brief — Collins v. Youngblood

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1990

Graham, 450 U.S. 24 (1981). . .9,10,13,14,20 Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). ......... 23 Constitutions, Statutes and Rules IJ te penes 2.8 ß, ˙ ek ee ˙ oe bt 2 Tex. Code Crim. Proc. … Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981).

Amicus Brief — Colorado v. Quintero

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1983

City of Houston, 689 F. 2d 1220 (5th Cir. 1982). 24. … Interview with James Larkin, Assistant District Attorney of Harris County, Texas, in Houston, Nov. 24, 1980.

Opposition — Western Coal Traffic League v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

No, 96-254, 94 Stat. 399 4 Stagwers Rail Act of 1980, Pub, L. … No, 96-254, 94 Stat. 399; Milwaukee Railroad Restructuring Act, Pub, L. No, 96-101, 93 Stat. 736.