Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.10s
Emergency Application — Richard Gerald Jordan, Petitioner v. Mississippi
Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Jun 20, 2025
a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court has been denied or the time for filing such petition has expired, the court shall set an 4 execution date…”); See also Pet. for Cert. in No. 24 … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986). Additionally, a stay of execution is necessary to facilitate a thorough and meaningful review, protecting that same due process right.
Respondents Brief — Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Delgado
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1984
Cortez, 449 U.S. 411 (1981) .............45 le a 13, 14, 23, 24, 32, 39, United States v. Grandi, 424 F.2d 399 (2d Cir. 1970) ..... … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 48 (1970).
466 U.S. 210Brief for the respondent — Ceballos v. Shaughnessy
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the respondent · 1957
ceist fais, ys 24 - ‘ The language abana ans eupiew ss 24 404786—56—-—1 (1) / / : I Abebisins-ASaiiaial ; III. Debarment from citizenship, etc. sail ry, : A. The language, purpose, etc. … Brownell, now pending on petition — for a wrif’ of certiorari No. 399, this Term, has the point arisen.’
352 U.S. 599Federal Register · Rule · Aug 29, 2016
Broomhill Rd., Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland FERROFORTE (gleptoferron injection) Piglets Original approval as a generic copy of NADA 110-399 FOI Summary. 1 The Agency has carefully considered … In the “Sponsor” column, numerically add “016952”. 24.
81 FR 59131Health and Human Services DepartmentFood and Drug AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Jan 25, 2002
L. 99-399, 100 Stat. 876 (42 U.S.C. 2169). § 73.26 [Amended] 22. … § 73.67 [Amended] 24.
67 FR 3584Nuclear Regulatory CommissionRespondents Brief — Wolfson v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1984
JURISDICTION The judgment of the court of appeals was entered on April 24, 1984. A petition for rehearing was denied on May 29, 1984. … called for a response by the attorneys.” 461 4&8. at 399.
469 U.S. 932Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Winbourne
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985
Judgment limiting Eastern’s liability to $225,000.00, plus interest, was entered on January 24, 1983. (Appendix A.) … Wiser, 555 F.2d 1079, 1089 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 922, 98 S.Ct. 399, 54 L.Ed.2d 279 (1977). Domangue v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 542 F.Supp. 643, 653 (E.D. La. 1982).
474 U.S. 1036Appendix — United States ex rel. Potts v. Rabb
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1944
Pothier, 264 U. 8. 399, 402- 403; Johnson v. Hoy, 227 U. S. 245, 247; Glasgow v. Moyer, 225 U. S. 420, 428-430; cf. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn., 319 U. S. 21, 25. … United States, 24 F. (2d) 405, 407-408 (C. C. A. 8); Nanfito v. United States, 20 F. (2d) 376, 378 (C. C. A. 8); United States v. Rubin, 218 Fed. 245, 247-249 (D.
322 U.S. 727Brief for the United States in Opposition — Klapprott v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1949
): The court said (RR. 24-2 * = 6 It is our opinion that the de fe nel- ant’s. initiation of this actionat this late date - The district court denied the motion Ch. 26). … , ‘the order of the district court Wis” _afirmed: (R. 41),-one judge relying primarily on the absence of jurisdiction, although also noting the lack of equity in petitioner's applic ation (R. 32-399¢
335 U.S. 601Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Within time provided by law, the Petitioner filed a Mo- tion for Rehearing in the Court of Appeals of Georgia, said Motion being overruled and denied by the Court of Appeals on April 24, 1980. … marijuana was discovered in plain view on top of a dresser in the master bedroom along 2a with a metric scale, some ziplock plastic bags, several small brown “coin” envelopes, a tin can containing $1,- 399
449 U.S. 900Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lalako Jonathan Jose, Petitioner v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 3, 2025
Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 86 (1970) (“hold[ing] that the 12-man panel is not a necessary ingredient of ‘trial by jury’”); see also State v. … CR-24-0136-PR Court of Appeals, Division Two No. 2 CA-CR 23-0224 Pima County Superior Court No.
Federal Register · Notice · Jun 1, 2020
The on-line Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. … The carrier and drivers must comply with all other requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (49 CFR parts 350-399) and Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR parts 105-180).
85 FR 33272Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationHours of Service of Drivers: Extreme Logistics, LLC, Application for Exemption
Federal Register · Notice · May 18, 2020
The on-line Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. … The carrier and drivers must comply with all other applicable requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (49 CFR parts 350-399) and Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR parts 105-180
85 FR 29782Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationChanges to Nuclear Power Plant Security Requirements Associated with Containment Access Control
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 10, 1995
wage of approximately $30 per hour (loaded) for security personnel, the total savings per reactor per year would be: 2 guards/reactor x 50 days/outage x 2/3 outages/year x $30/ hr-guard x 24 … L. 99-399, 100 Stat. 876 (42 U.S.C. 2169). Sec. 73.55 [Amended] 2. In Sec. 73.55, paragraph (d)(8) is removed and paragraph (d)(9) is redesignated as (d)(8).
60 FR 24803Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCongressional research report · CRS Report · Aug 12, 2010
• DW J-book also shows $413 million for services & studies in FY2010; $544 in million FY2011; amount for “other contracts” = $124 million FY2010, $399 million FY2011. … Assume $120 K per person, cost = from $24 million to no more than $84 million for contractors to prepare reports. Additional amounts for reports prepared internally not available.
ZZZ752FD86E62F2A649Congressional Research ServiceFederal Register / Vol. 71, No. 131 / Monday, July 10, 2006 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
ER06–24–001, EL06–79–000] California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice of Institution of Proceeding and Refund Effective Date June 30, 2006. … RP06–399–000] Kern River Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Petition for Waiver of Tariff Provisions and Request for Expedited Action June 30, 2006.
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
Rul. 74-611, 1974-2 C.B. 399. 2. Shelley Since the overpayment was attributable entirely to taxes withheld from Shelley's income, she alone has any interest in the refund of the overpayment. … --For purposes of section 6511 or 6512-(1) Any tax actually deducted and withheld at the source during any calendar year under chapter 24 shall, in respect of the recipient of the income, be deemed to
United States Tax CourtAnswer to Respondents Brief in Opposition — Jiffy Enterprises, Inc. v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Supreme Court brief · Answer to Respondents Brief in Opposition · 1962
C om- missioner, 248 F. 2d 399 (C. A. 2d).” Moreover, there i is nothing inthe argument (or,cases 1 re- . lied upon therein) set forth in the Petition (10-17). that. … Par. 4(c) & 4 (e)). om 22- 24). a 5.
371 U.S. 922Opposition — Howard v. Des Moines Register & Tribune Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
R. 24 and pray that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari be denied. ra’ — REASONS WHY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED I. … Ed. 2d 399 (1979). + II. Petitioner has failed to meet the requirements set by statute and Supreme Court Rules for a grant of cer- tiorari.
445 U.S. 904Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 1, 2017
See Stay Application 23-24 & n.9 (collecting cases). … In re Howmedica Osteonics Corp., 867 F.3d 390, 399-400 (3d Cir. 2017) (“[W]e do not indefinitely possess mandamus jurisdiction, and, once the transferee court proceeds with the transferred case, the decision
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.