Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.09s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dolenz v. Stuart Yacht Builders, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
UNITED STATES, 428 F2d 73 (5th Cir. 1970), cert denied, 399 U.S. 927..App 126 BURNLEY V. THOMPSON, 524 F2d, 1233..... App 127 CHRISTHILF V. … Drawer 24, Stuart, FL 33497-0024 on this the th day of February, 1989. 24
490 U.S. 1021Petitioner for ReHearing — Williams v. City of Wichita
Supreme Court brief · Petitioner for ReHearing · 1963
Kansas, 320 U.S. 383, 399. That fact alone justifies plenary review. … Exhibit ‘‘A”’ SE %4-30-24-2W ; A. B. Williams, Halstead, Kansas, SE %4-19-24-2W; S % SW %4-30-24-2W, Harvey County. (Balance of ‘list not copied)
375 U.S. 7Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hemmerle v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993
Tucker, 399 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). … Tucker, 399 So.2d at 502.
510 U.S. 978Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Thompson v. Illinois (No. 07-256)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 (1987) ....... ee eee ceeeceeececeee 24 Arizona v. Roberson, 486 U.S. 675 (1988)............cceeeeeeeeee 24 Barksdale v. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 161 (1970).” Id. at 565.
Amicus Brief — Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Mullins
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1982
NLRB, 399 F.2d 977 (D.C. Cir. 1968). … (June 5 and 7, 1979) at 1574-75. 24 lil.
455 U.S. 72Amicus Curiae Brief — US Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Chandler, 767 F.2d 21, 24 (1st Cir. 1985); Dodrill v. Ludt, 764 F.2d 442, 444 (6th Cir. 1985); Quarles v. … Rev. at 95 & n.399 (collecting authorities). But see United States v. Articles of Drug Consisting of 203 Paper Bags, 818 F.2d 569, 572 (7th Cir. 1987).
513 U.S. 18Brief for the United States — Rex Trailer Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1956
MM Sel cwescavackaessace - 24 > oe: ‘No. 1057, 78th ¢ ong.,- 2d, Sess: “pp. to ESTER TELE TET TLL CTT eee saa oo 31 Be NN Se tee 4,11, 24, 25 8. Rep. … Talking: Machine Cwm, 24 : BL 2d 378, 4 'C.A. 2)“eertiorari den ied,. 278 Us. 6u2!
350 U.S. 148Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Michigan National Bank v. Michigan
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1961
S70, at p S79, 123 Mise, 399 (aff'd by App. … [24] | Act 9, Mich. Pub. Adts 1953 [Mich, Comp, ‘Laws 205..%2a; Mich. Stat. Ann.
365 U.S. 467Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cordy v. United States (No. 09-107)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009
Gonzalez-Lopez, 399 F.3d 924, 928 (8th Cir. 2005), aff’d, 548 U.S. 140 (2006). … Gonzalez-Lopez, 399 F.3d at 929 (quoting Urquhart v. Lockhart, 726 F.2d 1316, 1319 (8th Cir. 1984)).
Respondents Brief — Manuel v. City of Joliet, 136 S. Ct. 890 (2016) (No. 14-9496)
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2016
Br. 24-25 n.16, that argument contravenes both Heck and Wallace. … See Graham, 490 U.S. at 399.
supplemental petition — Dougherty v. Haaland
Supreme Court brief · supplemental petition · 1979
See also Stern and Gressman, Supreme Court Practice, 5th Edition, § 6.3, page 399. … ADAMS Circuit Judge Datep: September 24, 1979
444 U.S. 992Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Aug 29, 1994
.......................19 43025-43280.............................................22 43281-43440.............................................23 43441-43702.............................................24 … 43308, 43309, 43311, 43517 91.....................................39711, 43784, 43994 189..................................................39395 257..................................................40836 399
Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Curtin v. Superior Court of California
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1971
Lambermens Mutual Co. (1967) 399 US. S18... 13 Lect v. Union Pasifie Ry. Co. (1984) 25 C2465........ 7 Lomard v. Vicuburg, S&P. R Co (1988) 198 US. 486 10 Miles v. Mlineie General R. … \MeVubbine (Pia.App., | 1987) 196 Bo.24 512; | Rint v. N.YL.B.
401 U.S. 1013Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Morgan v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995
/d. at 823. 10a 399 U.S. 149, 157 (1970). … Green, 399 U.S. at 159; United States v. Lyons, 36 MJ 183, 188 (CMA 1992) (Crawford, J., con- curring in the result).
513 U.S. 1114Opposition Brief — Massis v. Holder (No. 08-1392)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2009
SN ae wie a ae Ee Re RCTS ew ee ae eee ees 24 Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722 1991) ......... ois oe Dakane v. United States Att'y Gen., 399 F.3d 1269 (lith Cir. 2004) .. ; 24 Darby v. … United States Att’y Gen., 399 F.3d 1269, 1273-1274 (11th Cir. 2005).
Opposition Brief — Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp., 117 S. Ct. 2503 (1997) (No. 96-1394)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997
OBIE. cc ccccccvcvcccccsescascssesons 24 SB UBK. … Rules 24 of Civil Procedure," hardly meriting review.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Alfredo Beltran Leyva, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 3, 2019
REV. 1077, 1083 (2011) 24 Hon. Stephen S. Trott, Words of Warning for Prosecutors Using Criminals as Witnesses, 47 HASTINGS L.J. 1381 (1996) 24 U.S. Dep’t of Justice, SOURCEBOOK OF CRIM. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158 (1970)). 23 IV. This case is a good vehicle for review.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ramiro F. Gonzales, Petitioner v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 24, 2024
June 24, 2024). … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986)).
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 17, 2021
Collins, 506 U.S. 390, 399–400 (1993). … In his Reply [R. 24 p. 17] and Objections [R. 28 pp. 23–24] Petitioner echoes the arguments made in his state court appeal.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Houser v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993
/d. at 399. … Gipson, 24 M.J. 246 (C.M.A. 1987).
510 U.S. 864
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.