Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.78s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Miriam Fuld, et al., Petitioners v. Palestine Liberation Organization, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 4, 2025
Research Serv., U.S. … . 388, 423 (1815) (Marshall, C.J.)
Amicus Curiae Brief — Fry v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Donnan, 285 U.S, 312 (1932) 24 Helvering v. Gerhardt, 304 U.S, 405 (1938) 15 Kelly v. Washington, 302 U.S, 1 (1937) 18 Kotch v. … Missouri, 342 U.S, 421, 423 (1952).
421 U.S. 542Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 7, 2025
United States, 316 U.S. 447 (1942); CBS v. United States, 316 U.S. 407 (1942). … United States, 316 U.S. 407 (1942), and rev’d, 316 U.S. 447 (1942); Decree Granting Temporary Restraining Order, Transcript of Record at 482, Columbia Broad. Sys. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — RCK Properties, Inc. v. United States, 120 S. Ct. 373 (1999) (No. 99-286)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
Los Angeles County, 482 U.S. 304 (1987), and explained that there was such a thing as a regulatory taking and that money damages would have to be paid in the event that a government agency takes property … Lucas, 505 U.S. at 1016 n.7.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gordon v. Lewistown Hospital (No. 05-1000)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Burget, 486 U.S. 94, 105 & n8& (1988). … Walker, 533 U.S. 167 (2001) .......... Rate Ironside v. Simi Valley Hosp., 103 F.3d 482 (6th Cir. SO 6 os Cie ene eee eR aN be eae 13 K. P. Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
Ed. 2d 482, Ge, SPE atic dostkhekehbnsbsssrachets 20 INS v. Chadha, 462 U. S. 919, 77 L. Ed. 2d 317, Se i ee ED initcndccuctieauseansones ba 8,9 INS v. Doherty, 502 U. S. 314, 116 L. … Later, the INS added a charge under 8 U.S.
525 U.S. 471Amicus Curiae Brief — Medellin v. Dretke
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Dion, 476 U.S. 734 (1986); Whitney v. Robertson, 124 U.S. 190 (1888); Cherokee Tobacco Case, 78 U.S. 616 (1871). … United States, 175 U.S. 423 (1899) (claim derived from Convention Between Mexico aid the United States of 1868 subject to judicial cousideration only pursuant to 1892 statute); United States v.
544 U.S. 660Amicus Curiae Brief — Whole Woman's Health v. Cole, 136 S. Ct. 499 (2015) (No. 15-274)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Lawrence, 539 U.S. at 575. … Cleburne Living Ctr., Inc., 473 U.S. 482, 440 (1985) (elevated scrutiny is appropriate in some circumstances at least in part because laws targeting groups for discriminatory treatment using these
Amicus Curiae Brief — Bush v. Gore
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Gore, U.S. Sup. … Williams, 482 U. S. 386, 392, 107 S. Ct. 2425, 96 L. Ed.2d 318 (1987)).
531 U.S. 98Amicus Curiae Brief — C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Clarkstown
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Wunnicke, 467 U.S. at 91. … No. 96-482, § 32(a)(6), 94 Stat. at 2353, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 6941a(6) (1988).
511 U.S. 383Amicus Curiae Brief — Trump v. Int'l Refugee Assistance Project, 138 S. Ct. 50 (2017) (No. 16-1436)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
U.S. … Mohamud, 843 F.3d 420, 423 (9th Cir. 2016).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Georgia, et al., Petitioners v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 30, 2019
See Banks, 128 U.S. at 253. … See id. at 468, 482. Outside the legal community, the need for annotated codes is even greater.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 14, 2020
Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013) ............................................ 19 Constitutional Provisions U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 8 ........................................ 7 U.S. Const. art. … Continental Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 482–483 (1990))). 40 CREW v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 20, 2021
Paul, 505 U.S. 377, 389 (1992) (quoting City of Renton, 475 U.S. at 48). … Fox, 492 U.S. at 482, 486; see id. at 469-481 (describing standard to be applied in assessing the regulation’s application to commercial speech on remand).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. Reeder-Simco GMC, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Minn. 1972), modified on other grounds, 480 F.2d 482 (8th Cir. 1973)); Lupia v. … Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477, 488 (1977); sce also J. Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 451 U.S. 557, 562 (1981).
546 U.S. 164Amicus Curiae Brief — Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Schlunk, 486 U.S. 694, 700 (1988); and Societe Nationale Industrielle Aerospatiale v. U.S. Dist. Court for §. Dist. of Iowa, 482 U.S. 522, 539 (1987)). … Breard, 532 U.S. at 376.
546 U.S. 1001Amicus Curiae Brief — American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Smith
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314 (1987)... 5, 10, 20, 21 Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Com- mission, 482 U.S. 333 (1977) ...................-.------------ 5, 6, 11 Lemon v. … Dias, 468 U.S. 263 (1984).
496 U.S. 167Amicus Curiae Brief — PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC, Petitioner v. New Jersey, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 7, 2021
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469, 482 (2005). … Taxpayers of Tacoma, 357 U.S. 320 (1958). (U.S. Br. 11).
Amicus Curiae Brief — State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Campbell
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Danaher, 238 U.S. 482 (1915), the Court set aside a $6,300 penalty imposed under an Arkansas statute against a telephone company for discriminatory pricing and service as “plainly arbitrary and oppressive … Oberg, 512 U.S., at 433.
538 U.S. 408Amicus Curiae Brief — Mathias v. WorldCom Technologies, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
See Atascadero, 473 U.S. at 239-40; Pennhurst 1, 451 U.S. at 17. 3. … Garden State Bar Ass'n, 457 U.S. 423, 432-34 (1982). State courts are, of course, required to apply federal law, see Testa, 330 U.S. at 394, and are fully able to do so. See Allen v.
535 U.S. 682
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.