Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.14s
Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless
Federal Register · Notice · Feb 5, 2016
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 24 CFR part 581 and section 501 of the Stewart B. … For complete details concerning the processing of applications, the reader is encouraged to refer to the interim rule governing this program, 24 CFR part 581.
81 FR 6287Housing and Urban Development DepartmentOpposition Brief — Lanham Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004
The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on August 24, 2004. The jurisdiction of this court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1). . STATEMENT 1. … Kia Motors America, Inc., 357 F.3d 392, 398-399 (3d Cir. 2004). The next step is typically to examine the defendant’s petition for removal. Mehlenbacher, 216 F.3d at 296.
543 U.S. 957Reply Brief — Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Chittum
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1996
with evidence of Chit- tum’s likely future pay increases, R. 292A-292E, as well as his inability to increase the retirement pension annuity he would re- ceive after his disability annuity expired, R. 399 … Respondent’s tortured history of the Culver case, Opp. 23-24, does nothing to reduce the relevance of this issue under the LHWCA.
519 U.S. 1034Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Hostetter v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1941
Herbert Hostetter, (Unre- ported opinion of the Orphans’ Court)..... 19 In re Estate of Miller, 184 Cal. 674.............. 11 In re Estate of Rath, 10 Cal. (2d) 399.......... 11 In re Heilbron Bros … A. 413........ 24 Lentz v. Commissioner, 21 B. T. A. 1336, 1342.. 24 Quinn v. Union Nat. Bk., 32 Fed. (2d) 762...... 13 United States v. Kombst, 286 U.S. 424......... 11 Washburn v.
312 U.S. 679Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1914
The validating act of February 24, 1903, was not ef- fectual. … Eq. 394, 399; Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Texas, 170 U. 8. 243, 261. See also Gunn v. Barry, 15 Wall. 610, 622; Ar- nett v. Reade, 220 U.S. 311, 320.
233 U.S. 447Oral argument — United States v. Ignacio Galvan-Benavides
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2010
If that's the case, then how do we get around the Supreme Court cases that have approved third-strike punishment for offenses as minor as stealing $399 worth of goods from a store? … So the district court did not abuse its discretion in deciding that something substantially more severe than 24 months was necessary to deter this defendant's illegal criminal conduct.
18 min of audioSupreme Court brief · Opinion · 1913
A. 399. To the same effect are: Reeves vy. Wallace, 10 Wall. 176; Morrison vy. Davis, 20 Pa. St. 293; Cuff v. N. & M. Y. R. Co., 35 N. J. L. 18; Smith v. Kanawha County (West Va.), 8 L. R. … (Va.), 24 8. E. Rep. 467; Fowlks v. Southern Ry. Co. (Va.), 32 8. E. Rep. 464; Winfree v. Jones (Va.), 51 S. E. Rep. 153; S. C., 1 L. R. A. (N. S.), 201.
231 U.S. 150Reply Brief — Carlos Javier Pedroza-Rocha, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 22, 2020
BIO 21–24. This misinterprets Mendoza-Lopez. … Contrary to the government’s assertion, BIO 24–25, he meets the remaining § 1326(d) requirements.
Brief for the Respondent in Oppositionmm — Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Cabot Carbon Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Oppositionmm · 1954
Oklahoma Natural Gas Co., 4 F. 24 399, appeal dismissed 269 U.S. 527. 24 Columbian Fuel Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 271 P.2d 773 . oat 17 Consumers Gas Co. v. … Binford, 286 U.S. 374, 390... 24 State ex rel. Roth v.
348 U.S. 867Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 11, 2026
(D.I. 397 at 24; D.I. 399, ex. … (D.I. 397 at 24 (citing D.I. 399, ex. B at ¶¶ 105-07)) But all that Dr.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Acosta v. Texas (No. 05-1574)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508 (2003) Justifies A Reexamination Of The Anti ee ee ie 13 CAME i ss eek os bP eK cas Hamre ee 24 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES FEDERAL CASES Bowers … Each state is obligated to follow the Constitution. 24 It should also be remembered that the statute extends beyond commercial transactions.
Brief for the United States — United States v. Ragen
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1942
OE a 24 at all follow that even where some services may have been rendered, the distributions may not be dividends in their entirety. … Wurzbach, 280 U.S. 296, 399.
314 U.S. 513Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 25, 2019
Robert Chatfield-Taylor, 399 Mass. 1 (1987) 19,23 Flyers Rights Educ. Fund v. FAA, 864 F.3d 738 (DC Cir. 2017). 2 Gonzales v. … Robert Chatfield-Taylor, 399 Mass. 1 (1987).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brian L. Melson, Petitioner v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 7, 2022
Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 412 114 S.Ct. 958, 127 L.Ed.2d 252 (1994)____ Mattz v. Arnett 412 U.S. 481, 504, n. 22, 93 S.Ct. 2245, 37 L.Ed.2d (1973) Nebraska v. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 412 114 S.Ct. 958, 127 L.Ed.2d 252 (1994). Likewise, Congress might speak of a reservation as being “’discontinued, ” “abolished,” or “vacated.”Mattz v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lawrence T. Newman, Petitioner v. Robert W. York
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 9, 2021
Johnson et al, 24 How., 203; Boswell's Lessee v. Otis et al., 9 How., 350; Oakley v. Aspinwall, 4 Comst., 514. … process has been interpreted by this Court as preventing the states from denying litigants use of established adjudicatory procedures, when such an action would be “the equivalent of denying them an 24
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Schwartz v. Pennsylvania
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970
The Penal Code Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, § 302, 18 P. … The Penal Code, Act of June 24, 1939, P.
398 U.S. 957Petitioners Brief — Collins v. Youngblood
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1990
Graham, 450 U.S. 24 (1981). . .9,10,13,14,20 Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970).......... 23 Constitutions, Statutes and Rules eR be eee YS ree 2,8 ee Coes oa eee oko 2 Tex. Code Crim. … Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981).
497 U.S. 37Petitioners Brief — Collins v. Youngblood
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1990
Graham, 450 U.S. 24 (1981). . .9,10,13,14,20 Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). ......... 23 Constitutions, Statutes and Rules IJ te penes 2.8 ß, ˙ ek ee ˙ oe bt 2 Tex. Code Crim. Proc. … Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981).
497 U.S. 37Amicus Brief — Colorado v. Quintero
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1983
City of Houston, 689 F. 2d 1220 (5th Cir. 1982). 24. … Interview with James Larkin, Assistant District Attorney of Harris County, Texas, in Houston, Nov. 24, 1980.
463 U.S. 1206Opposition — Western Coal Traffic League v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983
No, 96-254, 94 Stat. 399 4 Stagwers Rail Act of 1980, Pub, L. … No, 96-254, 94 Stat. 399; Milwaukee Railroad Restructuring Act, Pub, L. No, 96-101, 93 Stat. 736.
462 U.S. 1110
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.