Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.40s
Brief for the respondent — Ceballos v. Shaughnessy
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the respondent · 1957
ceist fais, ys 24 - ‘ The language abana ans eupiew ss 24 404786—56—-—1 (1) / / : I Abebisins-ASaiiaial ; III. Debarment from citizenship, etc. sail ry, : A. The language, purpose, etc. … Brownell, now pending on petition — for a wrif’ of certiorari No. 399, this Term, has the point arisen.’
352 U.S. 599Respondents Brief — Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Delgado
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1984
Cortez, 449 U.S. 411 (1981) .............45 le a 13, 14, 23, 24, 32, 39, United States v. Grandi, 424 F.2d 399 (2d Cir. 1970) ..... … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 48 (1970).
466 U.S. 210Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Liner v. Jafco, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1963
AS. 1900 (effective Octo- ee Ses asa ices eantax. bene 5, 8, 46 Colombia, October 24, 1956, Art. 7(a), effective provisionally January 1, 1957 (State. Dep't . … ‘Art. 24.—Every hiorbiledinn "et a contracting State, Which upon payment t charges is open to — use - oa .
371 U.S. 961Federal Register · Notice · Feb 14, 2023
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87028 (September 19, 2019) 84 FR 50529 (September 25, 2019) (SR-CBOE-2019-061). 4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88741 (April 24, 2020) … Particularly, the Exchange proposes to adopt a monthly fee of $399 per Login ID for the first 8 Login IDs ( i.e., Login IDs 1-8), a fee of $299 per each additional Login ID for the next 8 Login IDs
88 FR 9548Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
Rul. 74-611, 1974-2 C.B. 399. 2. Shelley Since the overpayment was attributable entirely to taxes withheld from Shelley's income, she alone has any interest in the refund of the overpayment. … --For purposes of section 6511 or 6512-(1) Any tax actually deducted and withheld at the source during any calendar year under chapter 24 shall, in respect of the recipient of the income, be deemed to
United States Tax CourtSupreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 15, 2019
That petition was dismissed on the merits on August 24, 2015 (ECF No. 73). On May 5, 2016 a certificate of appealability was denied by the Court of Appeals (ECF No. 82). … relies on McQuiggin which he contends was a change in relevanfdecisional law and permits the review of the “extraordinary circumstance” which justify relief Under F.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6).2 In McQuiggjn at p. 399
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 5, 2018
Bank of Am., 723 F.3d 399, 403 (2d Cir. 2013) (quoting Triestman v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 470 F.3d 471, 474 (2d Cir. 2006)); see also Tracy v. … Nelson, 617 F.2d 9169 923-24 (2d Cir. 1980) (holding that inmates have no due process interest in avoiding classification that might preclude or delay benefits).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kyle Costello, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 18, 2018
Woolfolk, 399 F.3d 590, 596 (4th Cir. 2005). This is known as the “ruse” exception. See United States v. Benitez, 34 F.3d 1489, 1494 (9th Cir. 1994). … KYLE COSTELLO, Appellant, --- Fed.Appx. ---- (2018) Costello's return to Pennsylvania until February 24, 2014, and even then continued to build the Commonwealth's case against Costello because he was
Prologue — Edmonds v. Department of Justice
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005
Raus, 399 F.2d 785 (4th Cir. 1968).................. 20, 21 vii Herring v. … United States, 444 U.S. 507 (1980) cessescssscssssessssee 24 Spock v. United States, 404 F. Supp. 510 EPID BO Fa piciivewscisiniiinictelocticaiaabspitiiniitpacdidebummdnsebiainiin 19 Tenet v.
546 U.S. 1031Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005
Chambers Test. at 399..Then he told her that she was at her full promotion potential as a GS-11 (a fact that is irrelevant to a GAD promotion). Chambers Dep. at 39. … Report of Investigation/ EEO Counselor's Report, November 24, 200, at 3; Chambers Dep. At 64. Mr.
546 U.S. 979Motion to Dismiss — General Dynamics Corp. v. Marshall
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1979
Thereafter, appellant filed a timely notice of appeal to this Court under Supreme Court Rule 11(1) with the Missouri Supreme Court on February 24, 1978. … Amerison, 399 S.W.2d 53 (Mo. 1966). And appellant's assertions alone will not sustain his burden of proof. State v. Mooring, 445 S.W.2d 303 (Mo. 1969); State v.
441 U.S. 919Opposition — Gibson v. Missouri (Nos. 77-6701, 77-6856, 6088, 6553, 7012)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
D | fe JUL 24 1978 Or ape Beane! Gk RK — Supaché Coukt, U.S. Le SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TERM, 1978 O. 77-6701 \ », S EN le ee Nc HERBERT BURNFIN, < Petitioner, rf Vv. … Respectfully submitted, JOHN ASHCROFT Attorney General NANETTE LAUGHREY Assistant Attorney General Supreme Court Building Post Office Box 399 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 (314) 751-3321 ATTORNEYS
Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Commissioner of Immigration of Port of NY v. Gottlieb
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1924
and travelers for curiosity or pleasure, nor to their legal wives or their children under sixteen years of age who shall accompany a re CIS >: ‘ wy ig RM A ee hr ae ar RN Oe eM Dae a ae Pe a _— 24 … White, 256 U.S. 399. JAMES M. BEck, Solicitor General. Joun W. H. Crim, Assistant Attorney General. Harry 8. RIDGELY, Attorney. FEBRUARY, 1923.
265 U.S. 310Opposition Brief — MacLeod v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1971
Miriani, 422 F.2d 150, 153-154 (CUA. 6), certiovart denied, 399 U.S. 910: Feichtmetr v. United States, 389 F.2d 498 (CLA. 9): Hensley v. United States, 406 F. 2d 481, 484 (CLA. 10). … United States, 314 F, 24 306, 310, fn. 3 (CLA, 10); cf. Spies v. United Stctes, 317 U.S. 492, 497-498.
402 U.S. 907Opposition Brief — Freedman v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1976
C) is reported at 399 F. Supp. 668. JURISDICTION The judgment of the court of appeals was entered on January 8, 1976. … its remand to the district t court for further proceedings, review of the instant case ~ : would be inappropriate at this time. : On the basis of the evidence offered at the hearing held i on July 24
425 U.S. 992Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1978
REPLY OF PETITIONER TO RESPONDENTS’ MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI This reply, filed pursuant to Rule 24(4) of the Rules of the Supreme Court, responds to arguments first raised … Carter, 566 F.2d 396, 399 (1977). In each of these cases, a court held that the unavailability of the Customs Court acts to confer original jurisdiction on the district court.“ *In Timken Co. v.
435 U.S. 933Opposition — Schifter v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976
Petitioner contends (Pet. 21-24) that the agents had insufficient probable cause either to arrest him or to seize the boxes of stolen merchandise from his car. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 48; Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23, 42-43. “December 5, 1975 Tr.” refers to the re-opened suppression hear- ing continued on that date.
426 U.S. 920Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Nov 15, 2023
To the Honorable Samuel Alito, Associate Justice, and Circuit Justice for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit: INTRODUCTION David Renteria is due to be executed by Texas in about 24 … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986) (plurality op.); see also Wainwright v.
Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Nov 15, 2023
To the Honorable Samuel Alito, Associate Justice, and Circuit Justice for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit: INTRODUCTION David Renteria is due to be executed by Texas in about 24 … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986) (plurality op.); see also Wainwright v.
Application — Robert Fratta, Petitioner v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Application · Jan 6, 2023
Fratta , 2007 WL 2872698, at *24. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986) (plurality op.); see also Wainwright v.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.