Documents

Opposition Brief — Habig v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973

E) " was entered on January 24, 1973. The petition for a writ ' of certiorari was filed on February 22, 1973. The juris- _ diction of this Court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. 1254(1). … Miriani, 422 F. 2d 150, 153-154 (C.A. 6), certiorari denied, 399 U.S. 910; Cohen v. United States, 405 F. 2d 34 (C.A. 8), certiorari denied, 394 U.S. 943; Feichtmeir v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Piher International Corp. v. CTS Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1976

The lower Court decision in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, involving said patent No. 3,518,604, and others,” is published in 184 USPQ, at page 399, and a … conventional non-flared bearing at the aperture 15, Fig. 2, where the rotatable resistor drive shaft 52 projects through the apertured closure wall 13 (see patent specification column 3, lines 10-24

Opinion — Burnrite Coal Briquette Co. v. Riggs

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1927

fault of payment, the property be sold to satisfy the charges, Upon a second appeal, that decree was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. 6 F. (24) 226. … S. 399, 2; Davis v. O'Hara, 266 U. S. 314, 321. Affirmed. See Ferguson v. Dent, 46 Fed. 88, 96-99; Clark v. Brown, 119 Fed, 130; Beach v.

Brief for the United States — Kirby v. United States Ex Rel. Crow Tribe

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1922

(R. 24-26, 55-57. See also 51-55.) On writ of error, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment below, except as to an item of costs which is not here ma- terial. … S. 397, 399; Brawley v. United States, 96 U. S. 168, 173, 174; Maryland Dredging & Contracting Co. v. United States, 241 U. 8S. 184, 188. See also Wig- more on Evidence, secs. 2465, 2462.

Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Alexander v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1971

United States, SUN . 24 de ( Cie, 1064) 1 henmey v. California Tanker Co, An V, 776 ( Clr, 1067), wort, clon, WO (J. . 0 % —riirr . ꝝ 7 hyptok Voy. Hawn & Co, 217 Ped, 267 (KD. Pa, TT—!.. … Theew (N Kenarg v. ae (3 Cir. 1967); cart. den. 399 U.S. mn: } Torin v. Terare fac, 38 F.2d 28 (3 Cir. 1987). Pip Civett: < Mv. Reynolds Metal Co, 434 F.2d 1068 (5 Gr. ;: rte v. N. A M.

Petitioners Reply Brief — Wilson v. Deitz

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1972

A SSS eee meas Central Hanover Bank and Trust Co., 399 S. 306 i iinebibakieteebathenedes see d SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES October Term 1971 . … Respondent did not reinstate the petitioner or any member of the class, or make retroactive pay- ment, until compelled to do so by the order of the Dis- trict Court entered December 24, 1970.

Petition for Rehearing — Pelley v. Matthews

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 1947

Section 14 of the Act of September 24, 1789, 1 Stat. 73, 81, c. 20. Since the scope of the writ was not de- fined by Congress, it carried its common law implica- tions. … S. 399, 68 L. ed. 759, 44S. Ct. 360. And compare Re Mayfield, 141 U.S. 107, 35 L. ed. 635, 11 S. Ct. 939, with Re Blackbird (C. C.) 66 FP. 541. “«(2) Conviction under unconstitutional statute.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Naquan Reyes, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 6, 2020

Williams, we said that review of a sentencing error is "fundamentally different" from review of a jury trial error. 399 F.3d at 456. … state in open court the reasons for its imposition of the particular sentencg and, if the sentence . . . is of the kind, and within the range, described in subsection (a)(4), and that range exceeds 24

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Perkins v. Laird

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972

On May 24, 1971, petitioner, represented by Minnesota Ac torney Generdl Warren Spannaus pursuant to the provisions - of Minn. … My commission expires Jan. 24, 1978. _ EXHIBIT: A DEPARTMENT OF THE, ARMY _ Headquarters, Fort George G. Meade . Fort George G.

Opposition Brief — AT & T Family Federal Federal Credit Credit Union Union v. First National National Bank Bank & & Trust Trust Co Co. (Nos. 96-847, 96-843)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997

Jd. at 399-400. … In stating that it was overruling these cases, the Clarke Court said: “The [zone of interests] test is not meant to be especially demanding.” 479 U.S. at 399.

Reply Brief — McLane Co. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n, 137 S. Ct. 30 (2016) (No. 15-1248)

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2016

at 399. … Br. at 24-31.

Petition — S & E Shipping Corp. v. United States (Nos. 79-1716, 79-1708, 79-1718)

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

U.S., 399 F.Supp. 386 (N.D.OhiO 1975)... .cccccccccvee 18 Lenkin, et al v. … United States, 399 F.Supp. 386 (N.D.Ohio 1975) (three-judge court).

Amicus Brief — Gulf Oil Co. v. Bernard

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981

The Non-Communication Order is Not Justified by the Need to Protect a Countervailing Compelling Interest 24 2. … Packard Instrument Company, 399 F.2d 711 (7th Cir. 1968) 39 In re Primus, 436 U.S. 412 (1978) 19, 2a Maine v. Thiboutot, 48 U.S.L.W. 4859 (U.S. June 25, 1980) (No. 79-838) 24=26 NAACP v.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Engebretson v. West

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1940

Ed. 276, 280, 24 S. Ct. 154, 158........ eee eee eee 12 Duparquet Hout & Moneuse Co. vs. Evans, 297 U. 8. 316, 222, 80 kL. Bid. 413> 66 BS. … Close, et al., were complainants, and The Brictson Manufacturing Company, was defendant, herein- after called Close case (R. 24).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Chatz v. Midco Oil Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1946

Section 44 of Article IX of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma.................. 18 Text Books Crrep. 18 C.J.S., Sec. 399, page 940 18 Fletcher Cyclopedia Corporation, Vol. 12; Sec. 5539 NORA … S., Sec. 399, page 940, the following pertinent rule is stated: ‘‘The requisite and validity of a transfer of cor- porate stock are governed by the law of the domicile 19 of the corporation, although

Petitioners Brief — Department of Game of Wash. v. Puyallup Tribe

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1973

Indian off.redervaltion fishing rights are subject to state conservation laws only if those laws give adequate recognition to the treaty rights, are “ ‘necessary for the conservation of fish’” (id. at 399 … that while Indian nét fishing is totally prohibited, sports fisher- men are allowed an animal take of 12,000 to 18,000 steelhead trout per year (App. 23-24).

Reply Brief — Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1952

MENARD, 23 Tex. 349, 399; GALVESTON CITY SuRF BATHING Co. v. HEIDENHEIMER, 63 Tex. 559, 562; DeEMeErir v. Rosison, 102 Tex. 358, 361.) … Menard, 23 Tex. 349, 399. In inland seas, at some places, the tides are nearly insensible.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Robert M. Kowalski, Petitioner v. Executive Committee of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 8, 2019

Solomon, 422 F.2d 1110 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 399 U.S. 911, 90 S.Ct. 2201, 26 L.Ed.2d 565 (1970).................................... 8 Wallis v. Exec. Comm, of the U.S. Dist. … Solomon, 422 F.2d 1110 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 399 U.S. 911, 90 S.Ct. 2201, 26 L.Ed.2d 565 (1970); United States v. Palermo, 410 F.2d 468 (7th Cir. 1969); Haller v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Colony Cove Properties, LLC, Petitioner v. City of Carson, California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 29, 2018

United States, 282 U.S. 399 (1931) ............................................... 11 Kelo v. … Galland, 24 Cal. 4th at 1021.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Carlton Gary, Petitioner v. Georgia

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 9, 2018

GARY WOULD VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION GIVEN THE STATE'S DESTRUCTION OF DNA EVIDENCE....... 24 C. … As this 24 Court explained in Illinois v.