Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters2003

10,000+ results

0.14s

  • Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

    Federal Register · Notice · Feb 5, 2016

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 24 CFR part 581 and section 501 of the Stewart B. … For complete details concerning the processing of applications, the reader is encouraged to refer to the interim rule governing this program, 24 CFR part 581.

    81 FR 6287Housing and Urban Development Department
  • Opposition Brief — Lanham Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004

    The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on August 24, 2004. The jurisdiction of this court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1). . STATEMENT 1. … Kia Motors America, Inc., 357 F.3d 392, 398-399 (3d Cir. 2004). The next step is typically to examine the defendant’s petition for removal. Mehlenbacher, 216 F.3d at 296.

    543 U.S. 957
  • Reply Brief — Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Chittum

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1996

    with evidence of Chit- tum’s likely future pay increases, R. 292A-292E, as well as his inability to increase the retirement pension annuity he would re- ceive after his disability annuity expired, R. 399 … Respondent’s tortured history of the Culver case, Opp. 23-24, does nothing to reduce the relevance of this issue under the LHWCA.

    519 U.S. 1034
  • Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Hostetter v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1941

    Herbert Hostetter, (Unre- ported opinion of the Orphans’ Court)..... 19 In re Estate of Miller, 184 Cal. 674.............. 11 In re Estate of Rath, 10 Cal. (2d) 399.......... 11 In re Heilbron Bros … A. 413........ 24 Lentz v. Commissioner, 21 B. T. A. 1336, 1342.. 24 Quinn v. Union Nat. Bk., 32 Fed. (2d) 762...... 13 United States v. Kombst, 286 U.S. 424......... 11 Washburn v.

    312 U.S. 679
  • Opinion — Nadal v. May

    Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1914

    The validating act of February 24, 1903, was not ef- fectual. … Eq. 394, 399; Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Texas, 170 U. 8. 243, 261. See also Gunn v. Barry, 15 Wall. 610, 622; Ar- nett v. Reade, 220 U.S. 311, 320.

    233 U.S. 447
  • Oral argument — United States v. Ignacio Galvan-Benavides

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2010

    If that's the case, then how do we get around the Supreme Court cases that have approved third-strike punishment for offenses as minor as stealing $399 worth of goods from a store? … So the district court did not abuse its discretion in deciding that something substantially more severe than 24 months was necessary to deter this defendant's illegal criminal conduct.

    18 min of audio
  • Opinion — Munsey v. Webb

    Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1913

    A. 399. To the same effect are: Reeves vy. Wallace, 10 Wall. 176; Morrison vy. Davis, 20 Pa. St. 293; Cuff v. N. & M. Y. R. Co., 35 N. J. L. 18; Smith v. Kanawha County (West Va.), 8 L. R. … (Va.), 24 8. E. Rep. 467; Fowlks v. Southern Ry. Co. (Va.), 32 8. E. Rep. 464; Winfree v. Jones (Va.), 51 S. E. Rep. 153; S. C., 1 L. R. A. (N. S.), 201.

    231 U.S. 150
  • Reply Brief — Carlos Javier Pedroza-Rocha, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 22, 2020

    BIO 21–24. This misinterprets Mendoza-Lopez. … Contrary to the government’s assertion, BIO 24–25, he meets the remaining § 1326(d) requirements.

  • Brief for the Respondent in Oppositionmm — Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Cabot Carbon Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Oppositionmm · 1954

    Oklahoma Natural Gas Co., 4 F. 24 399, appeal dismissed 269 U.S. 527. 24 Columbian Fuel Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 271 P.2d 773 . oat 17 Consumers Gas Co. v. … Binford, 286 U.S. 374, 390... 24 State ex rel. Roth v.

    348 U.S. 867
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals L.P., Petitioner v. Powder Springs Logistics, LLC, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 11, 2026

    (D.I. 397 at 24; D.I. 399, ex. … (D.I. 397 at 24 (citing D.I. 399, ex. B at ¶¶ 105-07)) But all that Dr.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Acosta v. Texas (No. 05-1574)

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006

    Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508 (2003) Justifies A Reexamination Of The Anti ee ee ie 13 CAME i ss eek os bP eK cas Hamre ee 24 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES FEDERAL CASES Bowers … Each state is obligated to follow the Constitution. 24 It should also be remembered that the statute extends beyond commercial transactions.

  • Brief for the United States — United States v. Ragen

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1942

    OE a 24 at all follow that even where some services may have been rendered, the distributions may not be dividends in their entirety. … Wurzbach, 280 U.S. 296, 399.

    314 U.S. 513
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bharanidharan Padmanabhan, Petitioner v. Drug Enforcement Administration

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 25, 2019

    Robert Chatfield-Taylor, 399 Mass. 1 (1987) 19,23 Flyers Rights Educ. Fund v. FAA, 864 F.3d 738 (DC Cir. 2017). 2 Gonzales v. … Robert Chatfield-Taylor, 399 Mass. 1 (1987).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brian L. Melson, Petitioner v. Oklahoma

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 7, 2022

    Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 412 114 S.Ct. 958, 127 L.Ed.2d 252 (1994)____ Mattz v. Arnett 412 U.S. 481, 504, n. 22, 93 S.Ct. 2245, 37 L.Ed.2d (1973) Nebraska v. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 412 114 S.Ct. 958, 127 L.Ed.2d 252 (1994). Likewise, Congress might speak of a reservation as being “’discontinued, ” “abolished,” or “vacated.”Mattz v.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lawrence T. Newman, Petitioner v. Robert W. York

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 9, 2021

    Johnson et al, 24 How., 203; Boswell's Lessee v. Otis et al., 9 How., 350; Oakley v. Aspinwall, 4 Comst., 514. … process has been interpreted by this Court as preventing the states from denying litigants use of established adjudicatory procedures, when such an action would be “the equivalent of denying them an 24

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Schwartz v. Pennsylvania

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970

    The Penal Code Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, § 302, 18 P. … The Penal Code, Act of June 24, 1939, P.

    398 U.S. 957
  • Petitioners Brief — Collins v. Youngblood

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1990

    Graham, 450 U.S. 24 (1981). . .9,10,13,14,20 Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970).......... 23 Constitutions, Statutes and Rules eR be eee YS ree 2,8 ee Coes oa eee oko 2 Tex. Code Crim. … Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981).

    497 U.S. 37
  • Petitioners Brief — Collins v. Youngblood

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1990

    Graham, 450 U.S. 24 (1981). . .9,10,13,14,20 Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). ......... 23 Constitutions, Statutes and Rules IJ te penes 2.8 ß, ˙ ek ee ˙ oe bt 2 Tex. Code Crim. Proc. … Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981).

    497 U.S. 37
  • Amicus Brief — Colorado v. Quintero

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1983

    City of Houston, 689 F. 2d 1220 (5th Cir. 1982). 24. … Interview with James Larkin, Assistant District Attorney of Harris County, Texas, in Houston, Nov. 24, 1980.

    463 U.S. 1206
  • Opposition — Western Coal Traffic League v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

    No, 96-254, 94 Stat. 399 4 Stagwers Rail Act of 1980, Pub, L. … No, 96-254, 94 Stat. 399; Milwaukee Railroad Restructuring Act, Pub, L. No, 96-101, 93 Stat. 736.

    462 U.S. 1110

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.