Frontier Gas Storage Company, et al.; Natural Gas Certificate Filings
Federal RegisterJul 29, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP85-221-033, et al.]
Frontier Gas Storage Company, et al.; Natural Gas Certificate
Filings
July 22, 1994.
Take notice that the following filings have been made with the
Commission:
1. Frontier Gas Storage Company
[Docket No. CP85-221-033]
Take notice that on July 19, 1994, Frontier Gas Storage Company
(Frontier), c/o Reid & Priest, Market Square, 701 Pennsylvania Ave.,
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20004, in compliance with the provisions of the
Commission's February 13, 1985, Order in Docket No. CP82-487-000 et
al., submitted an executed Service Agreement under Rate Schedule LVS-1
providing for the possible sale of 400,000 MMBtu of Frontier's gas
storage inventory on an ``in place'' basis to Rainbow Gas Company
(Rainbow).
Under Subpart (b) of Ordering Paragraph (G) of the Commission's
February 13, 1985, Order, Frontier is ``authorized to consummate the
proposed sale in place unless the Commission issues an order within 20
days after expiration of such notice period either directing that the
sale not take place and setting it for hearing or permitting the sale
to go forward and establishing other procedures for resolving the
matter. Deliveries of gas sold in place shall be made pursuant to a
schedule to be set forth in an exhibit to the executed service
agreement.''
Comment date: August 12, 1994, in accordance with the first
paragraph of Standard Paragraph F at the end of this notice.
2. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation
[Docket No. CP94-665-000]
Take notice that on July 18, 1994, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Corporation (Transco), Post Office Box 1396, Houston, Texas 77251,
filed in Docket No. CP94-665-000 a request pursuant to Section 157.205
of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR
157.205) for authorization to construct and operate a new
interconnection between its main line and its West Conshohocken Lateral
in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania,\1\ under Transco's blanket
certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-426-000 pursuant to Section 7 of
the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request which
is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\The West Conshohocken Lateral is used by Transco to deliver
up to 56,000 Mcf of natural gas per day to the distribution system
of PECO Energy Company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transco proposes to construct and operate a 6-inch check valve,
insulating flange assembly and approximately thirty one feet of tie-in
piping to connect Transco's existing West Conshohocken Lateral to an
existing tap on Transco's 36-inch Main Line ``C'' in Montgomery County,
Pennsylvania. Transco states that the West Conshohocken Lateral is tied
into Main Lines ``A'' and ``B''. The Main Line ``A'' pressures are not
high enough at this point to maintain adequate delivery pressure into
the lateral Transco, it is indicated. Transco states that the proposed
interconnection on Main Line ``C'' would enable Transco to maintain
adequate delivery pressure into the lateral since Main Line ``C'' is
operated at a higher pressure than Main Line ``A''.
Transco states that since it is not proposing to increase the
quantities of gas delivered to the lateral or alter the authorized firm
transportation or storage service levels for any customers, the new
interconnection would have no impact on Transco's peak day and annual
deliveries. Transco further states that its existing tariff does not
prohibit the addition of the new interconnection and that it has
sufficient capacity to provide for the proposed deliveries without any
detriment or disadvantage to its existing customers.
Comment date: September 6, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
3. Koch Gateway Pipeline Company
[Docket No. CP94-658-000]
Take notice that on July 13, 1994, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company
(Koch Gateway), P.O. Box 1478, Houston, Texas 77251-1478, filed in
Docket No. CP94-658-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and
157.211(a)(2) of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act
(18 CFR 157.205, 157.211) for authorization to construct and operate a
12-inch tap to provide a delivery point to Cypress Pipeline Company
(Cypress) under Koch Gateway's blanket certificate issued in Docket No.
CP82-430-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more
fully set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and
open to public inspection.
Koch Gateway proposes to install a 12-inch tap and related
facilities on its Kosciusko 30-inch loop line in Assumption Parish,
Louisiana. The customer is currently connected to this line. Koch
Gateway proposes to connect existing metering facilities to its
Kosciusko 30-inch loop line at the same general location. Koch Gateway
proposes only to relocate the tap for existing service to an adjacent
loop line. Koch Gateway states no additional new service is proposed
and no impact will be seen on its curtailment plan. All construction
will be within existing and previously disturbed right-of-way. The
estimated cost is $57,066. Koch Gateway has sufficient capacity to
render the proposed service without detriment or disadvantage to its
other existing customers and its tariff doesn't prohibit the proposed
modification of facilities.
Koch Gateway states it is authorized to provide service to Cypress
under its Docket No. ST90-1195 transportation agreement dated August
19, 1988, pursuant to its blanket certificate in Docket No. CP88-6-000
and under ITS Rate Schedule.
Comment date: September 6, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
4. Texas Gas Transmission Corporation
[Docket No. CP94-667-000]
Take notice that on July 19, 1994, Texas Gas Transmission
Corporation (Texas Gas), 3800 Frederica Street, Owensboro, Kentucky
42301, filed in Docket No. CP94-667-000 a request pursuant to Sections
157.205 and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural
Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.212) for authorization to expand the
utilization of an existing point of delivery to Central Illinois Public
Service Company (CIPS), known as the Cips/Marathon Delivery Point
(Cips/Marathon), located in Crawford County, Illinois under Texas Gas's
blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-407-000 pursuant to
Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the
request that is on file with the Commission and open to public
inspection.
Texas Gas proposes to expand the utilization of the Cips/Marathon
delivery point so that Texas Gas can continue to make deliveries of gas
to CIPS through the Cips/Marathon delivery point, as well as make
direct deliveries of gas transported by Texas Gas to Marathon Oil
Company (Marathon), who operates an oil refinery in Robinson, Illinois,
which is the sole end-user located downstream of the Cips/Marathon
delivery point.
Texas Gas states that Marathon recently requested that Texas Gas
make natural gas deliveries directly to Marathon at the CIPS/Marathon
delivery point, as well as continue to deliver gas to CIPS at such
point. Texas Gas states that because it owns the meter station which
directly interconnects with the facilities of Marathon, direct
deliveries by Texas Gas to Marathon can be accomplished without the
construction of any additional facilities by Texas Gas.
Texas Gas states that the deliveries to Marathon at the CIPS/
Marathon delivery point will initially consist of 24,000 MMBtu per day
of existing interruptible transportation service and 12,000 MMBtu per
day of existing firm transportation service. Texas Gas states that such
services are being provided by Texas Gas pursuant to its blanket
certificate issued in Docket No. CP88-686-000 and Section 284.223 of
the Commission's regulations.
Texas Gas further states that since no incremental firm service is
proposed through the subject delivery point, such deliveries will have
no impact on Texas Gas's peak day and annual deliveries.
Comment date: September 6, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
5. Chandeleur Pipe Line Company
[Docket No. CP94-671-000]
Take notice that on July 20, 1994, Chandeleur Pipe Line Company
(Chandeleur), P.O. Box 740339, New Orleans, Louisiana 70174-0339, filed
in Docket No. CP94-671-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and
157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18
CFR 157.205, 157.216) for authorization to abandon certain lateral
lines and related facilities under Chandeleur's blanket certificate
issued in Docket No. CP89-929-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural
Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is on file
with the Commission and open to public inspection.
Chandeleur proposes to abandon lateral lines and related
facilities, located within the Pascagoula, Mississippi refinery-
chemical complex of Chandeleur's affiliates, Chevron U.S.A. Products
Company and Chevron Chemical Company (Chevron). Chandeleur proposes to
accomplish this abandonment by transferring ownership of these
facilities to Chevron. Chandeleur states that these lines were
authorized by certificates issued in Docket Nos. CP64-37, 30 FPC 1515
(1963), as amended in 36 FPC 492 (1966) and 38 FPC 759 (1967), CP69-76,
42 FPC 20 (1969), and CP86-687-000, 39 FERC 62,041 (1987). Chandeleur
also states that these facilities were only used to provide service for
Chevron and Mississippi Power Company. Chandeleur states that
Mississippi Power Company consents to the proposed abandonment.
Comment date: September 6, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
6. NorAm Gas Transmission Company
[Docket No. CP94-677-000]
Take notice that on July 21, 1994, NorAm Gas Transmission Company
(NGT), 1600 Smith Street, Houston, Texas 77002, filed in Docket No.
CP94-677-000 an application pursuant to Sections 7(b) and 7(c) of the
Natural Gas Act for permission and approval to abandon certain
facilities and for a certificate to construct and operate certain
facilities, all as more fully set forth in the application on file with
the Commission and open to public inspection.
NGT proposes to upgrade an existing regulator and to abandon a
related inactive 6-inch dual-run meter station,2 both of which
sites are located in Clark County, Arkansas. NGT would (1) replace an
existing 1-inch 630 Fisher regulator with a 1-inch 399 Fisher regulator
on its transmission Line L at the point where NGT's 3-inch Line AM-173
interconnects with Line L in Section 17, Township 9 South, Range 20
West, (pipeline station 2833+24) and (2) abandon an inactive 6-inch
dual-run meter station and a first cut regulator and relief valve at an
existing delivery tap to Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company (ALG) on NGT's
Line AM-173 located in Section 16, Township 9 South, Range 20 West
(pipeline station 38+87). NGT states that the proposed activities are
necessary to accommodate increased deliveries of natural gas to
International Paper Company (IPC), an existing industrial customer of
ALG. NGT explains that the increased volumes are due to the
modification and expansion of IPC's plywood plant at Gurdon, Arkansas.
NGT estimates that the future volumes of gas to be delivered to IPC
would be approximately 2,500 Mcf on a peak day and 365,000 Mcf
annually, and states these volumes are within ALG's certificated
entitlements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\NGT advises that the dual 6-inch meter station was originally
installed in 1966 under the certificate issued in Docket No. CP66-
337-000 (36 FPC 19 (1966)) when Line AM-173 was constructed to
deliver gas to a plywood company owned by Arkla, Inc., subsequently
acquired by International Paper Company; the 6-inch meter station
has been inactive for a number of years; the station was replaced by
a 2-inch meter station owned and operated by Arkansas Louisiana Gas
Company, currently active.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment date: August 12, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph F at the end of this notice.
Standard Paragraphs
F. Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with
reference to said application should on or before the comment date,
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the
requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act
(18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission will be
considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken but
will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any
person wishing to become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a
party in any hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in
accordance with the Commission's Rules.
Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter
finds that a grant of the certificate and/or permission and approval
for the proposed abandonment are required by the public convenience and
necessity. If a motion for leave to intervene is timely filed, or if
the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal hearing is
required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.
Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised,
it will be unnecessary for applicant to appear or be represented at the
hearing.
G. Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Sec. 157.205 of the
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-18539 Filed 7-28-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.