Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.52s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sandlin v. Corporate Interiors, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995
United States, 490 U.S. 545, 109 S.Ct. 2003, 104 L.Ed.2d 593 (1989) * * e e e e - . ° * * , 159 Colo. 326, <i e A” eS wi eee » 193 U.S. 93, 24 S.Ct. 399, 48 L.Ed. … Hunt, 292 U.S. 234, 239, 5 54 S.Ct. 695, 697, 78 L.Ed. 1230 (1934); ’ 193 U.S. 93, 112-114, 24 S.Ct. 399, 407-408, 48 L.Ed. 629 (1904)--we have never reached such a result solely on the basis that
513 U.S. 1083Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Morris v. Rockwell (No. 390)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1961
They are printed in the record (274-399). The decision of the Court of Appeais of the State of New York affirmed without opinion the or- der of the Appellate Division and is not as yet reported. … The dissenting opinion (346-399) discussed at some length the facts relating to the reasons for the refusal of a permit to petitioner, partiewlariy as set forth in the Mayor's affidavit reciting the
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 22, 2018
App. 492 (5th Cir. 2016) .............24 Herb v. Pitcairn, 324 U.S. 117, 65S. Ct. 459 (1945)..........................................3 Kea v. Keys, 83 So. 3d 399 (Miss. Ct. … Keys, 83 So. 3d 399, 405, ¶15 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011) and Newman v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Juan Manuel Sanchez-Jara, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 9, 2018
SEAL "Qe Me OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA No. 14 GJ 1008 %, oy, FOR AN ORDER RELATING TO . ye TELEPHONE NUMBER (312) 399-9606 Rubén Castillo (‘SUBJECT PHONE 14”) AND Chief Judge TELEPHONE NUMBER (708 … Tzur, an attorney for the government, which application relates to: a. the telephone currently assigned telephone number (312) 399-9606, and used by an unidentified individual (“UI5”), with service provided
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 18, 2022
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ........................................... 13, 17 League of Women Voters of Ohio v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 426 (2006) (LULAC) (citing Gingles, 478 U.S. at 44-45).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Erik Egbert, Petitioner v. Robert Boule
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 26, 2022
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970) ................................................ 20 Ziglar v. Abbasi, 137 S. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 145 (1970) (Stewart, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Shaniz West, Petitioner v. Doug Winfield, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 20, 2020
McKnight, 521 U.S. 399 (1997) .............................................. 15 Shannon v. County of Sacramento, 2019 WL 2715623 (E.D. Cal. … McKnight, 521 U.S. 399, 411 (1997).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Adam Samia, aka Sal, aka Adam Samic, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 3, 2023
Legal Stud. 399 (2010) 28 Court Statistics Project, National Center for State Courts https://www.courtstatistics.org/court-statistics/ state-versus-federal-caseloads 24 Court Statistics Project, National … Legal Stud. 399, 400 (2010).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 9, 2025
No. 24-1151 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States BDO USA, LLP, Petitioner, v. NEW ENGLAND CARPENTERS GUARANTEED ANNUITY AND PENSION FUNDS, ET AL., Respondents. … Emulex, 888 F.3d 399 (9th Cir. 2018) .................................. 5 Waterford Township Police & Fire Retirement Sys. v. Regional Management Corp., 2016 WL 1261135 (S.D.N.Y.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — William M. Hilton, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 12, 2026
App. 2017) (alteration in original) (quoting Washington, 57 M.J. at 399), aff’d, 77 M.J. 289 (C.A.A.F. 2018). … The delay in rendering this decision after 24 January 2024 is presumptively unreasonable.
Frontier Gas Storage Company, et al.; Natural Gas Certificate Filings
Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Jul 29, 1994
NGT would (1) replace an existing 1-inch 630 Fisher regulator with a 1-inch 399 Fisher regulator on its transmission Line L at the point where NGT's 3-inch Line AM-173 interconnects with Line L in Section … 17, Township 9 South, Range 20 West, (pipeline station 2833+24) and (2) abandon an inactive 6-inch dual-run meter station and a first cut regulator and relief valve at an existing delivery tap to Arkansas
Energy DepartmentOpposition — Viner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
With respect to the July 24, 1976 transaction, independent evidence showed that Officer Mitchell gave Harrington money for the purchase of heroin. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 155-156; Dutton v.
436 U.S. 904Petitioners Reply Brief — Spaziano v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1984
Petition for Certiorari Petitioner at 24. Petitioner is aware that lower courts have read this Court's decisions in Proffitt, Dobbert, and Barclay as fore- Closing the issue. Id. … New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970) Ball v. State, 204 So.2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967) Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 1223 (1978) ........... 21,: Barclay v. Florida, __. U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 3418 Barclay v.
468 U.S. 447Motion — Zapata Offshore Co. v. Timco, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1986
Supreme Court, U.S, FILED No. 85-2023 SEP 24 1986 OBER HR EKSEENIOL, Jz, In The CLERK Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1986 ray Vv KERR-McGEE CORPORATION and ZAPATA OFFSHORE COMPANY … Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 399 U.S. 352 (1969) ...... IA shat ROR FR VOR NRE ED Ce eS AN 3,5 Seal Offshore, Inc. v. American Standard, Inc., ae sere coe Cor. 1966) _ ‘. - Smith v.
479 U.S. 872Opposition Brief — Meyer v. Weil
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1972
Arkansas, 179 F. 24 709 (8th Cir. 1950). Therefore, bail has been seen as a sufficient restraint only where serving the underlying sentence was inevitable. … Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970).
409 U.S. 1060Memorandum for Respondent — Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum for Respondent · 1943
Upon the remand of the case, the Board 4 reconsidered the entire case upon the original record and on September 24, 1942, issued a new decision (44 N. L. R. … R. 23, 36; R. 56-5Y, 198-201, 341-333, 370, 399-400) ; * in- terrogated employees to discover their union ac- tivities (S.
319 U.S. 533Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005
Smith, 399 S.E.2d 36 (W.Va. 1990) Bhandari v. Advocates Committee, 3 All English Reports 742 (1956) Board v. D.J.I., 545 N.W.2d 866 (Iowa 1996) Board v. … Law Society, 24 NSWLR 202 (New South Wales Supreme Court 1988) Paul v. Virginia, 75 U.S. 168 (1869) People v. Regan, 871 P.2d 1184 (Colo. 1994) Razatos v.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 6, 2021
, Conclusions of Law and Order Terminating Parental Rights and Granting Permanent Legal Custody, Re: Birth Father, entered by the Second Judicial District Court, Butte-Silver Bow County, on February 24 … In re A.L.P., 2020 MT 87, 26, 399 Mont. 504,461 P.3d 136. Much of the delay regarding the treatment plan was caused by Father’s refusal to engage with the Department in any way.
Supplemental Brief of Petitioner — Rosenberg Bros. v. Commodity Credit Corp. (No. 357)
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief of Petitioner · 1957
This brief fs tiled in aecordance with the provisions of Paragraph 4 of Rule 24 of the Supreme Court of the United States. ») ARGUMENT 1. … Wilson Co. 133 F.2d 399 (CLA. D.C.) doés not involve breach of contract but deals with the unilateral mistake of a bidder in omitting an item from - his bid, followed by performance. .
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Rath v. Crosby
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1941
This she refused to do (R. 397, 398, 399, 400). … S. 23, 24; Schneider v. New Jersey, 308 U. S. 147, and cases therein cited in footnote 8; Near v. Minnesota, 283 U. S. 697. C. The Question Presented.
312 U.S. 690
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.