Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Enernoc, Inc. v. Elec. Power Supply Ass'n, 135 S. Ct. 2049 (2015) (No. 14-841)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

United States, 437 U.S. 443, 62 (1978) (quoting Cohens v. … Control, 569 F.3d at 482.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gill v. Whitford, 138 S. Ct. 52 (2017) (No. 16-1161)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

Vieth, 541 U.S. at 285 (plurality); see also Gaffney, 412 U.S. at 752-73. … LULAC, 548 U.S. at 423-24. In doing so, however, the legislature diluted Latino voting strength in Congressional District 23, in violation of Section 2 of the VRA. Z/d. at 438-42.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Minn. Voters Alliance v. Mansky, 138 S. Ct. 446 (2017) (No. 16-1435)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

Mich- igan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990). … Rights of Man: Part I (1791), reprinted in THOMAS PAINE: COLLECTED WRITINGS 482 (Eric Foner, ed. 1995).

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Texas, 136 S. Ct. 2271 (2016) (No. 15-674)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

NRDC, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). … No. 107-56, § 423(b), 115 Stat. 272, 361. '!

Amicus Curiae Brief — Black & Decker Disability Plan v. Nord

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

Moran, 536 U.S. 355 (2002); Egelhoff v. Egelhoff, 532 U.S. 141 (2001); and UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am. v. Ward, 526 U.S. 358 (1999). … Bruch, 489 U.S. 101, 115 (1989).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Alaska Conservation Council (No. 07-990)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

Gonzales, 520 U.S. 1, 5 (1997); United States v. James, 478 U.S. 597, 604 (1986). … Wells, 519 U.S. 482, 491 (1997). “Fill material” is a term of art in the engineering field, referring to an aggregated material that, when deposited in a space or 28 gap, enhances stability.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Randall v. Sorrell

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990) Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. | (1976) Bullock v. Carter, 405 U.S. 134 (1972) Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003) Harper v. … Supp. 2d at 482-83.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 923 (2018) (No. 17-965)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

U.S. Const. amend. I. … Ct. 423 (2018). Amici do not take a definitive posi- tion on the statutory issues in the case.

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. American Library Assn., Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

Con- necticut, 381 U.S. 479, 482 (1965) (“[T]he State may not, consistently with the spirit of the First Amendment, contract the spectrum of available knowledge.”). … ACLU, 521 U.S. at 879.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Zant v. Moore

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 482 (1976); see also aks Wright, Habeas Corpus: Its History and Its Future (Book Review), 81 Mich.L.Rev. 802, 810 (1983). B. … Reed, 468 U.S. at 16.

Amicus Curiae Brief — United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. Forman

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

See 389 U.S. at 339-340. … Turner Enterprises, Ine. 474 F. 2d 476, 482 (C.A. 9), certiorari denied, 414 U.S. 821; Lino v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

Franklin, 439 U.S. 379 (1979) .......... 5, 20 Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973) ............06- passim Maher v. Roe, 482 U.S. 464 (1977) ............... 6, 8, 11 McRae v. … Roe, 432 U.S. at 472.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert A. Rucho, et al., Appellants v. Common Cause, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 8, 2019

LULAC, 548 U.S. at 423-24. In doing so, however, the legislature diluted Latino voting strength in Congressional District 23, in violation of Section 2 of the VRA. Id. at 438-42. … Ashcroft, 539 U.S. 461 (2003); Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001); Bush v. Vera, 517 U.S. 952 (1996); Shaw v. Hunt, 517 U.S. 899 (1996); United States v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Zubik v. Burwell, 136 S. Ct. 444 (2015) (No. 14-1418)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

O Centro, 546 U.S. at 423. … Amos, 483 U.S. at 335.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Virginia v. Hicks

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

Bailey, 846 F.2d 241, 244 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 984 (1988); Baby Dolls Topless Saloons, Inc. v. City of Dallas, 295 F.3d 471, 482 (Sth Cir. 2002); Staley v. … Ferber, 458 U.S. 747, 771 (1982).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

See Romero 358 U.S. at 381. … Oregon Stevedoring Co, 376 U.S. 315, 322-23 (1964); Michalic v. Cleveland Tankers, Inc. 364 U.S. 325, 328 (1960); Crumady v. The Joachim Hendrik Fisser, 358 U.S. 423, 427 (1959).

Amicus Curiae Brief — William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al., Petitioners v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 2, 2020

the purpose of a person’s use of the sidewalks, see id. at 482–83. … Plain Dealer Publ’g Co., 486 U.S. 750, 772 (1988); Brockett, 472 U.S. at 506.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. Stewmon

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

Robbins, 519 U.S. 482 (1997) ........ssccsccccscsscsessseees 14 Appalachian Power Co. v. … denied, 528 U.S. 1106 (2000).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Davis v. Washington

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

United Air Lines, 527 U.S. 471 (1999), and Murphy v. … utterances are nontestimo- nial); see also Brun, 2005 WL 1797451 (same); Key, 2005 WL 467167 (same); but see Stancil, 866 A.2d at 809°(some excited utterances are testimonial); Hembertt, 696 N.W.2d at 482

Amicus Curiae Brief — Murr v. Wisconsin, 136 S. Ct. 890 (2016) (No. 15-214)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

Palazzolo, 533 U.S. at 617-18; Tahoe-Sierra, 535 U.S. at 333-34, 342; Lingle, 544 U.S. at 537. And the Penn Central analysis itself should be “informed” by that purpose. … City of Homewood, 671 F.2d 482, 435, 438 (11th Cir. 1982) (finding a 52.6 percent diminution not to be a taking); Bernardsville Quarry, Inc. v.